图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2016 , Vol. 60 >Issue 18: 21 - 26

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.18.003

专题:基于OPAC日志挖掘的移动图书馆用户检索行为研究

移动图书馆与非移动图书馆用户检索点比较分析

  • 吴丹 ,
  • 毕仁敏
展开
  • 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
吴丹(ORCID:0000-0002-2611-7317),教授,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:woodan@whu.edu.cn;毕仁敏(ORCID:0000-0001-8639-7034),硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2016-08-10

  修回日期: 2016-09-13

  网络出版日期: 2016-09-20

基金资助

本文系2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“面向移动互联网的图书馆用户行为大数据分析与服务创新研究”（项目编号：16YJA870009）研究成果之一。

收起

A Comparative Study on the Access Points of Mobile Library and Non-mobile Library

  • Wu Dan ,
  • Bi Renmin
Expand
  • School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2016-08-10

  Revised date: 2016-09-13

  Online published: 2016-09-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 通过移动图书馆与非移动图书馆OPAC用户使用检索点的比较，探索用户通过不同设备使用图书馆OPAC系统的行为差异，为不同设备OPAC系统检索点的设置等提供参考。[方法/过程] 运用日志挖掘法，对比分析移动图书馆与非移动图书馆检索点出现概率、检索点搜索成功率、检索点变化模式等方面的异同。[结果/结论] 移动图书馆与非移动图书馆检索点存在差异，非移动图书馆在检索点的设置和利用上具有优势。移动图书馆可以通过舍弃低概率的检索点，简化界面内容；通过设置网页标签的形式，方便用户转移检索点；通过减少组配的检索点数量，并突出检索点和检索框来提高组配检索的比例。

关键词： 移动图书馆; 非移动图书馆; 检索点; 用户检索行为

本文引用格式

吴丹 , 毕仁敏 . 移动图书馆与非移动图书馆用户检索点比较分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(18) : 21 -26 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.18.003

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Through the comparative study on the access points of mobile library and non-mobile library, this paper explores the different behaviors that users access library OPAC through different devices, providing reference for setting access points on OPAC of different devices. [Method/process] The paper uses the log mining method to compare the frequency of the access points, the search success rates of the access points, the change patterns of the access points and so on. [Result/conclusion] There are some differences between the mobile library and the non-mobile library in access point, and the non-mobile library has an advantage in the setting and use of the access points. Mobile library can simplify the content of the interface by discarding the access point of low probability; enable users to transfer access point conveniently by setting web tags; improve the proportion of group matching search by reducing the number of group matching access points and highlighting the access points and search box.

Key words： mobile library; non-mobile library; access point; user search behavior

参考文献

[1] KIM L, ALBERS M J. Web design issues when searching for information using handheld interfaces[J]. Technical communication, 2002, 49(3):314-329.
[2] 吴丹, 毕仁敏. 用户移动搜索与桌面搜索行为对比研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016(2):1-8.
[3] KUMAR S, VOHRA R. User perception and use of OPAC:a comparison of three universities in the Punjab region of India[J]. Electronic library, 2013, 31(1):36-54.
[4] ADAM S. Web-based online public access catalogues of ⅡT libraries in India:an evaluative study[J]. Program electronic library & information systems, 2011, 45(4):415-438.
[5] ALIA A, SHAFIQUE F. What do users prefer, card catalogue or OPAC?:a study of Punjab University library[J]. Electronic library, 1983, 32(3):286-295.
[6] 赵荣, 王妍, 魏晨. OPAC用户专业学科需求调研及其改进途径[J]. 图书馆建设, 2009(8):24-28.
[7] 王海英, 汪其英. 国内现有主要OPAC的调查研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2011,23(12):48-53.
[8] 黄崑, 张路路, 郭建峰. 基于公共与非公共检索计算机的OPAC检索行为比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(14):103-110.
[9] PETERS T A. When smart people fail:an analysis of the transaction log of an online public access catalog[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 1988, 15(5):267-273.
[10] THORNE R, WHITLATCH J B. Patron online catalog success[J]. College & research libraries, 1994, 55(6):479-497.
[11] HILDRETH C R. The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog[J]. Information technology & libraries, 1997, 16(2):52-62.
[12] LARGE A, BEHESHTI J. OPACs:a research review[J]. Library & information science research, 1997, 19(2):111-133.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉