收稿日期: 2016-06-30
修回日期: 2016-09-11
网络出版日期: 2016-09-20
An Empirical Research on the Application of Benchmarking in the Optimization of University Library Services
Received date: 2016-06-30
Revised date: 2016-09-11
Online published: 2016-09-20
[目的/意义] 持续改进用户服务是大学图书馆可持续发展的根基，但当前的用户服务研究对图书馆现实服务的提升作用不明显。尝试在图书馆引入定标比超法，为图书馆服务提供一种实用、有效的优化方法和改进思路。[方法/过程] 梳理当前图书馆服务优化的常用方法和定标比超在图书馆界的应用，提出多目标定标比超在图书馆服务优化中的实施流程。选择一家高校图书馆与两家目标图书馆开展实证研究，建立新信息环境下包括三大层次、11项二级指标和46个评价项目的服务评价指标体系，分析本馆用户服务劣势和目标馆优秀实践，拟定服务优化的赶超方案。[结果/结论] 定标比超法之于图书馆服务领域，是一种务实、有效且易于操作的方法，为图书馆管理与创新提供了新的思路；加入新媒体服务、新技术采纳等评价内容的指标体系为今后图书馆评估指标的制订发挥参考作用。
曹文振 . 引入定标比超法的高校图书馆服务优化实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(18) : 71 -78,148 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.18.009
[Purpose/significance] Library service improvement has become an increasingly "hot topic" in academia but still has a difficult point in practice. Introducing benchmarking to library service improvement, this paper tries to provide a new thinking direction and a practical optimization method for library service management and innovation.[Method/process] This paper analyzed common methods for library service improvement and the application of benchmarking in libraries, and proposed the implementation process of multi-objective benchmarking for library services. Then, we selected one academic library and two target libraries to conduct an empirical research to improve library services by using the benchmarking method. We developed appropriate evaluation indicators of library services in the new information environment. This evaluation indicator system included three primary levels, 11 secondary indicators and 46 evaluation items. We analyzed the weaknesses of our own libraries, introduced the best practices of target libraries in customer services, and finally put forward a "catch-up" program of library services.[Result/conclusion] The empirical study shows that benchmarking is a practical, effective and easy-to-use method to improve library services, and provides a different perspective of thinking among library management methods. The new evaluation indicators, such as new media services, adoption of new technologies, can be a reference for further development of the library evaluation system.
[1] Council on Library and Information Resources. Library as place:rethinking roles, rethinking space[M/OL]. Washington, DC:Council on Library and Information Resources, 2005.[2016-06-29]. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub129/pub129.pdf.
[2] 胡昌平. 信息服务与用户[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2008.
[3] 高荣华, 郑德俊, 张友华. 面向科研创新的高校图书馆信息服务需求调查与分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(4):173-177,184.
[4] POWELSON S E, REAUME R D. Using the results of a satisfaction survey to demonstrate the impact of a new library service model[J]. Health information & libraries journal, 2012, 29(3):223-232.
[5] 焦秋阳, 柴雅凌, 袁宁. 六西格玛理论提高图书馆服务竞争力[J]. 高校图书情报论坛, 2007,6(4):6-9.
[6] AHMED S M Z, SHOEB Z H. Measuring service quality of a public university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL[J]. Performance measurement and metrics, 2009, 10(1):17-32.
[7] 上海交通大学图书馆. 数据统计提升图书馆管理与服务品质[R/OL].[2016-02-16]. http://www.sal.edu.cn/2014/pdf/35.pdf.
[8] YE C G. Data mining technology in the implementation of the library service system in colleges and universities[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 sixth International conference on intelligent systems design and engineering applications. Washington, DC:IEEE Computer Society, 2015:263-268.
[9] 孔杰,程寨华. 标杆管理理论述评[J]. 东北财经大学学报, 2004(2):3-7.
[10] 苑钰. 定标比超在图书馆的应用分析[J]. 图书情报工作网刊, 2011(6):43-49.
[11] DEUTSCH P, SILCOX B P. Learning from other libraries:benchmarking to assess library performance[J]. Information outlook, 2003, 7(7):18-25.
[12] NICHOLAS P. Benchmarking, an imperative for special libraries in the Caribbean:the Jamaican case[J]. Library management, 2010, 31(3):186-197.
[13] WILSON F, TOWN J S. Benchmarking and library quality maturity[J]. Performance measurement and metrics, 2006, 7(2):75-82.
[14] 王彩杰, 叶素萍, 廉立军. 定标比超分析法在高校图书馆中的应用研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2008(5):65-66.
[15] Waverley Library. My amazing library:Waverley library strategic plan 2014 to 2017[EB/OL].[2016-09-02]. http://www.waverley.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/77997/MyAmazingLibrary_StrategicPlan_AUG14_FINAL_FEB_2015.pdf.
[16] REICHMANN G, SOMMERSGUTER-REICHMANN M. University library benchmarking:an international comparison using DEA[J]. International journal of production economics, 2006, 100(1):131-147.
[17] 罗军. 当代图书馆管理中的市场化工具[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(3):85-95.
[18] SAYERS R, WALTON G, SMITH I. Researching and benchmarking best practice in library staff development:a joint Australia-United Kingdom study[C]//Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). Proceedings of the ALIA 2008 Biennial Conference:Dreaming 08. Darwin:Australian Library and Information Association, 2008:1-20.
[19] 庞楠, 叶素萍, 廉立军. 定标比超法在高校图书馆文献采访优化工作中的应用研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2008, 20(5):76-78.
[20] 杨琴. 我国高校图书馆标杆管理实施问题及对策研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2009.
[21] KNIGHT-DAVIS S. Benchmarking in libraries[R/OL].[2016-09-06].http://castle.eiu.edu/~pingliu/tec5133/resources/Research_paper_byStaceyKnight.doc.
[22] ROBERTSON M, TRAHN I. Benchmarking academic libraries:an Australian case study[J]. Australian academic & research libraries, 1997, 28(2):126-141.
[23] 于良芝,谷松,赵峥. SERVQUAL与图书馆服务质量评估:十年研究述评[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2005, 23(1):51-57.
[24] 教育部全国高校图书情报工作指导委员会. 高等院校图书馆文献资源发展状况报告(2005-2013)[R/OL].[2016-03-22]. http://www.tgw.cn/sites/default/files/attachment/tjpg/20150428.pdf.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
