情报研究

利用引文内容监测多学科交叉现象的方法与实证

  • 章成志 ,
  • 徐庶睿 ,
  • 卢超
展开
  • 1. 南京理工大学信息管理系 南京 210094;
    2. 江苏省社会公共安全科技协同创新中心 南京 210094;
    3. 江苏省数据工程与知识服务重点实验室 南京 210093
章成志(ORCID:0000-0001-8121-4796),教授,博士,博士生导师,E-mail:zhangcz@njust.edu.cn;徐庶睿(ORCID:0000-0002-7038-1262),硕士研究生;卢超,博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2016-06-16

  修回日期: 2016-09-19

  网络出版日期: 2016-10-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“在线社交网络中基于用户的知识组织模式研究”(项目编号:14BTQ033)和江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目“人文社会科学学术创新力测度研究”(项目编号:2013SJD870002)研究成果之一。

Using Citation Content for Interdisciplinary Phenomenon

  • Zhang Chengzhi ,
  • Xu Shurui ,
  • Lu Chao
Expand
  • 1. Department of Information Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    2. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Safety Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, Nanjing 210093

Received date: 2016-06-16

  Revised date: 2016-09-19

  Online published: 2016-10-05

摘要

[目的/意义]旨在从引文内容分析的角度探测不同学科的专业知识交叉情况。[方法/过程]首先采集PLOS ONE上6个学科的1 389篇学术论文,其中包含引文内容45 496条;然后利用句法分析方法识别引文内容中的名词词语;接着利用词语的类间分布熵计算词语术语度,确定引文内容中的学科术语;最后统计学科术语在其余5个学科的分布情况,探究其背后的学科交叉情况。[结果/结论]分析学科术语在其他学科的频次,得到6个学科之间的学科交叉性。引文内容术语能够探测学科的交叉融合现象,对改进传统的学科多样性测度具有重要的参考价值。

本文引用格式

章成志 , 徐庶睿 , 卢超 . 利用引文内容监测多学科交叉现象的方法与实证[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(19) : 108 -115 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.19.014

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Disciplines-crossing, which has received extensive attention in recent years, is an important reason for the new discipline or research direction. This paper aims to explore the knowledge crossing of different subjects from the perspective of the citation content analysis. [Method/process] Firstly, 1 389 articles are collected, containing 45 496 citation content, from six subjects of PLOS ONE. Secondly, syntactic parser is used to identify the noun phrases in the content. And then, the term of phrase is calculated by Inter-Domain Entropy, and the subject terms are determined. Finally, the distribution of terms in the remaining five disciplines is calculated in order to explore discipline-crossing phenomenon. [Result/conclusion] The distribution of the terms is analyzed to get the interdisciplinarity of the six disciplines. Citation content terms can detect the phenomenon of interdiscipline, and analyze the interdisciplinary phenomenon from the perspective of professional knowledge.

参考文献

[1] 路甬祥. 学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2005,20(1):58-60.
[2] 许海云,尹春晓,郭婷,等. 学科交叉研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(5):119-127.
[3] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine.Facilitating interdisciplinary research[M].Washington D C: The National Academies Press,2004.
[4] STOPAR K, DROBNE D, ELER K, et al. Citation analysis and mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology: identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,106(2):563-581.
[5] LIU C, SHAN W, YU J. Shaping the interdisciplinary knowledge network of China: a network analysis based on citation data from 1981 to 2010[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,89(1):89-106.
[6] CASSI L, MESCHEBA W, de TURCKHEIM É. How to evaluate the degree of interdisciplinarity of an institution?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(3):1871-1895.
[7] ASAMS J, LIGHT R. Mapping interdisciplinary fields: efficiencies, gaps and redundancies in HIV/AIDS research.[J]. PLOS ONE, 2014,9(12):e115092.
[8] SMALL H. Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: co-citation contexts and the role of analogy[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,83(3):835-849.
[9] LIU P, XIA H.Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field[J]. Scientometrics, 2015,103(1):101-134.
[10] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLÄZEL W. Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016,67(5):1257-1265.
[11] ROUSSEAU R, DING J. Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary journals?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016,67(4):1009-1013.
[12] 魏建香. 学科交叉知识发现及其可视化研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2010.
[13] 闵超, 孙建军. 基于关键词交集的学科交叉研究热点分析——以图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2014,33(5):76-82.
[14] 闵超, 孙建军. 学科交叉研究热点聚类分析——以国内图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(1):109-116.
[15] 魏建香, 孙越泓, 苏新宁. 学科交叉知识挖掘模型研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012,35(4):76-80.
[16] 李长玲, 刘非凡, 郭凤娇. 运用重叠社群可视化软件CFinder分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(7):75-80.
[17] 李长玲, 郭凤娇, 魏绪秋. 基于时序关键词的学科交叉研究主题分析——以情报学与计算机科学为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2014,35(6):44-48.
[18] XU H, GUO T, YUE Z, et al. Interdisciplinary topics of information science: a study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,106(2):583-601.
[19] VUGTEVEEN P, LENDERS R, Van den BESSELAAR P. The dynamics of interdisciplinary research fields: the case of river research[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,100(1):73-96.
[20] 刘盛博, 丁堃, 张春博. 引文分析的新阶段:从引文著录分析到引用内容分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2015,33(3):25-34.
[21] ZHANG G, DING Y, MILOJEVIC S, et al. Citation content analysis (CCA): a framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2012,64(7):1490-1503.
[22] ATHAR A. Sentiment analysis of citations using sentence structure-based features[C]//Proceedings of the ACL-HLT 2011 student session. Portland: Student Session, 2011:81-87.
[23] BERTIN M, ATANASSOVA I. A study of lexical distribution in citation contexts through the IMRaD standard[C]//Proceedings of European conference on information retrieval. Amsterdam: First Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval co-located, 2014.
[24] [EB/OL].[2016-05-28].http://ipscience-help.thomsonreuters.com/incitesLiveESI/ESIGroup/overviewESI/esiJournalsList.html.
[25] 宗成庆. 统计自然语言处理[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2008.
[26] [EB/OL].[2016-05-28].http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml.
[27] 章成志. 多语言领域本体学习研究[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2012.

文章导航

/

〈 〉