知识组织

基于社会标签的图像情感分类标注研究

  • 宋灵超 ,
  • 黄崑
展开
  • 1. 南开大学图书馆 天津 300350;
    2. 北京师范大学政府管理学院 北京 100875
宋灵超(ORCID:0000-0002-5513-3623),助理馆员,硕士。

收稿日期: 2016-06-30

  修回日期: 2016-10-20

  网络出版日期: 2016-11-05

基金资助

本文系教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(青年基金项目)“基于大众参与的图像情感特征标引机制与方法研究”(项目编号:11YJC870010)研究成果之一。

Research on Image Emotional Annotations Based on Social Tags

  • Song Lingchao ,
  • Huang Kun
Expand
  • 1. The Library of Nankai University, Tianjin 300350;
    2. School of Government in Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received date: 2016-06-30

  Revised date: 2016-10-20

  Online published: 2016-11-05

摘要

[目的/意义] 提出利用社会标签自动分类图片情感类型的方法,服务基于情感特征的图像检索与利用。[方法/过程] 以Flickr图片为例,利用PMI算法对WordNet-Affect词表进行预处理形成典型情感词表;结合Ekman提出的6类基本情感类型,利用标签对图片情感类型进行标注;并且,通过实验对分类标注效果进行验证;最后,讨论图片特点、标注意图、非情感标签数量对分类标注效果的影响。[结果/结论] 研究发现,一幅图片的非情感标签与情感标签在表现图片整体情感类型的倾向性上具有较高一致性;结合PMI算法,利用预处理后的典型情感词表标注图片的结果优于未处理的WordNet-Affect词表;并且,分类标注效果与人工标注结果也具有较好的一致性,其中,快乐类(Happy)和忧伤类(Sad)图片的分类标注一致性最高,惊讶类(Surprise)的分类标注一致性最低;分析发现,仅通过标签标注图片情感类型的过程中,分类标注效果与图片情感的典型性、单一性以及图片发布方和欣赏者意图、动机的差异、图片的非情感标签个数都有关系。

关键词: 图像; 标签; 情感标注; PMI

本文引用格式

宋灵超 , 黄崑 . 基于社会标签的图像情感分类标注研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(21) : 103 -112 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.21.014

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] To index emotion type of images is useful for organizing and searching images by affective clues.[Method/process] With the Flickr images, this paper took the algorithm of Pointwise Mutual Information and WordNet-Affect wordlists, dealing with tags to categorize images based on Ekman's six emotion types. Then it conducted experiments to test the results. Finally, it discussed the influence of images' features, indexing motivations and the number of non-affect tags on indexing results.[Result/conclusion] Findings indicated for one image, the non-affective tags and affective tags reflected the similar emotion as the whole image.And the typical affective wordlists were also tested useful than before. Moreover, the categorizing results based on typical affective wordlists were accorded with the results categorizing by users. Among 6 emotion types, the majority of Happy and Sad images were categorized correctly. While the Surprise images were categorized worst. Furthermore, the accuracy of categorizing was related to the typicality and unique of emotions of images, the difference between images uploaders and users, and the numbers of non-affective tags in images.

参考文献

[1] 黄崑,骆方,游祎. 图像情感特征及其检索应用[J]. 情报科学,2010,28(4):602-606.
[2] 陆泉,丁恒. 基于情感的图像检索研究综述[J]. 情报理论与实践,2013,36(2):119-124.
[3] 高彦宇,王新平,尹怡欣.自然风景图像情感标识方法研究.小型微型计算机系统,2011,4(4):767-771.
[4] SHIN Y, KIM E Y.Affective prediction in photographic images using probabilistic affective model[C]//Proceedings of the ACM international conference on image and video retrieval.Xi'an:ACM,2010:390-397.
[5] 王上飞,薛佳,王煦法. 基于内容的情感图像获取模型[J]. 计算机科学,2004,31(9):186-190.
[6] 黄崑. 情感信息处理研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2007(11):67-71.
[7] ULINSKI M, SOTO V, HIRSCHBERG J. Finding emotion in image descriptions[C/OL].[2016-03-06].http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2346684.
[8] 宋相法,焦李成. 基于稀疏表示的多示例图像分类[J]. 计算机科学,2015,42(1):293-296.
[9] 王澍,吕学强,张凯,等. 基于快速鲁棒特征集合统计特征的图像分类方法[J]. 计算机应用,2015,35(1):224-230.
[10] 李海芳,贺静,焦丽鹏. 基于颜色特征的图像情感分类[J]. 计算机应用,2007,27(2):453-455.
[11] 陆泉,陈静,丁恒. 基于社会标签的图像情感自动分类标注研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(12):118-123.
[12] 夏召强. 面向互联网社会化图像的标签优化算法研究[D].西安:西北工业大学,2014.
[13] 王琪,杜娟,程彬,等. 基于协作式标注图像数据的垃圾标签检测方法[J]. 计算机与现代化,2015(6):41-45.
[14] WANG H, HUANG H, DING C. Image annotation using bi-relational graph of images and semantic labels[C]//2011 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition(CVPR).Colorado Springs:IEEE, 2011:793-800.
[15] 田枫,沈旭昆.一种适合弱标签数据集的图像语义标注方法[J]. 软件学报,2013,24(10):2405-2418.
[16] JIN Y, KHAN L, WANG L, et al. Image annotations by combining multiple evidence &wordNet.[C]//ACM International Conference on Multimedia.Singapore:ACM,2005:706-715.
[17] HU M, LIU B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews[C]//Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Seattle:ACM, 2004:168-177.
[18] WU Y, REN F. Improving emotion recognition from text with fractionation training[C]//2010 International conference on natural language processing and knowledge engineering. Beijing:IEEE, 2010:1-7.
[19] GHAZI D, INKPEN D,et al. Hierarchical approach to emotion recognition and classification in texts[C]//Canadian conference on artificial intelligence. Berlin:Springer, 2010:40-50.
[20] ALM C O, ROTH D, SPROAT R. Emotions from text:machine learning for text-based emotion prediction[C]//Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing. Vancouver:Association for computational linguistics, 2005:579-586.
[21] SHELKE M N M. Approaches of emotion detection from text[J].International journal of computer science and information technology research, 2014, 2(2):123-128.
[22] AGRAWAL A, AN A. Unsupervised emotion detection from text using semantic and syntactic relations[C]//2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web intelligence and intelligent agent technology. Macau:IEEE, 2012:346-353.
[23] SHAHEEN S, EL-HAJJ W, HAJJ H, et al. Emotion recognition from text based on automatically generated rules[C]//2014 IEEE international conference on data mining workshop. Shenzhen:IEEE, 2014:383-392.
[24] HATZIVASSILOGLOU V, MCKEOWN K R.Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives[C]//Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Madrid:Association for Computational Linguistics, 1997:174-181.
[25] KULLIN H.Flickr reaches 5 billion photos[EB/OL].[2015-04-28].http://www.kullin.net/2010/09/flickr-5-billion-photos/.
[26] ICMR-ACM international conference on multimedia retrieval[EB/OL].[2015-11-02].http://press.liacs.nl/mirflickr/mirdownload.html.
[27] STRAPPARAVA C, MIHALCEA R. Learning to identify emotions in text[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on applied computing. Fortalez:ACM, 2008:1556-1560.
[28] CHURCH K W, HANKS P. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography[J]. Computational linguistics, 1990,16(1):22-29.
[29] RECCHIA G, JONES M N. More data trumps smarter algorithms:comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis[J]. Behavior research methods, 2009, 41(3):647-656.
[30] 杜锐,朱艳辉,田海龙,等. 基于平滑SO-PMI算法的微博情感词典构建方法研究[J]. 湖南工业大学学报,2015(5):77-81.
[31] 赵黎光. 基于依存句法的句子级细粒度情感计算[D].广州:华南理工大学,2015.
[32] SIGURBJORNSSON B, VAN ZWOL R. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. Beijing:ACM, 2008:327-336. 作者贡献说明:宋灵超:负责设计算法、收集并处理实验数据,进行数据分析,撰写论文初稿; 黄崑:进行研究设计,撰写数据讨论部分,进行全文修改和润色。

文章导航

/

〈 〉