收稿日期: 2016-09-20
修回日期: 2016-11-09
网络出版日期: 2016-12-05
基金资助
本文系教育部人文社会科学研究项目青年基金项目“高校图书馆开展科研产出元数据监护服务研究”（项目编号：14YJC870024）和暨南大学2015年学位与研究生教育教学研究和改革项目“研究生创新能力培养评价指标体系构建与应用”（项目编号：MS201524）研究成果之一。
A Case Study of Student Success Oriented Information Literacy Assessment
Received date: 2016-09-20
Revised date: 2016-11-09
Online published: 2016-12-05
[目的/意义]探索如何在《高等教育信息素养框架》的指导下，开展面向学生成功的大学生信息素养评估工作。[方法/过程]通过嵌入创新项目的信息素养课程开展实证研究，从信息素养思维观念和实践能力两个层面分3个角度在时间维度和质量维度上进行评估，采集创新项目过程信息素养思维观念变化、实践能力评估及创新项目过程后个人信息素养实践能力评估数据。[结果/结论]研究显示嵌入创新项目的信息素养评估起到了两方面作用：一是通过评估促进学生信息素养思维观念转变和实践能力提升，培养元认知能力；二是评估能有效分析面向学生成功的信息素养教育成效，展示图书馆对学生成功的贡献度。
关键词： 信息素养评估; 学生成功; 高等教育信息素养框架
黎景光 . 面向学生成功的大学生信息素养评估实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(23) : 46 -54 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.23.006
[Purpose/significance] Information literacy is one of the core competences of student success. This article explores how to construct student success oriented information literacy assessment under the guidance of "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education". [Method/process] Evidence from "Knowledge Practices" and "Disposition" evaluation is collected through a innovative program and a citation analysis. [Result/conclusion] Students can benefit from the information literacy assessment in their "Knowledge Practices" and "Disposition".And the assessment can analyze the information literacy outcomes and document library contributions to student success.
[1] ACRL. Value of academic libraries:a comprehensive research review and report[R/OL]. Chicago:Association of College and Research Libraries, 2010.[2016-09-19].http://www.acrl.ala.org/value.
[2] Student Academic Success Services SJSU. Definition of student success for SJSU[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.sjsu.edu/sass/definition.
[3] BROWN K, MALENFANT K J. Documented library contributions to student learning and success:building evidence with team-based assessment in action campus projects[R/OL]. Chicago:Association of College and Research Libraries,2016.[2016-09-19].http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/contributions_y2.pdf.
[4] ACRL. Framework for information literacy for higher education[R/OL]. Chicago:Association of College and Research Libraries, 2015.[2016-09-19].http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
[5] WITEK D, GRETTANO T. Teaching metaliteracy:a new paradigm in action[J]. Reference services review, 2014, 42(2):188-208.
[6] KUTNER L, ARMSTRONG A. Rethinking information literacy in a globalized world[J]. Communications in information literacy, 2012, 6(1):24-33.
[7] HOSIER A. Teaching information literacy through "un-research"[J]. Communications in information literacy, 2015, 9(2):126-135.
[8] ASH-ARGYLE R, SHOHAM S. Librarians' leadership efficacy, training, and school involvement:collaboration between teachers and school librarians in Israel[J]. School libraries worldwide, 2012, 18(1):1-17.
[9] DETMERING R, JOHNSON A M. Focusing on the thinking, not the tools:incorporating critical thinking into an information literacy module for an introduction to business course[J]. Journal of business & finance librarianship, 2011, 16(2):101-107.
[10] MACKEY T P, JACOBSON T E. Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy[J]. College & research libraries, 2010, 72(1):62-78.
[11] MEYER J, LAND R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge:linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines[M]. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh, 2003:4-5.
[12] TOWNSEND L, BRUNETTI K, HOFER A R. Threshold concepts and information literacy[J]. portal:Libraries and the academy, 2011, 11(3):853-869.
[13] DAVIS H. Critical literacy? Information![EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2010/critical-literacy-information.
[14] RODRIGUEZ D. Understanding library impacts on student learning[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2011/understanding-library-impacts-on-student-learning.
[15] HEAD A J, EISENBERG M B. Lessons learned:how college students seek information in the digital age[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2281478.
[16] LAND R, MEYER J. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (5):dynamics of assessment[J]. Threshold concepts and transformational learning, 2010,42:61-79.
[17] OAKLEAF M. A roadmap for assessing student learning using the new framework for information literacy for higher education[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2014, 40(5):510-514.
[18] WHITLOCK B, EBRAHIMI N. Beyond the library:using multiple, mixed measures simultaneously in a college-wide assessment of information literacy[J]. College & research libraries, 2016, 77(2):236-262.
[19] 徐云,莫军成,莫岚. 大学生图书馆利用和学习成果的关联性实证研究——以桂林医学院为例[J]. 图书馆,2010(1):74-78.
[20] 徐云,沈鸥. 大学生图书馆利用类型与学习成果影响因素实证研究——以桂林医学院为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2010,54(21):74-79.
[21] 吴英梅,何璨. 高校图书馆对学生学业科研影响的实证研究——以北京师范大学为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(20):73-77.
[22] 刘桂宾. 利用图书馆对高校学生学习成果的影响——以南开大学为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报. 2015,33(6):25-35.
[23] 刘桂宾. 图书馆成效评估实证研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究,2015(12):34-38.
[24] 秦小燕. 美国高校信息素养标准的改进与启示——ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》解读[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(19):139-144.
[25] 李曈,叶志锋. 基于ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的我国高校信息素养教材质量评价与编写建议[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(16):54-59,109.
[26] 桂罗敏. 从技术到价值:《美国高等教育信息素养框架》的文化阐释[J]. 图书情报知识,2016(2):14-20,68.
[27] 杨鹤林. 美国《高等教育信息素养框架》分析与思考[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(12):141-146.
[28] 杨鹤林. 阈值概念:构建美国《高等教育信息素养框架》[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2016,35(5):68-74.
[29] 高冉,张波涛,茹海涛. 运用阈概念将信息素养教育嵌入环境科学专业的实践及效果评估[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(7):54-58.
[30] 韩丽风,王茜,李津,等. 高等教育信息素养框架[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(6):118-126.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
