工作研究

基于全过程管理理念的文献情报项目评价体系的构建与实践——以群组平台项目为例

  • 刘宇 ,
  • 杨志萍 ,
  • 王春明 ,
  • 陈漪红 ,
  • 陆颖
展开
  • 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041
刘宇(ORCID:0000-0001-9376-1113),馆员,博士研究生,E-mail:liuy@clas.ac.cn;杨志萍(ORCID:0000-0003-3920-6797),中心副主任,研究员,硕士生导师;王春明(ORCID:0000-0001-5455-5368),副研究馆员,博士;陈漪红(ORCID:0000-0001-9266-2607),研究馆员;陆颖(ORCID:0000-0003-4808-7689),学科咨询服务部副主任,副研究馆员,博士。

收稿日期: 2016-08-04

  修回日期: 2016-12-08

  网络出版日期: 2016-12-20

基金资助

本文系中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“研究所群组集成知识平台可持续服务能力建设”(项目编号:Y11006)和四川省文化厅2016年图书馆学与情报学规划项目“科学大数据环境下学科馆员3.0的图书馆知识组织服务模型”的研究成果之一。

Practice and Construction of Evaluation System of library and Information Projects Based on the Whole Process Management Theory: A Case Study of Group Platforms Project

  • Liu Yu ,
  • Yang Zhiping ,
  • Wang Chunming ,
  • Chen Yihong ,
  • Lu Ying
Expand
  • Chengdu Document and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041

Received date: 2016-08-04

  Revised date: 2016-12-08

  Online published: 2016-12-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 将全过程管理的理论方法融入文献情报项目评价研究之中,构建一套较为完整的文献情报项目评价的全过程管理体系,为图书情报学领域其他项目的评价工作提供可参考的理论模型和实践经验。[方法/过程] 梳理全过程管理理念下的文献情报项目评价的影响因素和管理特征,从4个维度构建基于全过程管理理念的文献情报项目评价体系,并以群组平台项目为例开展实证研究,建立一套基于全过程管理理念的群组平台项目评价体系用以实施项目评价工作。[结果/结论] 从“结构维度”“指标维度”“时间维度”和“策略维度”4个方面较为全面地分析了文献情报项目评价的影响因素和管理特征,设计了一套涵盖“前期基础”“团队建设”“建设路线”“内容建设”“成效建设”“管理机制”和“可持续发展”7项属性的项目评价指标体系,并按照项目评价管理全过程中的“项目计划评价”“项目申报评价”“项目实施评价”“项目验收评价”和“项目后建设评价”5个时间阶段形成针对不同时期的项目评价动态指标方案,同时制定了多项实施策略提升项目评价的管理实施效果。基于全过程管理理念的群组平台项目评价体系的构建,有效支撑群组平台项目评价工作的有序化、合理化和制度化开展。

本文引用格式

刘宇 , 杨志萍 , 王春明 , 陈漪红 , 陆颖 . 基于全过程管理理念的文献情报项目评价体系的构建与实践——以群组平台项目为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(24) : 76 -85 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.24.011

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] In this paper, theory and method of the whole process management were integrated into the evaluation of library and information project. As a consequence, a complete set of the whole process management system of library and information project evaluation was constructed, and it was verified by an empirical research of Group Platforms Project. This work provided a referable theoretical model and practical experience for the evaluation of other projects in the field of library and information science. [Method/process] This paper analyzed the influential factors and management features of the evaluation of library and information project under the whole process management concept. Then, it built an evaluation system of library and information projects based on the whole process management concept via four dimensions. Afterwards, a case study of Group Platforms Project was carried out, and an evaluation system of Group Platforms Project based on the whole process management concept was established to implement the project evaluation. [Result/conclusion] This paper analyzed comprehensively the influential factors and management characteristics of the evaluation of library and information project via the four aspects of structural dimension, index dimension, time dimension and strategy dimension. And it designed a set of project evaluation index system covering seven attributes of preliminary basis, team building, construction route, content construction, effectiveness building, management mechanism and sustainable development. Moreover, it formulated five dynamic project evaluation index schemes for the different periods, according to the five time periods of project plan evaluation, project declaration evaluation, project implementation evaluation, project acceptance evaluation and project post-construction evaluation in the whole process of project evaluation management. Besides, it developed a number of implementation strategies to enhance the management effectiveness of project evaluation. Therefore, the construction of evaluation system of Group Platforms Project based on the whole process management concept effectively made the project evaluation more orderly, reasonable and systematic.

参考文献

[1] STEPHEN M, WILLIAM C. Health program evaluation[M]. St. Louis:The C.V. Mosby Company, 1978.
[2] CATHY L. Health program evaluation[J]. Health services research, 1980, 15(1):69-71.
[3] WEISS C H. Evaluation:methods for studying programs and policies[M]. Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall, 1998.
[4] 戚安邦.项目管理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[5] 席相霖.解析项目管理[J].中国经济和信息化,2002(11):33.
[6] ROGER A. Project management:cost, time and quality two best guesses and a phenomenon, it's time to accept other success criteria[J].International journal of project management, 1999, 17(6):337-342.
[7] LAND R. Assessing project worth at budget time[C]//Proceedings of the American power conference:moving ahead while protecting the environment. Chicago:Illinois Institute of Technology, 1992:906-917.
[8] SAAD M, CICMIL S, GREENWOOD M. Technology transfer projects in developing countries-furthering the project management perspectives[J]. International journal of project management, 2002, 20(8):617-625.
[9] ZIDANE Y, JOHANSEN A, EKAMBARAM A. Project evaluation holistic framework-application on megaproject case[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015,64:409-416.
[10] 郝小云,党晓峰.石油企业科研项目管理与评价模式的研究与应用[J].石油化工应用,2008,27(2):10-13.
[11] LI M, YANG N. Research on the evaluation system of IT project[EB/OL].[2017-01-07] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=5362636.
[12] 武倩文.科研院所科研项目全过程绩效评价指标体系研究[J].经济师,2016(3):71-72.
[13] 张翼,白莹.林业信息化项目建设中的全过程评价研究[J].产业与科技论坛,2014,13(22):229-230.
[14] 肖人毅.面向过程的科研项目评价方法研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2011.
[15] 杨志萍.群组集成知识平台可持续发展能力建设应用实践.[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(7/8):1-5.
[16] 杨志萍,吴鸣.中国科学院文献情报系统学科馆员服务发展能力建设[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):12-16.
[17] 黄铭瑞,王化,张清,等.CEODE-CAS群组集成知识平台应用实践[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(10):72-76.
[18] LIU Y, FU J, ZHENG H, et al. Development and application of knowledge-based subject group integration platforms:a case study of Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, CAS[J]. Chinese journal of library and information science, 2014, 7(2):1-14.

文章导航

/