[1] GARFIELD E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.[J]. Science, 1955,122(3159):1127-1128.
[2] GARFIELD E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.[J]. Science, 1972,178(4060):471-479.
[3] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[4] EGGHE L. Theory and practice of the g-Index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006,69(1):131-152.
[5] KOSMULSKI M. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index[J]. ISSI newsletter, 2006,3(2):4-6.
[6] 叶鹰. h指数和类h指数的机理分析与实证研究导引[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2007,25(5):2-5.
[7] JIN B H, LIANG L M, ROUSSEAU R, et al. The R- and AR-indices:complementing the h-index[J]. Science bulletin, 2007,52(6):855-863.
[8] NEYLON C, WU S. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact[J]. PLoS biol, 2009,7(11):e1000242.
[9] PRIEM J, PIWOWAR H A, HEMMINGER B M. Altmetrics in the wild:Using social media to explore scholarly impact[J]. Computer science, 2012,[EB/OL].[2016-10-27]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745v1.
[10] JAHANDIDEH S, ABDOLMALEKI P, ASADABADI E B. Prediction of future citations of a research paper from number of its internet downloads[J]. Medical hypotheses, 2007,69(2):458-459.
[11] O'EARY D E. The relationship between citations and number of downloads in Decision Support Systems[J]. Decision support systems, 2008,45(4):972-980.
[12] LIPPI G, FAVALORO E J. Article downloads and citations:is there any relationship?[J]. Clin chim acta, 2013,415:195.
[13] COATS A J S. Top of the charts:download versus citations in the International Journal of Cardiology[J]. International journal of cardiology, 2005,105(2):123-125.
[14] EYSENBACH G. Can tweets predict citations? metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.[J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2011,13(4):526-533.
[15] XIN S, PEPE A, BOLLEN J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints:article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations.[J]. PLos One, 2012,7(11):e47523(e47523.
[16] THELWALL M, HAUSTEIN S, LARIVI?RE V, et al. Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services[J]. PLos one, 2013,8(5):e64841.
[17] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, SUGIMOTO C R, et al. Tweeting biomedicine:an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014,4(65):656-669.
[18] LI X, THELWALL M. F1000, mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators[EB/OL].[2017-01-02]. http://sticonference.org/Proceedings/vol2/Li_F1000_541.pdf.
[19] 宋丽萍, 王建芳, 王树义. 科学评价视角下F1000、Mendeley与传统文献计量指标的比较[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014(4):48-54.
[20] WARDLE D A. Do ‘Faculty of 1000’ (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?[J]. Ideas in ecology & evolution, 2010,3:11-15.
[21] 余厚强, 邱均平. 替代计量指标分层与聚合的理论研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2014(10):13-19.
[22] 王贤文, 方志超, 王虹茵. 连续、动态和复合的单篇论文评价体系构建研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015(8):37-48.
[23] 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(19):5-12.
[24] ALBERTS B. Impact factor distortions[J]. Science, 2013,340(6134):787.
[25] GARFIELD E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.[J]. Jama the Journal of the American Medical Association, 2006, 295(1):90-93.
[26] BORDONS M, FERNÁNDEZ M T, GÓMEZ I. Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance[J]. Scientometrics, 2002,53(2):195-206.
[27] 刘盛博, 王博, 唐德龙, 等. 基于引用内容的论文影响力研究——以诺贝尔奖获得者论文为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(24):109-114.
[28] 王剑, 高峰, 满芮, 等. 基于引用频次和内容分析的引文分布与动机关系研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013(9):100-103.
[29] 赵蓉英, 曾宪琴, 陈必坤. 全文本引文分析——引文分析的新发展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(9):129-135.
[30] 钟文一, 陈云鹏. 基于引证系数的论文影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报科学, 2011(5):706-712.
[31] SCHUBERT A. Using the h-index for assessing single publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2009,78(3):559-565.
[32] 杨建林, 严明. 单篇期刊论文h指数的实证研究——以图书情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010,54(12):145-148.
[33] 王凌峰, 张泽玺. 基于引文网络的单篇论文新评价指标:Hi指标[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012(11):52-55.
[34] AJIFERUKE I, WOLFRAM D. Citer analysis as a measure of research impact:library and information science as a case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,83(3):623-638.
[35] 王术, 叶鹰. 影响矩作为测度单篇论著影响力的评价指标探讨[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014(5):12-18.
[36] 吴勤. 基于引证强度的学术论文质量评价方法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2007,26(4):522-526.
[37] 宋歌. 网络分析方法在引文分析中的整合研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011(4):106-114.
[38] 韩毅, 夏慧, 童迎. 引用结构视角下单篇学术文献影响力测度的ID指数[J]. 情报学报, 2013,32(9):968-975.
[39] CHEN P, XIE H, MASLOV S, et al. Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2006,1(1):8-15.
[40] MA N, GUAN J, ZHAO Y. Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis[J]. Information processing & management, 2008,44(2):800-810.
[41] SU C, PAN Y T, ZHEN Y N, et al. PrestigeRank:a new evaluation method for papers and journals[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011,5(1):1-13.
[42] 李仲谋. ScholarRank:一种新的评价学术论文影响力的方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014(7):102-105.
[43] 郑美莺, 梁飞豹, 梁嘉熹. 单篇论文评价方法——PaperRank算法[J]. 科技与出版, 2016(7):94-98.
[44] 牛琪锴, 狄增如, 樊瑛. 科学引文网中基于"H指数"的文章影响力评价[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014(6):672-675.
[45] 李长玲, 翟雪梅. 基于PageRank的引文分析方法探讨[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2007,30(1):122-124.
[46] HICKS D, WOUTERS P, WALTMAN L, et al. Bibliometrics:the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.[J]. Nature, 2015,520(7548):429-431.
[47] Elsevier. Response to HEFCE's call for evidence:independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment[EB/OL].[2016-10-25].https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/53416/Elsevier-response-HEFCE-review-role-of-metrics.pdf.
[48] 沈利华, 缪家鼎, 陈国钢, 等. "客观同行评议"方法探索性研究——一种基于引文分析法的学术论文影响力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012,56(18):144-148.