收稿日期: 2016-11-30
修回日期: 2017-02-17
网络出版日期: 2017-03-05
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目"社群网络环境下开放内容的协作生产与共享机制研究"（项目编号：12CTQ045）和国家自然科学基金青年项目"信息生命周期视角下的大数据隐私风险评估与溯源问责机制研究"（项目编号：71503133）研究成果之一。
Impact of Open Content Licensing on the Sharing Effect of Digital Cultural Goods
Received date: 2016-11-30
Revised date: 2017-02-17
Online published: 2017-03-05
[目的/意义] 传统版权保护（ARR）模式在数字文化产品传播过程中越来越受到挑战，本文旨在分析和检验开放内容许可（OCL）对数字文化产品共享效果的影响，探索有利于文化产品创新和数字资源共享的新途径。[方法/过程] 分析开放内容许可及其在合法分享中的应用问题，以开放音乐为例，提出影响数字音乐传播与共享的研究模型。利用SoundCloud开放音乐分享平台数据，采用对比分析法将样本按照共享模式分为ARR组和OCL组，提取下载频次和播放频次两个测量共享效果的变量，并对样本数据进行统计分析。[结果/结论] 统计结果显示：无论是下载频次，还是播放频次，OCL作品都显著超过ARR作品。相比仅采用版权保护，开放内容许可更有利于数字文化产品的传播与共享。OCL是目前解决非法分享、激励文化创新和促进数字资源共享的有效途径。
张薇薇 , 朱光 , 朱晓东 . 开放内容许可及其对数字文化产品共享效果的影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017 , 61(5) : 79 -86 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.05.011
[Purpose/significance] Traditional copyright mechanism (ARR) is confronted with challenges in delivering digital cultural products. This paper intends to analyse and examine the impact of open content licensing (OCL) on the sharing effect of digital cultural goods, and explore new way of benefiting both cultural products innovation and digital resources sharing. [Method/process] This paper analyses open content licenses as well as their application problems in the process of legal sharing, and establishes a research model of impact factors on the distribution of digital music. Then it takes SoundCloud, an open music sharing platform, as data sources, divides the samples into two groups ARR and OCL according to their sharing type by using comparison method, extracts two variables-play frequency and download frequency-as indicators of sharing effect, and statistically analyses the sample data. [Result/conclusion] The results show that OCL group is significantly better than ARR group in both aspects of download frequency and playback frequency. Open content licensing is more beneficial to the distribution and sharing of digital cultural goods than copyright protection only. OCL will be an effective way of solving current illegal sharing problems, encouraging cultural innovation and promoting digital resources sharing.
[1] 陈传夫. 开放内容的类型及其知识产权管理[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2003, 30(1):9-13.
[2] FRANTSVOG D A. All rights reversed:a study of copyleft, open-source, and open-content licensing[J]. Contemporary issues in education research, 2012, 5(1):15-22.
[3] 傅蓉. 知识共享许可协议[J]. 图书馆, 2006(4):46-48,72.
[4] 翟建雄. 《知识共享许可协议》及其司法判例介绍[J]. 图书馆建设, 2007(6):41-43.
[5] 学淑,马如宇. 基于CCFE增强型知识共享许可协议的网络数字作品版权保护机制的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(8):94-97.
[6] 常艳丽,张俊丽. 公共部门信息再利用中的版权保护——澳大利亚基于知识共享许可协议的实践及启示[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013,36(4):34-38.
[7] 李婧, 党跃武,张玲玲. 我国知识共享协议应用效果综合评价指标体系的建立[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2014,23(4):93-97.
[8] 王斐. 基于知识共享协议的微博授权模式解读[J]. 出版广角, 2016(19):66-68.
[9] 杨嫚,何华刚. 知识共享协议在我国适用性初探[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008, 52(2):37-40.
[10] GIANNOPOULOU A. The creative commons licences through moral rights provisions in french law[J]. International review of law, computers & technology, 2014, 28(1):60-80.
[11] CHELIOTIS G. From open source to open content:organization, licensing and decision processes in open cultural production[J]. Decision support systems, 2009, 47(3):229-244.
[12] LIU C C, LIN C C, DENG K Y, et al. Online knowledge sharing experience with creative commons[J]. Online information review, 2014, 38(5):680-696.
[13] LANG K R, SHANG R D,VRAGOV R. Designing markets for co-production of digital culture goods[J]. Decision support systems, 2009, 48(1):33-45.
[14] AGUIAR L,MARTENS B. Digital music consumption on the internet:evidence from clickstream data[J]. Information economics and policy, 2016(34):27-43.
[15] JEONG B K, KHOUJA M,ZHAO K. The impacts of piracy and supply chain contracts on digital music channel performance[J]. Decision support systems, 2012, 52(3):590-603.
[16] YANG Z,WANG J. Differential effects of social influence sources on self-reported music piracy[J]. Decision support systems, 2015, 69(1):70-81.
[17] CHANG Y M,WALTER J. Digital piracy:price-quality competition between legal firms and p2p network hosts[J]. Information economics and policy, 2015(31):22-32.
[18] EVENS T. Creative commons licences in cultural heritage institutions in flanders[J]. Journal of librarianship & information science, 2016, 48(2):209-217.
[19] STALLMAN R M. Copyright and globalization in the age of computer networks[C]//Free software, free society:selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston:Free Software Foundation, 2002:133-154.
[20] BAZEN S, BOUVARD L,ZIMMERMANN J B. Musicians and the creative commons:a survey of artists on jamendo[J]. Information economics and policy, 2015(32):65-76.
[21] 张鹏飞. 从封闭到开放:一个有关数字音乐产业盈利模式的建议[J]. 音乐传播, 2013,(2):50-54.
[22] LIEBOWITZ S J. Pitfalls in measuring the impact of file-sharing on the sound recording market[J]. CESifo economic studies, 2005, 51(2/3):435-473.
[23] PEITZ M,WAELBROECK P. Piracy of digital goods:a critical review of the theoretical literature[J]. Information economics and policy, 2006, 18(4):449-547.
[24] MORTIMER J H, NOSKO C,SORENSEN A. Supply responses to digital distribution:recorded music and live performances[J]. Information economics and policy, 2012, 24(1):3-14.
[25] CHEUNG C M K,THADANI D R. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication:a literature analysis and integrative model[J]. Decision support systems, 2012, 54(1):461-470.
[26] SALGANIK M J, DODDS P S,WATTS D J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market[J]. Science, 2006, 311(5762):854-856.
[27] 王邈. 音乐传播中的创新_开放与共赢_中国首届音乐产业大会综述[J]. 音乐传播, 2013(4):44-46.
[28] SINHA R K,MANDEL N. Preventing digital music piracy:The carrot or the stick?[J]. Journal of marketing, 2008, 72(1):1-15.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
