[目的/意义] 选取Minitex联盟和上海协作网，从直接网络效应、间接网络效应、双边网络效应3个方面对比分析两个联盟的建设效益和发展差异，并就国内跨系统图书馆联盟的可持续发展提出相应的建议和策略。[方法/过程] 综合网络调研、文献调研和实地访谈等多种方法，对反映两个联盟网络效应的各指标进行资料梳理和对比分析。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明： Minitex网络效应总体上优于上海协作网，联盟牵头馆的机构规模对联盟的建设发展具有一定的影响力，联盟形成的特色服务或产品是联盟可持续发展的有效保障。借鉴Minitex的成功经验，国内跨系统联盟需要加强宣传和推广、加强联盟竞争力优势建设等。
[Purpose/significance] This paper selects Minitex and Shanghai Information Resources Network as research subjects. Through comparing the construction benefit of the two consortiums, the paper analyses their development difference and puts forward several corresponding suggestions which help to promote the development of domestic library consortiums. [Method/process] Combining with network research, literature research and face-to-face interviews, the paper combs the relevant information and detail data which reflects the network effect of the two consortiums by comparative analysis method. [Result/conclusion] Studies suggest that the network effect of Minitex is totally better than Shanghai Information Resources Network. And some other findings include the scale of leading library has influence on the development of the consortium and characteristic service or product is an effective guarantee for sustainable development of the library consortium. Learning from Minitex, domestic library consortiums need to strengthen the publicity and promotion, strengthen the core competitiveness and so on.
[1] OCLC. U.S. library consortia: a snapshot of priorities & perspectives[EB/OL]. [2016-10-20].http://www.oclc.org/reports/us-consortia.en.html.
[2] 伍清霞.数字图书馆联盟效益评估探索——以珠江三角洲数字图书馆联盟为例[J].图书馆论坛,2012,32(4):52-57,135.
[3] 孟凡静.图书馆联盟绩效的知识视角评价[J].情报科学,2014,32(11):96-101.
[4] WALMIKI R H,RAMAKRISHNEGOWDA K C,PRITHVIRAJ K R. Awareness and use of UGC-Infonet digital library consortium by the faculty members of Karnataka State Universities[J]. Annals of library and information studies,2010,57(1):33-43.
[5] 许子媛.图书馆联盟信息共享: 内容、模式与评价[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(9):48-52.
[6] 李太勇.网络效应与竞争策略[J].经济管理,2000(7):29-31.
[7] KATZ M L, SHAPIRO C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility[J]. American economic review, 1985.75(3):424-440.
[8] 郭水文,肖文静.网络效应的作用机制研究[J].经济评论,2011(4):14-22.
[9] 网络效应[EB/OL]. [2016-11-10]. http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=S7iKvlqHO8vf_PNYcHapUswoQPCrLGnJlCWtiSJax1HzmO1NWmehrTeSUZU9SXUBdhNXAef9fZMh0_N6hOnCSjE ERRfGPdztufJBXnIKgY7f05fhF_WaJoXOJSRpQf9O.
[10] 陈会谦.区域图书馆联盟发展趋势及经验分析[J].情报理论与实践,2010,33(4):75-79.
[11] 宋海沂,洪霞.区域图书馆联盟嵌入社会网络的方式、机理与网络效应分析[J].图书馆学研究,2013(20):89-93.
[12] Minitex[EB/OL].[2016-04-25]. http://www.minitex.umn.edu/.
[13] 陈肃.共享有限资源:Minitex模式的发展[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(7):17-22.
[14] 上海文献资源共建共享协作网[EB/OL].[2016-10-20]. http://www.libnet.sh.cn/newsirn/.
[15] 上海地区文献资源协作网[EB/OL].[2016-07-01]. http://www.libnet.sh.cn/newsirn/XZWTX/QQHG/108.htm.
[16] MAJESTIC®营销搜索引擎和SEO反向链接查看器[EB/OL].[2016-06-20]. https://zh.majestic.com/.
[17] 潘国雄,高波,黄梓阳.中美高校图书馆联盟成员权责比较研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(4): 5-11.
