图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2017 , Vol. 61 >Issue 7: 118 - 126

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.07.017

综述述评

国外科学数据影响力研究进展

  • 王毅萍 ,
  • 马建玲
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院兰州文献情报中心 兰州 730000;
    2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049
王毅萍(ORCID:0000-0003-0299-7476),硕士研究生;马建玲,信息系统部副主任,研究馆员,硕士生导师,通讯作者:E-mail:majl@lzb.ac.cn。

收稿日期: 2016-12-30

  修回日期: 2017-03-19

  网络出版日期: 2017-04-05

基金资助

本文系中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项"全球变化知识资源中心建设"（项目编号：Y6ZG431001）研究成果之一。

收起

Progress of Studies on Foreign Scientific Data Impact

  • Wang Yiping ,
  • Ma Jianling
Expand
  • 1. Lanzhou Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2016-12-30

  Revised date: 2017-03-19

  Online published: 2017-04-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 旨在分析国外科学数据影响力的研究内容与存在的问题，为我国在该领域的研究提供参考。[方法/过程] 以国外相关重要机构研究及项目成果调研为主，以Web of Sciences、Google Scholar数据库文献调研为辅，采用文献追溯方法，试图对国外科学数据影响力研究状况进行调研、梳理与总结。[结果/结论] 目前，科学数据影响力研究已经得到国外学术界的关注，其研究内容大致包括科学数据影响力的内涵、类型、关系、相关主体、评价方法五类，但其整体研究仍处于初级阶段。在借鉴国外相关经验的基础上，对我国科学数据影响力未来的研究发展提出培养数据引用意识与文化、加强基础理论研究与特征指标研究的建议。

关键词： 科学数据; 影响力; 评价

本文引用格式

王毅萍 , 马建玲 . 国外科学数据影响力研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017 , 61(7) : 118 -126 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.07.017

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This article aims at analyzing current progress and problems of scientific data impact in foreign countries, as well as providing references for domestic researches. [Method/process] This article was mainly for investigation of foreign institutions, aided by Web of Science Database and Google Scholar literature researching. It used the retroactive method to summarize the progress of foreign scientific data impact research. [Result/conclusion] Now, the evaluation of scientific data impact has attracted foreign academia. Roughly, the contents contain five aspects: connotation, type, relationship, stakeholder and evaluation method. However, the overall researches are still in early stages. Based on foreign experience, this article suggests, for future domestic research on scientific data impact, cultivating consciousness and culture of data citation, and strengthening the research of basic theory and characteristic index.

Key words： scientific data; impact; evaluation

参考文献

[1] 邓仲华,李志芳. 科学研究范式的演化——大数据时代的科学研究第四范式[J]. 情报资料工作,2013,34(4):19-23.
[2] 方璐.大数据时代的科学研究方法[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2014.
[3] 顾立平. 数据级别计量——概念辨析与实践进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2015(2):56-71.
[4] 丁楠,黎娇,李文雨泽,等. 基于引用的科学数据评价研究[J].图书与情报,2014(5):95-99.
[5] 彭国莉,吕先竞,刘文君. DCI社会科学数据分析研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015(3):231-233.
[6] 邢红梅,吕先竞,刘文君,等. 基于DCI的社会学数据影响力分析[J]. 图书馆理论与实践,2016(2):43-46.
[7] OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding[EB/OL].[2016-11-14].http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/oecdprinciplesandguidelinesforaccesstoresearchdat afrompublicfunding.htm.
[8] 李慧佳,马建玲,王楠,等. 国内外科学数据的组织与管理研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(23):130-136.
[9] Oxford living dictionaries[EB/OL].[2016-11-10].https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/impact.
[10] PENFIELD T, BAKER M J, SCOBLE R, et al. Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: a review[J].Research evaluation,2013,23(1):1-12
[11] DURYEA M, HOCHMAN M, PARFITT A. Measuring the impact of research[EO/BL].[2016-11-10].http://facdent.hku.hk/docs/ResGlob2007.pdf.
[12] FEAR K. The impact of data reuse: a pilot study of five measures[EB/OL]. [2016-11-12].https://www.slideshare.net/asist_org/kfear-rdap.
[13] BBSRC policy on maximising the impact of research[EB/OL].[2016-11-14] http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/documents/bbsrc-impact-policy-pdf/.
[14] The value of research data[EB/OL].[2016-11-15].http://www.ands.org.au/working-with-data/articulating-the-value-of-open-data.
[15] Dataimpact campaign[EB/OL].[2016-11-15].http://www.ands.org.au/news-and-events/dataimpact.
[16] FIENBERG S E, MARTIN M E, STRAF M L. Sharing research data[M].Washington: National Academies Press,1985.
[17] FEAR K M. Measuring and anticipating the impact of data reuse[D].Michigan:University of Michigan,2013.
[18] COSTAS R, MEIJER I, ZAHEDI Z, et al. The value of research data-metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view[EB/OL].[2016-10-28].http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/event/value-reseach-data-metrics.
[19] OCHSNER S A, STEFFEN D L, STOECKERT C J, et al. Much room for improvement in deposition rates of expression microarray datasets[J].Nature methods,2008,5(12): 991.
[20] CALLAGHAN S, DONEGAN S, PEPLER S, et al. Making data a first class scientific output: data citation and publication by NERC's environmental data centres[J]. International journal of digital curation,2012,7(1):107-113.
[21] LAWRENCE B, JONES C, MATTHEWS B. Citation and peer review of data: moving towards formal data publication[J].International journal of digital curation, 2011,6(2):4-37.
[22] MAYERNIK M S. Data citations: initiatives,issues,and firststeps[J].Bulletin of American society for information science and technology,2012,8(5):23-28.
[23] MOSS E. Viable data citation: expanding the impact of social science research[EB/OL].[2016-11-17].http://www.slideshare.net/asist_org/rdap13-moss.
[24] MAYERNIK M. Bridging data lifecycles: tracking data use via data citations data workshop[EB/OL].[2016-11-17].http://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/technotes:505.
[25] KONKIEL S. Tracking citations and altmetrics for research data: challenges and opportunities[J].Bulletin of the American society for information science and technology,2013,39(6):27-32.
[26] BALL A, DUKE M. How to track the impact of research data with metrics[EB/OL].[2016-11-05].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/reports/guides/How_to_track_data_impact.pdf.
[27] Joint declaration of data citation principles[EB/OL].[2016-11-25].https://www.force11.org/group/joint-declaration-data-citation-principles-final.
[28] Data citation[EB/OL].[2016-12-22].http://best-practices.dataverse.org/data-citation/#data-citation-standard.
[29] PETERS I, KRAKER P, LEX E, et al. Research data explored: citations versus altmetrics[J].Journal of the association for information science & technology,2015,66(10):2003-2019.
[30] COLQUHOUN D. Should metrics be used to assess research performance? A submission to HEFCE[EB/OL].[2016-11-20].http://www.dcscience.net/2014/06/18/should-metrics-be-used-to-assess-research-performance-a-submission-to-hefce/.
[31] BURROWS R. Living by numbers? Metrics, algorithms and the sociology of everyday life-sydney Ideas-the university of sydney[EB/OL].[2016-11-20].http://sydney.edu.au/sydney_ideas/lectures/2014/professor_roger_burrows.shtml.
[32] Bibliometrics working group case statement[EB/OL].[2016-11-20].http://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/case_statement/RDA_WDS_WG_Publishing_Workflows.pdf.
[33] Alternative assessment metrics (altmetrics) initiative[EB/OL].[2016-11-24].http://www.niso.org/topics/tl/altmetrics_initiative/.
[34] KONKIEL S. Beyond citations: new metrics for measuring the impact of research data[EB/OL].[2016-12-02].https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/16979.
[35] DCC.Preparde[EB/OL].[2016-11-24].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/preparde/preparde.
[36] STRASSER C, KRATZ J, LIN J. Make data count - unit 1 final report[EO/BL].[2016-12-03].https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1328291.v4.
[37] Data citation index[EB/OL].[2016-11-15].http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/dci/.
[38] KONKIEL S. Tracking the impacts of data-beyond citations[EB/OL].[2016-11-17].http://blog.impactstory.org/data-impact-metrics/.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉