[目的/意义]以WOS和CSSCI中收录的1998-2015年间学科服务领域的研究论文为样本数据，对国内外学科服务的理论研究现状进行定量化比较分析，以期为国内相关研究提供参考。[方法/过程]借助CiteSpaceⅢ、Ucinet、NetDraw等可视化工具分别绘制国内外学科服务研究的文献共被引时区视图、高频关键词共现网络图谱与共词聚类知识图谱，对国内外学科服务理论研究的时间分布、知识演化路径、研究热点与主题进行比较分析。[结果/结论]研究结果表明，国内外学科服务研究在研究重心、研究方向、文献影响力、引文性质、研究内容等方面存在差异。
[Purpose/significance] This study mainly uses the methods of Scientometrics to carry out the quantitative comparison analysis on the current status of the theoretical research on the subject services at home and aboard that are based on the papers included in the database of WOS and CSSCI during 1997-2015, in order to provide references for domestic research.[Method/process] Using the visualization software CiteSpace III, Ucinet, NetDraw to draw the knowledge maps of document co-citation, high frequency keyword co-occurrence and co-words cluster networks, this paper compared the amount of articles, research trunk pathes, hotspots at home and aboard respectively.[Result/conclusion] There are differences in the research focus, research direction, literature influence, citation nature and research content at home and abroad.
[1] 赵奕.中美高校图书馆学科馆员工作比较研究[J].高校图书馆工作,2013,32(2):71-74.
[2] 马玉玲.中美大学图书馆学科馆员的比较分析[J].情报资料工作,2010,31(4):107-110.
[3] 徐志玮,陈定权.中美高校图书馆网络化学科信息导航服务比较研究[J].图书馆论坛,2009,29(5):77-79.
[4] 熊欣欣.中美高校图书馆数字化学科服务比较分析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(13):130-134.
[5] 孙坦,初景利.图书馆嵌入式学科服务的理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2015.
[6] SHUMAKER D,TYLER L A. Embedded library services:an initial inquiry into practices for their development, management, and delivery[EB/OL].[2016-11-21]. http://g.yuntsg.com/.
[7] 张士靖,杜建,周志超. 信息素养领域演进路径、研究热点与前沿的可视化分析[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2010,28(5):101-106.
[8] DELONE W H, MCLEAN E R. The delone and mclean model of information systems success:a ten-year update[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2003,19(4):9-30.
[9] ELLS D. Modelling the Information-seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers:a Grounded Theory Approach. Library Quarterly,1993,63(4):469-486.
[10] 韩正彪,周鹏.扎根理论质性研究方法在情报学研究中的应用[J].情报理论与实践,2011,05:19-23.
[11] KUHLTHAU C C. Seeking meaning:a process approach to library and information services[M]. Wesport, ct:libraries unlimited,2004:82.
[12] CONNAWAY L S. "If it is too inconvenient I'm not going after it:" convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors[J]. Library & information science research,2011,33(3):179-190.
[13] WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J]. Informalon science,2000,3(2):49-56.
[14] BAWDEN D. Information and digital literacies:a review of concepts[J].Journal of documentation, 2001,57(2), 218-259.
[15] CHOI Y, RASMUSSEN E. What qualifications and skills are important for digital librarian positions in academic libraries? a job advertisement analysis[J]. The journal of academic librarianship,2009,35(5):457-467.
[16] PARTRIDGE H, LEE J, MUNRO C. Becoming "librarian 2.0":the skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a web 2.0 world (and beyond)[J]. Library trends, 2010, 59(1):315-335.
[17] AUCKLAND M. Reskilling for research:an investigation into the role and skills of subject and liasion librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers[M].london:research,2012.
[18] DAVIDOFF F, FLORANCE V. The informationist:a new health profession?[J]. Annals of internal medicine, 2000, 132(12):996-998.
[19] HSIEH H F, SHANNON S E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis[J].Qualitative health research,2005,15(9):1277-1288.
[20] 张晓林. 走向知识服务:寻找新世纪图书情报工作的生长点[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2000,26(5):30-35.
[21] 李慧珍,云萍. 对大学图书馆"学科馆员"制度的探讨[J]. 图书馆学研究,2004,(10):20-22.
[22] 都平平,杨广锋,邬淑珍. 学科馆员任职资格及绩效考评研究[J].图书馆论坛,2007,27(1):37-39.
[23] 赵闯.基于用户感知价值的高校图书馆学科服务评价研究[J].图书馆学研究,2014(18):98-101.
[24] 廉立军.层次分析法在学科馆员服务质量评价中的应用[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(9):87-91.
[25] 洪跃,崔海峰.高校图书馆学科馆员服务质量评价体系研究[J].图书情工作,2008,52(7):129-132.
