[目的/意义] 信息时代对新老"图书馆五定律"关系进行系统思考和研究,具有较强的理论价值和实践指导意义。[方法/过程] 利用文献调研法和比较分析法,在两个定律基本内容解析的基础之上对两者的关系进行系统研究。[结果/结论] 两者具有继承与发展的关系。新五定律继承了老五定律的基本原则和指导思想:开放性和平等性原则、读者第一、服务至上和坚守知识传播思想;新五定律引入新的信息技术,赋予了旧五律新的内涵与外延。
[Purpose/significance] The paper explores the relationship between the old and new‘Five Laws of Library’systematically in an era of information, with a strong theoretical and practical guiding significance.[Method/process] The paper is a systematic research of the relationship between the two laws based on the interpretation of the two laws' contents, informed by means of document inquisition and comparative analysis.[Result/conclusion] The findings show that the relationship of the old and new‘Five Laws of Library’is inheritance and development. The new‘Five Laws of Library’inherits the fundamental principles and guiding ideology from the old‘Five Laws of Library’: the principles of openness and equality, reader-first service and the persistence of dissemination of knowledge and ideas. The new‘Five Laws of Library’adds the element of advanced information technology, reinvesting the old‘Five Laws of Library’with new meaning and extension.
[1] 魏书娟.图书馆学五定律的再思考[J].河南图书馆学刊, 2008,28(1):15-17.
[2] 徐恩元,徐建华.图书馆学五定律及其给我们的启示[J].湛江海洋大学学报,2003(10):8-13.
[3] 冯琼.图书馆学新老五定律与图书馆人文关怀[J].图书馆论坛, 2007(2):63-65.
[4] 胡乃志,胡岭香.图书馆学五定律新探[J].黑龙江图书馆,1989 (6):17-21.
[5] 阮冈纳赞.图书馆学五定律[M].夏云.等译.北京:书目文献出版社,1988:113-114.
[6] 景海燕.图书馆学新五律[J].图书馆理论与实践,1998(3):57-58.
[7] 黄林英.从图书馆学新老五定律及其关系论图书馆服务[J].图书馆研究与工作, 2005(2):62-65.
[8] 黄权才.谈阮冈纳赞和戈曼的新旧《五定律》[J].图书馆界, 2000 (4):7-11.
[9] 王奕.新老"图书馆学五定律"对高校图书馆数字资源建设的哲学启示[J].图书馆学研究,2013(1):39-41.
[10] 赵笙,张欣毅.图书馆是一个生长着的有机体——图书馆学新老五定律引发的思考[J]. 图书馆理论与实践,1999(4):29-32.
[11] 许正兴.智慧服务视角下图书馆学五定律推演与重构[J].图书馆工作与研究,2015(7):8-10.