[目的/意义] 试图探明Altmetrics应用于我国人文社会科学学术图书影响力评价中面临的主要挑战及应对措施。探索如何应用Altmetrics评价我国人文社会科学学术图书学术影响力及社会影响力。[方法/过程] 采用文献回顾及网络调查的方法，对国内外Altmetrics研究理论与实践成果进行分析。[结果/结论] 我国人文社会科学学术图书Altmetrics评价面临六大挑战，但这些挑战并不会贬损其价值，而是提供了开展深入研究的空间。虽然我国人文社会科学学术图书Altmetrics评价面临挑战，但这些挑战是可应对的。应用Altmetrics可分析我国人文社会科学学术图书的学术影响力及社会影响力。
[Purpose/significance]The paper aims to understand the major challenges and countermeasures to the Chinese academic books altmetrics evaluation for humanities and social sciences in China, and answer the question how to evaluate Chinese academic books based on altmetrics. [Method/process]This paper analyzed the theory and practice of altmetrics at home and abroad by means of the literature review and the network survey. [Result/conclusion]Altmetrics can be used to evaluate the influence of Chinese academic books for humanities and social sciences in China.There are six challenges for the Chinese academic books altmetrics evaluation for humanities and social sciences in China. The challenges will not derogate its value, but provide us with enough room for in-depth study. Although there are challenges for the Chinese academic books altmetrics evaluation for humanities and social sciences in China, but these challenges can be addressed. Altmetrics can be used to analyze and evaluate the academic influence and social impact for Chinese academic books of humanities and social sciences.
[1] 何峻,蔡蓉华.中文图书评价体系研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2016,34(3):51-58.
[2] 谢寿光.中国学术出版:现状、问题与机遇[J].出版发行研究,2013(5):27-30.
[3] 中共中央印发《关于加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学的意见》[N].人民日报,2017-05-17(1).
[4] "中文学术图书引文索引"数据库在京发布[EB/OL].[2017-02-21]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/book/2015-07/23/c_128051464.htm.
[5] HICKS D, WOUTERS P, WALTMAN L, et al. Bibliometrics:the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics[EB/OL].[2016-12-23].http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-resear.
[6] Time to remodel the journal impact factor[EB/OL].[2016-12-23].http://www.nature.com/news/time-to-remodel-the-journal-impact-factor-1.20332.
[7] Altmetrics.About[EB/OL].[2016-12-23].http://altmetrics.org/about.
[8] TORRES-SALINAS D, CABEZAS-CLAVIJO Á, JIMéNEZ-CONTRERAS E. Altmetrics:new indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0[EB/OL].[2017-02-06].https://www.arxiv.org/abs/1306.6595.
[9] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Web indicators for research evaluation. part 2:social media metrics[J].Profesional de la información,2015(5):607-620.
[10] NISO. Outputs of the NISO alternative assessment metrics project:a recommended practice of the National Information Standards Organization[R/OL].[2017-03-22].http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/17091/NISO%20RP-25-2016%20Outputs%20of%20the%20NISO%20Alternati.
[11] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Web indicators for research evaluation. part 3:books and non-standard utputs[J].Profesional de la information,2015(6):724-736.
[12] 邱均平,余厚强.论推动替代计量学发展的若干基本问题[J].中国图书馆学报,2015(1):1-15.
[13] PRIEM J, HEMMINGER B. Scientometrics 2.0:new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web[J]. Nature neuroscience,2010(7):1-20.
[14] Plum Analytics[EB/OL].[2017-02-21].http://plumanalytics.com/.
[15] Explore the impact of your books[EB/OL].[2017-02-21].http://www.bookmetrix.com/.
[16] New Scopus Article Metrics:a better way to benchmark articles[EB/OL].[2017-02-21].https://blog.scopus.com/posts/new-scopus-article-metrics-a-better-way-to-benchmark-articles.
[17] 姚莉,陈祖琴.《国家哲学社会科学成果文库》影响力评价体系研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2016(6):232-236.
[18] 陆宇飞.国家哲学社会科学基金后期资助项目评价体系分析[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2016(6):237-240.
[19] 张玉,潘云涛,袁军鹏.论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(7):69-76.
[20] ZUCCALA A, SOMEREN M, BELLEN M. A machine-learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators:toward a theory of megacitation[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(11):2248-2260.
[21] ZUCCALA A, VERLEYSEN F T, CORNACCHIA R, et al. Altmetrics for the humanities comparing Goodreads reader ratings with citations to history books[J]. Aslib journal of information management,2015,67(3):320-336.
[22] SNIJDER R. Revisiting an open access monograph experiment:measuring citations and tweets 5 years later[J].Scentometrics,2016,109(3):1855-1875.
[23] ZHOU Q,ZHANG C,ZHAO S X, et al.Measuring book impact based on the multi-granularity online review mining[J].Scientometrics,2016,107(3):1435-1455.
[24] 林晓华.基于Altmetrics工具的电子图书学术影响力评价体系构建——以Springer电子图书为例[J].出版发行研究,2016(4):85-89.
[25] 余厚强, HEMMINGER B M,肖婷婷,等.新浪微博替代计量指标特征分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2016(4):20-36.
[26] 赵蓉英,汪少震,陈志毅.补充计量学及其分析工具之探究[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(6):29-34.
[27] What are Altmetrics? Capturing the online attention surrounding scholarly content[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/.
[28] 熊霞,高凡,郭丽君.外文电子图书学术影响力评价方法探讨——基于BKCI、Scopus Article Metrics、Bookmetrix的实例比较[J].现代情报,2016,36(10):118-122.
[29] 卫垌圻,谭宗颖.Altmetrics国内外研究中的问题与挑战[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(2):93-99.
[30] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, SUGIMODO C R, et al. Tweeting biomedicine:an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):656-669.
[31] 韩毅.非正式交流回归语境下取向:科技评价的融合路径[J].中国图书馆学报,2016(4):65-72.
[32] 高飞,张成涛.Altmetrics对人文社会科学领域文献计量的拓展作用[J].情报资料工作,2016,37(1):22-26.
[33] 雷淑义,吕先竞. Altmetrics视角下的学术图书影响力评价研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2017(6):225-231.
[34] 冯思然.关于ISLI标准应用推广工作的思考[J].出版参考,2017(4):20-22.
[35] 冯宏声.出版的未来与ISLI标准的应用[J].出版参考,2017(4):5-9.
[36] 马海群,蒲攀.国内外开放数据政策研究现状分析及我国研究动向研判[J].中国图书馆学报,2015(5):76-85
[37] 黄如花,林焱.法国政府数据开放共享的政策法规保障及对我国的启示[J].图书馆,2017(3):1-6
[38] 何明星.中国图书海外馆藏影响力研究报告(2016)[J].国家图书馆学刊,2016(5):10-10.
