[目的/意义]"双一流"建设使得大学排名成为社会焦点，但其能否反映高校的真实水平仍存质疑，故探析验证大学排名体系的公正性、合理性意义重大。[方法/过程]以世界大学学术排名（ARWU）为研究对象，在深入探究ARWU指标体系及其构型的基础上，对比其与QS、THES、USNWR等著名世界大学排名体系的差异，并以东南亚主要知名大学为例进行实证研究。[结果/结论] ARWU的排名位次与QS、THES、USNWR有较大差异，存在系统误差的可能性，因而有必要在辩证对待各类大学排名体系的基础上，从指标调整等方面对其进行改进和修正。
[Purpose/significance] "Double first-class" construction makes the university ranking become the social focus, but whether it can reflect the true level of colleges and universities has been questioned. So to verify the fairness and rationality of university ranking system is significant.[Method/process] The study takes Academic Ranking of World Universities(ARWU) as the research object. On the basis of exploring the ARWU index system and its structure, the study compares ARWU with the famous university ranking system, such as QS, THES, and USNWR. The study has made an empirical analysis on the well-known universities in Southeast Asia.[Result/conclusion] And results show that ARWU's ranking is different from that of QS, THES and USNWR, and there is a possibility of systematic error. Therefore, it is necessary to dialectically treat all kinds of university ranking system, and on the basis to improve and correct these systems from the aspects of index adjustment.
[1] 统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案[EB/OL].[2017-02-09].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-11/05/content_10269.htm.
[2] HUANG M H. Opening the black box of QS world university rankings[J].Research evaluation,2012,21(1):71-78.
[3] KROTH A,DANIEL H D. International university rankings-a critical review of the methodology[J].Zeitschrift fü rerzieh ungswissenschaft,2008,11(4):542-558.
[4] DILL D D,SOO M.Academic quality, league tables, and public policy:a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems[J].Higher education,2005,49(4):495-533.
[5] 赵蓉英,王嵩.世界大学排名方法及其排行榜比较研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2015(3):131-138.
[6] 杨迎平,闫青.中美大学排行指标体系:差异及启示——基于网大、校友会网和《美国新闻与世界报道》排行榜指标体系的分析[J].教育理论与实践,2015(15):7-9.
[7] 弗兰斯·范富格特,弗兰克·齐格勒,王楠.全球多维大学排名:用户导向与多重维度的全球高等教育与科研排名工具[J].清华大学教育研究,2014(1):1-10,27.
[8] 吴合文."双一流"建设的系统审思与推进策略[J].高等教育研究,2017(1):29-36.
[9] 李鹏虎.关于大学排名与我国世界一流大学建设的理性思考[J].中国高教研究,2016(6):75-79.
[10] 陈军.外国语大学"双一流"建设中借鉴"QS"大学排名指标体系的探索性研究[J].外语电化教学,2016(6):84-89.
[11] 刘念才,程莹,刘莉.世界大学学术排名的现状和未来[J].清华大学教育研究,2005(3):8-15.
[12] Academic ranking of world universities 2016.Methodology[EB/OL].[2017-04-20]. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2016.html.
[13] 阮冬玲.国内大学排行榜指标体系比较研究——以武书连榜、网大榜、校友会榜、中评榜为例[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2014.
[14] 广西师范大学等.分析化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1981:82-83.
[15] DOBROTA M,DOBROTA M.ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity:what if the award factor was excluded?[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2016,67(2):480-482.
[16] List of Nobel laureates by university affiliation[EB/OL].[2017-02-09].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation#Other_universities.
[17] List of Fields Medal winners by university affiliation[EB/OL].[2017-02-09].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fields_Medal_winners_by_university_affiliation.
[18] 王春蕾,刘青华,刘万国.基于用户体验的Scopus与WOS对比分析研究[J]. 图书馆学研究,2012(3):72-76.
[19] 陈娟.Scopus和WoS收录开放获取期刊的定量研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015(4):405-413.
[20] CHEN K H,LIAO P Y. A comparative study on world university rankings:a bibliometric survey[J].Scientometrics,2012(1):89-103.
