理论研究

4种智库影响力评价指标体系评介与比较

  • 栾瑞英 ,
  • 初景利
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049
栾瑞英(ORCID:0000-0002-4721-9128),博士研究生

收稿日期: 2017-07-20

  修回日期: 2017-09-04

  网络出版日期: 2017-11-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"新型出版模式对学术图书馆的影响研究"(项目编号:15ATQ001)和中国科学院文献情报中心研究生创新基金项目"科技智库影响力评价体系建设研究"(项目编号:馆1721)研究成果之一。

Analysis and Comparison of Four Evaluation Index Systems of Think Tanks' Influence

  • Luan Ruiying ,
  • Chu Jingli
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2017-07-20

  Revised date: 2017-09-04

  Online published: 2017-11-20

摘要

[目的/意义]以国内外智库影响力评价指标体系为研究对象,比较分析4种国内外智库影响力评价指标体系,为我国建立和优化中国特色新型智库影响力评价体系提供借鉴。[方法/过程]采用比较分析法和案例分析法,比较国内外4种智库影响力评价指标体系,归纳各自的优势和不足,分析评价指标体系背后的理论基础。[结果/结论]每个指标体系各有优劣,明确评价体系的理论基础,针对不同类型智库运行特点设计不同的影响力评价指标体系是建立完善的中国特色新型智库评价体系的必要条件。

本文引用格式

栾瑞英 , 初景利 . 4种智库影响力评价指标体系评介与比较[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017 , 61(22) : 27 -35 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.22.004

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper takes the evaluation index system of think tanks' influence as its research object, and compares domestic and foreign evaluation index systems of think tanks' influence to provide references for the construction of the influence evaluation system of new types of think tanks with Chinese characteristics.[Method/process] This paper adopted the comparison method and the case study method, compared and analyzed four evaluation index systems of think tanks' influence at home and abroad. It summarized their advantages and disadvantages, and analyzed their theoretical bases.[Result/conclusion] Each evaluation index system has its strength and weakness. It is necessary to construct the comprehensive influence evaluation system of new types of think tanks with Chinese characteristics by understanding the theories underlying the evaluation system and the features of different categories of think tanks.

参考文献

[1] 《关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见》全文[EB/OL].[2017-06-27]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2015-01/21/c_133934292_2.htm.
[2] DICKSON P. Think tanks[M]. New York:Atheneum, 1971:1-3, 26-35.
[3] 里奇. 智库、公共政策和专家治策的政治学[M]. 潘羽辉,等译. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2011:10, 78-91.
[4] 薛澜, 朱旭峰. "中国思想库":涵义、分类与研究展望[J]. 科学学研究, 2006(6):321-327.
[5] 朱旭峰.中国思想库:政策过程中的影响力研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2009:692.
[6] WEAVER R K. The changing world of think tanks[J]. Political science and politics, 1989(22):563-578.
[7] 金芳, 孙震海, 国峰,等. 西方学者论智库[M]. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2010:13-27, 89-93.
[8] TRIMBATH S. Think tanks:who's hot and who's not[J]. The international economy, 2000,14(5):10-47.
[9] STONE D. Capturing the political imagination:think tanks and the policy process[M]. London:Frank Cass, 2005:5-6.
[10] 埃布尔森.智库能发挥作用吗[M]. 扈喜林,译. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2010:62-71.
[11] 孙志茹, 张志强. 思想库影响力测度方法综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010,54(12):78-81.
[12] 朱旭峰, 苏钰. 西方思想库对公共政策的影响力——基于社会结构的影响力分析框架构建[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2004(12):4-5, 21-26.
[13] 王桂侠, 万劲波, 赵兰香. 科技智库与影响对象的界面关系研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2014(12):50-55.
[14] 王桂侠, 万劲波. 科技智库影响力基本要素模型研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016,54(8):146-152.
[15] Global go to think tank index[EB/OL].[2017-07-03]. http://gotothinktank.com/index/.
[16] 2016 Global go to think tank index report[EB/OL].[2017-07-31]. http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12/.
[17] 2015中国智库报告[EB/OL].[2017-07-03]. http://www.sass.stc.sh.cn/eWebEditor/UploadFile/00n/ull/20160128161350250.pdf.
[18] GALTUNG J. A structural theory of imperialism[J]. Journal of peace research, 1971, 8(2):81-117.
[19] CTTI来源智库MRPA测评指标体系介绍(2015-2016)[EB/OL].[2017-08-23]. http://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2016-12/21/nw.D110000gmrb_20161221_3-16.htm?div=-1.
[20] 2016中国智库大数据报告[EB/OL].[2017-07-02]. http://www.cadss.org.cn/index.php/storeroom/zjgd/561-2016.
[21] MILLS C W. The power elite[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1959:269-297.
[22] 古贝,林肯. 第四代评估[M]. 秦霖,蒋燕玲,等译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:24-43.
文章导航

/