图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2017 , Vol. 61 >Issue 24: 77 - 86

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.24.010

情报研究

科学计量方法在科技政策研究中应用的实证研究

  • 丁洁兰 ,
  • 刘细文 ,
  • 杨立英 ,
  • 翟琰琦 ,
  • 王燕鹏
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049
丁洁兰(ORCID:0000-0001-9047-7600),助理研究员,博士研究生;杨立英(0000-0001-5539-9934),研究员,博士生导师;翟琰琦,实习研究员,硕士;王燕鹏(ORCID:0000-0002-2583-9895),实习研究员,硕士

收稿日期: 2017-06-19

  修回日期: 2017-09-27

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-20

基金资助

本文系科技部创新方法工作专项项目"科技政策研究的关键方法、工具集成与示范推广"（项目编号：2013IM010100）和国家自然科学基金面上项目"关于科技政策学的方法论研究"（项目编号：71373253）的研究成果之一。

收起

An Empirical Study on Applying Scientometric Methods in S&T Policy Research

  • Ding Jielan ,
  • Liu Xiwen ,
  • Yang Liying ,
  • Zhai Yanqi ,
  • Wang Yanpeng
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2017-06-19

  Revised date: 2017-09-27

  Online published: 2017-12-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]旨在研究科学计量方法在科技政策研究中的应用程度和范围。[方法/过程]对科学计量领域与科技政策领域的实证数据集进行关键词分析，设计二维词频分析框架，并在此基础上通过聚类分析揭示不同类型的计量与政策研究相结合的主题。[结果/结论]数据结论显示：科学计量方法在科学政策研究中的应用主要是在宏观层面，而在微观问题层面应用相对较少；一些利用科学计量方法研究的政策问题并非是科技政策领域的研究热点或核心。这种情形与科学计量学的学科特点与使用局限性有一定的关系，但如何恰当扩展和深化科学计量方法在科技政策领域的应用，以解决科技政策中的具体问题、更好地支撑科技管理与科技决策，需要引起关注。

关键词： 科学计量学; 科技政策; 关键词词频分析; 二维分析框架; 聚类分析

本文引用格式

丁洁兰 , 刘细文 , 杨立英 , 翟琰琦 , 王燕鹏 . 科学计量方法在科技政策研究中应用的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017 , 61(24) : 77 -86 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.24.010

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to study the depth and width of the application of scientometric methods in S&T policy research.[Method/process] The analysis is based on publications from scientomerics and S&T policy field. Using keywords analysis, two dimensional analytic system, and clustering analysis, different types of topics derived from the combination of scientomerics and S&T policy research are revealed.[Result/conclusion] The results show that the applications of scientomeric methods in S&T Policy field generally focus on macro level, but rarely related to specific problems. And some topics using scientomeric methods in S&T policy field are not hot topics or core topics in S&T policy research. Those finds may be related to the feature and limitations of scientometrics field. However, how to use scientometric methods in S&T Policy field deeper and wider in a proper way in order to resolve specific S&T policy problems and support S&T management and decision making is an issue which should be paid attention to.

Key words： scientometrics; S&T policy; keywords frequency analysis; two dimensional system; clustering analysis

参考文献

[1] BRAUN T, BUJDOSÓ E, SCHUBERT A. Literature of analytical chemistry:a scientometric evaluation[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 1987.
[2] VINKLER P. The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators[M].Oxford:Chandos Pub, 2010.
[3] MINGERS J, LEYDESDORFF L. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics[J]. European journal of operational research, 2015, 246(1):1-19.
[4] 庞景安. 科学计量研究方法论[M]. 北京:科学技术文献出版社, 1999.
[5] 梁立明, 武夷山. 科学计量学:理论探索与案例研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006.
[6] HAYASHI M C P I, ROTHBERG D. Scientific knowledge and digital democracy in Brazil:how to assess public health policy debate with applied scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(3):825-833.
[7] GUSKOV A, KOSYAKOV D, SELIVANOVA I. Scientometric research in Russia:impact of science policy changes[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(1):287-303.
[8] HUANG C, SU J, XIE X, et al. A bibliometric study of China's science and technology policies:1949-2010[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2):1521-1539.
[9] 杨丽, 徐飞. 中国科学院女性院士特征状况计量分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(5):942-947.
[10] 周萍, 马峥, 佟贺丰. 政府研发投入与国内期刊论文之分布研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2012(10):22-32.
[11] 周萍, 张旭, 周冬梅. 中国主要基金的中文论文产出绩效比较[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012(19):43-48.
[12] 王文平, 刘云, 蒋海军. 中国政府资助中欧科技合作的特征研究——基于文献计量分析的视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(6):801-810.
[13] 梁立明. 科学计量学与信息计量学的发展:中国大陆与台湾地区比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(18):5-12.
[14] 刘云, 陈泽欣, 刘文澜,等. 中美合作发明授权专利计量分析及政策启示[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012(S2):761-767.
[15] INGLESI-LOTZ R, POURIS A. scientometric impact assessment of a research policy instrument:the case of rating researchers on scientific outputs in South Africa[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(3):747-760.
[16] POURIS A. Scientometric research in South Africa and successful policy instruments[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2):317-325.
[17] YALPANI M, HEYDARI A, MEHRDAD M. Application of scientometric methods to chemical research in Iran:reflections on Iran's current science policy[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 63(3):531-547.
[18] RINIA E J. Scientometric studies and their role in research policy of two research councils in the Netherlands[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 47(2):363-378.
[19] SCHNEIDER J W, VAN LEEUWEN T N. Analysing robustness and uncertainty levels of bibliometric performance statistics supporting science policy. a case study evaluating Danish postdoctoral funding[J]. Research evaluation, 2014, 23(4):285-297.
[20] SHEHATTA I, MAHMOOD K. Research collaboration in Saudi Arabia 1980-2014:bibliometric patterns and national policy to foster research quantity and quality[J]. Libri, 2016, 66(1):13-29.
[21] JUNQUERA B, MITRE M. Value of bibliometric analysis for research policy:a case study of Spanish research into innovation and technology management[J]. Scientometrics,2007, 71(3):443-454.
[22] CROUCH D, IRVINE J, MARTIN B R. Bibliometric analysis for science policy:an evaluation of the United Kingdom's research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography[J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5):239-267.
[23] PHILLIPS D C, TURNEY J. Bibliometrics and UK science policy[J]. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(3):185-200.
[24] URQUHART C, DUNN S. A bibliometric approach demonstrates the impact of a social care data set on research and policy.[J]. Health information & libraries journal, 2013, 30(4):294-302.
[25] BALL R, GLÄNZEL W. The German experience in the applications, benefits and limitations of evaluative bibliometrics in a policy-relevant context-preface[J]. Open access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2005, 62(1):115-116.
[26] 陈春, 肖仙桃, 孙成权. 文献计量分析在日本技术预见中的应用[J]. 图书情报工作, 2007, 51(4):52-55.
[27] HASANAGAS N D, STYLIADIS A D, PAPADOPOULOU E I. Environmental policy and science management:using a scientometric-specific GIS for e-learning purposes[J]. International journal of computers communications & control, 2010, 5(2):171-178.
[28] SCHUMMER J. The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research:a bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 6(3):197-203.
[29] VANDERELST D, SPEYBROECK N. Scientometrics reveals funding priorities in medical research policy[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(1):240-247.
[30] 谭晓, 张志强. 图情领域中专利分析主题的研究进展——基于WOS的文献分析[J].图书情报工作, 2012, 56(20):85-91.
[31] 黄裕荣, 侯元元, 蔚晓川,等. 我国太阳能电池研究的文献计量分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015(S1):173-175,231.
[32] 王贤文, 刘则渊, 侯海燕. 全球主要国家的科学基金及基金论文产出现状:基于Web of Science的分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(1):61-66.
[33] DEBACKERE K, GLÄNZEL W. Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making:the case of the Flemish BOF-key[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(2):253-276.
[34] LEEUWEN T N V. The use of combined bibliometric methods in research funding policy[J]. Research evaluation, 2001, 10(3):195-201.
[35] LEEUWEN T N V, VISSER M S, MOED H F, et al. The Holy Grail of science policy:exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 57(2):257-280.
[36] GLÄNZEL W, DEBACKERE K, THIJS B, et al. A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 67(2):263-277.
[37] NEDERHOF A J. Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 74(1):163-174.
[38] THOMAS P R, WATKINS D S. Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review:a comparative case study with policy implications[J]. Scientometrics, 1998, 41(3):335-355.
[39] VENTURA O N, MOMBRU' A W. Use of bibliometric information to assist research policy making. a comparison of publication and citation profiles of full and associate professors at a school of chemistry in Uruguay[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(2):287-313.
[40] 刘俊婉. 高被引科学家人才流动的计量分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(2):192-197.
[41] 杨丽, 徐飞. 中国科学院女性院士特征状况计量分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(5):942-947.
[42] 王军辉, 谭宗颖. 基于文献计量的科学创造力评价研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017,61(3):131-139.
[43] PRICE D D S. The analysis of scientometric matrices for policy implications[J]. Scientometrics, 1981, 3(1):47-53.
[44] DELANGHE H, SLOAN B, MULDUR U. European research policy and bibliometric indicators, 1990-2005[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(2):389-398.
[45] NOYONS E C M, CALERO-MEDINA C. Applying bibliometric mapping in a high level science policy context[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 79(2):261-275.
[46] 李江, 刘源浩, 黄萃,等. 用文献计量研究重塑政策文本数据分析——政策文献计量的起源、迁移与方法创新[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015(2):138-144,159.
[47] 金炬, 武夷山, 梁战平. 国际科技合作文献计量学研究综述——《科学计量学》(Scientometrics)期刊相关论文综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2007, 51(3):63-67.
[48] JANSZ M C N. Some thoughts on the interaction between Scientometrics and Science and Technology Policy[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 47(2):253-264.
[49] NOYONS E. Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 50(1):83-98.
[50] 李哲. 科技创新政策的热点及思考[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(2):177-182.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉