[目的/意义]为了更好地揭示主题研究领域跨学科发展的学科对象和研究内容，提出一种综合的跨学科态势分析方法。[方法/过程]首先，根据主题领域确定涉及到的所有学科类别，并定义学科影响力指数，构建学科影响力网络。然后，对学科影响力网络进行中心度、结构洞和可视化分析，识别核心学科类别。最后，构建关键词-学科类别共现网络，使用网络中心度分析获得由关键词表示的主题内容，并结合核心学科类别和领域专家意见获得跨学科主题内容。[结果/结论]实证表明提出的分析方法能够在一定程度上揭示主题研究领域跨学科发展态势，其有效性得到一定程度的验证。
[Purpose/significance] In order to reveal the directions and contents of the interdisciplinary development of the subject research field, this paper proposes a comprehensive interdisciplinary situation analysis method.[Method/process]Firstly, the subject categories involved were determined according to the subject field and the discipline influence index was defined. Then, the subject influence network was constructed. Secondly, the subject categories influence network was analyzed by the centrality, structural holes and visual methods to identify the core subject categories. Finally, a keyword-subject category co-occurrence network wase constructed, and analyzed by the centrality method to obtain the main knowledge content. The interdisciplinary knowledge content was obtained by the combination with the core subject categories and the domain expert opinions.[Result/conclusion]Experimental results show that the comprehensive analysis method can reveal the interdisciplinary development trend of the subject research to a certain extent. Its effectiveness is verified to a certain extent.
[1] 刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J]. 科学学研究, 1993, 11(2):9-13.
[2] WAGNER C S, ROESSNER J D, BOBB K, et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR):a review of the literature[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):14-26.
[3] 李江. "跨学科性"的概念框架与测度[J]. 图书情报知识,2014(3):87-93.
[4] STIRLING A. On the economics and analysis of diversity[EB/OL].[2017-04-30]. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp28/sewp28.pdf.
[5] STIRLING A. A general framework for analyzing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of Royal Society interface, 2007,4(15):707-719.
[6] 黄颖,高天舒,王志楠,等. 基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J]. 科研管理,2016(3):124-132.
[7] 陈仕吉,陈晨,韩涛,等. 基于重叠结构的跨学科链接探测与分析[J]. 图书情报工作,2016,60(15):94-100.
[8] SMALL H. Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse:co-citation contexts and the role of analogy[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 83(3):835-849.
[9] RAFOLS I, PORTER A L, LEYDESDORFF L. Science overlay maps:a new tool for research policy and library management[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(9):1871-1887.
[10] 魏建香,孙越泓,苏新宁. 学科交叉知识挖掘模型研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2012(4):76-80.
[11] 岳增慧,许海云,郭婷,等. "情报学"与"计算机跨学科应用"的学科交叉对比研究[J]. 情报资料工作,2016(2):16-22.
[12] BUTER R K, NOYONS E C M, VAN RAAN A F J. Identification of converging research areas using publication and citation data[J]. Research evaluation, 2010, 19(1):19-27.
[13] BUTER R K, NOYONS E C, VAN RAAN A F. Searching for converging research using field to field citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(2):325-338.
[14] PUDOVKIN A I, GARFIELD E. Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(11):1113-1119.
[15] 林聚任. 社会网络分析:理论、方法与应用[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009.
[16] 刘军.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[17] BURT R S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
[18] RAIDER H J. Market structure and innovation[J]. Social science research, 1998, 27(1):1-21.
[19] NetDraw[EB/OL].[2017-04-15]. http://www.analytictech.com/downloadnd.htm.
[20] 叶春蕾,邢燕丽. 基于LDA和社会网络中心度的研究生个性化检索推荐模型研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(13):104-110.
[21] 王旻霞,赵丙军. 跨学科知识交流网络结构特征研究[J]. 情报科学,2016,34(5):46-50.
[22] 苗润莲. 国外都市农业发展与实践[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2014.
[23] VAN ECK N, WALTMAN L. Software survey:VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2):523-538.
