工作研究

电子资源订购决策评价的若干思考——以中国科学院电子资源集团采购为例

  • 罗祺姗 ,
  • 翟爽 ,
  • 张静
展开
  • 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190
罗祺姗,副研究馆员,博士,E-mail:luoqs@mail.las.ac.cn;翟爽(ORCID:0000-0002-4328-8898),馆员,硕士;张静,馆员。

收稿日期: 2017-09-04

  修回日期: 2017-12-04

  网络出版日期: 2018-02-05

基金资助

本文系2016年中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项子项目"院所协同的电子资源采购绩效评估体系和优化分析服务平台"(项目编号:院1675-2)研究成果之一。

Study on the Acquisition Decision Assessment of Electronic Resources: A Case Study of the Group Purchasing of the National Science Library of CAS

  • Luo Qishan ,
  • Zhai Shuang ,
  • Zhang Jing
Expand
  • National Science Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2017-09-04

  Revised date: 2017-12-04

  Online published: 2018-02-05

摘要

[目的/意义]建立符合实际工作特点的电子资源订购决策评价指标体系框架,设计科学合理的评价结果运用原则与运用模式,为制定科学合理的电子资源订购决策提供支撑。[方法/过程]结合国内外电子资源订购决策评价理论与实践,以中国科学院集团订购电子资源工作为例,分析和设计电子资源订购决策评价指标体系的评价原则、评价内容和评价指标。[结果/结论]构建包含5个评价方面18项评价指标的决策评价指标体系框架,并提出"需求优先、质量保障、成本优化、综合考虑"的评价结果运用原则以及纵向比较、横向比较和分类比较的评价结果运用模式。

本文引用格式

罗祺姗 , 翟爽 , 张静 . 电子资源订购决策评价的若干思考——以中国科学院电子资源集团采购为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018 , 62(3) : 39 -44 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.03.005

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]Taking the characteristics of electronic resources acquisition work into consideration, this paper establishes a framework of the indicator system of the acquisition decision assessment and builds the application guidelines for its use in order to provide support for making a scientific and reasonable acquisition decision. [Method/process]Based on the theory and experience of the acquisition decision assessment of electronic resources carried out by the main information institutions, taking the characteristics of electronic resources acquired by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Consortium for instance,this paper analyzed the assessment principles, assessment concepts and indicators. [Result/conclusion]This paper establishes the framework of the indicator system of the acquisition decision assessment which contains five assessment concepts and eighteen indicators, and builds the application guidelines-demand first, quality guarantee, cost optimization and overall consideration. It also puts forward three application models which are the vertical comparison, horizontal comparison and sorting comparison.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院知识资源组织与服务的新需求、新模式、新思路暨第八届电子资源培训[EB/OL]. [2017-04-18]. http://etraining2017.csp.escience.cn/.
[2] CONCERT台湾学术电子资讯资源共享联盟[EB/OL]. [2017-04-25]. http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/page/index_1.
[3] 香港大学图书馆[EB/OL]. [2017-04-25]. http://lib.hku.hk/cd/policies/erp.html#Sect3a.
[4] The Center of Research Libraries[EB/OL]. [2017-05-17]. https://www.crl.edu/collections/cooperative-collection-building.
[5] FOX D, LAM V T. Canadian National Site Licensing Project[J]. The serials librarian, 2003,43(3): 39-57.
[6] University of Maryland Libraries[EB/OL]. [2017-05-18]. https://www.lib.umd.edu/collections/policies/electronic-resources.
[7] FAU Libraries[EB/OL]. [2017-05-10]. http://www.library.fau.edu/policies/cd_e-resources.htm.
[8] 高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟(DRAA)[EB/OL]. [2017-05-06]. http://www.libconsortia.edu.cn/Spage/view.action?pagecode=pjzxjs.
[9] Über nationale Lizenzen[EB/OL]. [2017-05-10]. http://www.nationallizenzen.de/ueber-nationallizenzen.
[10] 肖珑, 李浩凌, 徐成. CALIS数字资源评估指标体系及其应用指南[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2008(3):2-8,17.
[11] 汤罡辉.国际学术期刊库绩效评价方法应用现状[J]. 图书馆建设,2011(3):5-10.
[12] 吕旭霞.电子资源利用绩效评估指标体系的构建[J]. 图书馆学研究,2009(12):51-53,31.
文章导航

/