图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 4: 81 - 88

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.04.011

情报研究

学术社交网站用户社交不足的影响机理：基于质性方法的探索

  • 张帅 ,
  • 李晶 ,
  • 王文韬
展开
  • 安徽大学管理学院 合肥 230601
张帅(ORCID:0000-0002-5792-877X),硕士研究生,E-mail:zs09053@163.com;李晶(ORCID:0000-0002-0004-907X),副教授,博士;王文韬(ORCID:0000-0002-4629-3684),讲师,博士.

收稿日期: 2017-09-07

  修回日期: 2017-11-18

  网络出版日期: 2018-02-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目"基于社交媒体的学术交流行为模式及优化策略研究"（项目编号：17CTQ028）研究成果之一。

收起

The Mechanism of Users Social Insufficiency in Academic Social Networking Sites: Based on the Exploration of Qualitative Method

  • Zhang Shuai ,
  • Li Jing ,
  • Wang Wentao
Expand
  • School of Management, Anhui University, Hefei 230601

Received date: 2017-09-07

  Revised date: 2017-11-18

  Online published: 2018-02-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]探析用户在学术社交网站中社交不足的影响机理，为用户优化学术社交行为提供理论指引，同时也为学术社交网站探索和开发社交功能提供一定借鉴与参考。[方法/过程]借助NVivo 11质性分析软件，对获取的41篇研究文献进行内容分析，梳理出学术社交网站用户社交不足的9个关键影响因素并聚焦为3个主要影响因素，在此基础上构建学术社交网站用户社交不足影响因素理论模型。[结果/结论]通过文献梳理表明，个体意向因素是学术社交网站用户社交不足的直接影响因素和内部驱动因素，平台客观条件与信息因素是间接影响因素和外部情境因素。其中，个体意向因素包括学术资本、主观规范、分享意识以及时间精力；平台客观条件包括学术声誉机制和后发劣势；信息因素包括信息效益、隐私信息和专业知识。

关键词： 学术社交网站; 用户行为; 内容分析; 影响因素

本文引用格式

张帅 , 李晶 , 王文韬 . 学术社交网站用户社交不足的影响机理：基于质性方法的探索[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018 , 62(4) : 81 -88 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.04.011

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Exploring the factors influencing the social insufficiency of users in academic social networking sites can provide some theoretical guidance for users to optimize academic social behavior and some reference for exploring and developing social functions of social network platform. [Method/process] In this paper, we use NVivo 11 qualitative data analysis software to analyze the content of the 41 research literatures, sort out nine keyinfluencingfactors of users social insufficiency in academic social networking sites and focus on three main influencing factors. On this basis, a theoretical model of social insufficiency for users in social networks is constructed. [Result/conclusion] The research shows that theindividual intention factor is the direct influence factor and the internal driving factor of the user's social insufficiency in academic social networking sites, and the platform objective condition and the information factor are the indirect influence factors and the external situational factors. Among them, the individual intention factor includes academic capital, subjective norm, sharing consciousness, and time energy; the platform objective condition includes academic reputation mechanism and backwardness; information factor includes information efficiency, privacy information and professional knowledge.

Key words： academic social networking sites; users behavior; content analysis; influencing factors

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心.第40次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R/OL]. [2017-08-04].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201708/P020170807351923262153.pdf.
[2] KRAUSE J. 5-Tracking references with social media tools: organizing what you've read or want to read[EB/OL]. [2018-01-06]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B97818 43346814500050.
[3] ResearchGate. Recruiting [EB/OL]. [2017-08-04].https://solutions.researchgate.net/recruiting.
[4] We're Hiring [EB/OL]. [2017-08-04]. https://www.academia.edu/hiring.
[5] Muchong[EB/OL]. [2017-08-04]. http://muchong.com.
[6] RICHARD V N. Online collaboration: scientists and the social network[J]. Nature, 2014, 512(7513): 126-129.
[7] JENG W, HE D, JIANG J. User participation in an academic social networking service: a survey of open group users on Mendeley[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(5): 890-904.
[8] GRUZD A, GOERTZEN M. Wired academia: why social science scholars are using social media[C]//2013 46th Hawaii international conference onsystem sciences (HICSS). Washington,DC: IEEE, 2013: 3332-3341.
[9] JORDAN K. Academics and their online networks: exploring the role of academic social networking sites[J]. First Monday, 2014, 19(11): 1-21.
[10] CHAKRABORTY N. Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in NEHU: a study on Facebook and ResearchGate[J].Nflibnet centre, 2012, 5(3):19-27.
[11] MEISHARTAL H, PIETERSE E. Why do academics use academic social networking sites? [J]. The international review of research in open and distributed learning, 2017, 18(1): 1-22.
[12] 胡蓉. 学术社交网站用户分析方法的研究及应用[D]. 广州:华南师范大学, 2015.
[13] 贾新露, 王曰芬. 学术社交网站的概念、特点及研究热点[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2016(5):7-13.
[14] 赵杨, 李露琪. 国内外学术社交网站研究现状述评与思考[J]. 情报资料工作, 2016(6): 41-47.
[15] OH J S, WEI J. Groups in academic social networking services——an exploration of their potential as a platform for multi-disciplinary collaboration[C]// IEEE third international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust. Boston:IEEE, 2011:545-548.
[16] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Academia.edu: social network or academic network? [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science &Technology, 2015, 65(4):721-731.
[17] REBIUN. Science 2.0: the use of social networking in research [EB/OL]. [2017-08-05]. https://gredos.usal.es/jspui/bitstream/10366/104135/1/DBD_Rebiun_Ciencia20_EN.pdf.
[18] 张晓娟, 周学春. 社区治理策略、用户就绪和知识贡献研究:以百度百科虚拟社区为例[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(9):72-82.
[19] 李晓方. 激励设计与知识共享——百度内容开放平台知识共享制度研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2):272-278.
[20] KRRKUP G. Academic blogging: academic practice and academic identity[J]. London review of education, 2010, 8(1): 75-84.
[21] GAO H, HU C, JIANG T. An exploratory study of paper sharing in Mendeley's public groups[C]// iConference 2015 Proceeding. Illinois: iSchools,2015:659-667.
[22] PIWOWAR H. Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where? [J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 39(4):8-9.
[23] 刘春丽, 何钦成. 不同类型选择性计量指标评价论文相关性研究——基于Mendeley、F1000和Google Scholar三种学术社交网站工具[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(2):206-212.
[24] JENG W, DESAUTELS S, HE D, et al. Information exchange on an academic social networking site: a multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(3): 638-652.
[25] 王曰芬, 贾新露, 傅柱. 学术社交网站用户内容使用行为研究——基于科学网热门博文的实证分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(6):63-72.
[26] GU F, WIDEN-WULFF G. Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: a finnish case study[J]. The electronic library, 2011, 29(6): 762-776.
[27] ORTEGA J L. How is an academic social site populated? A demographic study of google scholar citations population[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1):1-18.
[28] MEWBURN I, THOMSON P. Why do academics blog? An analysis of audiences, purposes and challenges[J]. Studies in higher education, 2013, 38(8):1105-1119.
[29] SALAHSHOUR M, DAHLAN H M, IAHAD N A. A case of academic social networking sites usage in Malaysia: drivers, benefits, and barriers[J]. International journal of information technologies & systems approach, 2016, 9(2):88-99.
[30] DENG L, YUEN A H K. Understanding student perceptions and motivation towards academic blogs: an exploratory study [J]. Australasian journal of educational technology, 2012, 28(1):48-66.
[31] WEBER R P. Basic content analysis[M]. London:Sage publications, 1990: 49.
[32] 颜士梅. 内容分析方法及在人力资源管理研究中的运用[J]. 软科学, 2008, 22(9):133-139.
[33] BAZELEY P. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo [M]. London: Sagepublications, 2007: 82-83.
[34] ELLIS T, LEVY Y. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research informing science[J]. International journal of an emerging transdiscipline, 2006, 9(9): 181-212.
[35] 薛调, 刘云, 刘彦庆. 高校图书馆嵌入式教学实施的影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(15):83-87.
[36] FRANCIS J J, JOHNSTON M, ROBERTSON C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies[J]. Psychology and health, 2010, 25(10): 1229-1245.
[37] 陈向明. 扎根理论的思路和方法[J]. 教育研究与实验, 1999 (4): 58-63.
[38] NICHOLAS D. New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation in the digital age[J].Information Services & Use, 2017, 37(1): 1-5.
[39] AUGG H, WEST R E, TATEISHI I, et al. Mendeley: creating communities of scholarly inquiry through research collaboration[J]. Techtrends, 2011, 55(1): 32.
[40] NICHOLAS D, HERMAN E, JAMALI H R, et al. New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation[J]. Learned publishing, 2015, 28(3): 169-183.
[41] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[42] 胡文静, 王睿. 社交网络学术活动特征分析及应对策略[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017(1): 34-41.
[43] 张耀坤, 张维嘉, 胡方丹. 中国高影响力学者对学术社交网站的使用行为调查[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017, 38(3): 96-101.
[44] ELSAYED A M. The use of academic social networks among Arab users: a survey[J]. Social science computer review, 2016, 34(3): 378-391.
[45] ORTEGA J L. Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites[J]. Online information review, 2015, 39(4): 520-536.
[46] VELETSIANOS G. Open practices and identity: evidence from users and educators' social media participation[J]. British journal of educational technology, 2013, 44(4): 639-651.
[47] 周小玲, 马瀚青, 侯春梅, 等. Kudos 平台对我国期刊出版平台影响力提升的启示[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(10): 1061-1067.
[48] NANDEZ G, BORREGO Á. Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study[J]. The electronic library, 2013, 31(6): 781-791.
[49] COLLINS K, SHIFFMAN D, ROCK J. How are scientists using social media in the workplace? [J]. PloS one, 2016, 11(10): e0162680.
[50] 张素芳, 张晓晓. 科研社交网络用户行为倾向的影响因素分析[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2014, 23(4):36-41.
[51] AHMED E B, TEBOURSHI W, KARAA W B A, et al. Ontossn: scientific social network ontology[C]// 2014 15th IEEE/ACIS international conference on Software engineering, artificial intelligence, networking and parallel/Distributed computing (SNPD).Nevada:IEEE, 2014: 1-4.
[52] ZYL A S V. The impact of social networking 2.0 on organisations[J]. Electronic library, 2009, 27(6):906-918.
[53] 李玲丽, 吴新年. 科研社交网络的发展现状及趋势分析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2013, 34(1):36-41.
[54] 陈明红, 漆贤军, 刘莹. 科研社交网络使用行为的影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(10):73-79.
[55] 屈宝强. 网络学术论坛中的科研合作行为及其反思——以"小木虫"学术论坛为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2010, 30(10):215-218.
[56] 王刚, 黄崐, 贺曦冉,等. 科研社交网络对科技论文传播的影响[J]. 中国高校科技, 2017(6): 43-45.
[57] 刘晓娟, 刘新哲. 虚拟学术群组特征研究——以用户为分析视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(24):83-92.
[58] BULLINGER A C, HALLERSTEDE S, RENKEN U, et al. Towards research collaboration a taxonomy of social research network sites[C]//Sustainable IT Collaboration Around the Globe,16th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Lima: AMCIS,2010:1-9.
[59] CHEN J M, TANG Y, LI J G, et al. Community-based scholar recommendation modeling in academic social network sites[C]//International conference on Web information systems engineering. Berlin: Springer, 2013: 325-334.
[60] HOLMBERG K, BOWMAN T D, HAUSTEIN S, et al. Astrophysicists' conversational connections on Twitter[J]. PloS one, 2014, 9(8): e106086.
[61] WILLIANMS A E, WOODACRE M A. The possibilities and perils of academic social networking sites[J]. Online information review, 2016, 40(2): 282-294.
[62] 李玲丽, 吴新年, 张甫. 开放型科研社交网络应用调查与分析——以Academia.edu为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2013, 34(1):90-93.
[63] COLLINS E, HIDE B. Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for users[EB/OL]. [2017-08-13].http://elpub.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?119_elpub2010.
[64] GRUZD A, STAVES K, WILK A. Connected scholars: examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2012, 28(6): 2340-2350.
[65] 约翰松. 美第奇效应: 创新灵感与交叉思维[M]. 刘尔铎, 杨小庄,译.北京: 商务印书馆, 2006:3.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉