理论研究

基于扎根理论的个体医疗健康信息源选择行为影响因素研究

  • 张鑫 ,
  • 王丹
展开
  • 1. 河北大学管理学院 保定 071002;
    2. 中国人民大学书报资料中心 北京 100086
张鑫(ORCID: 0000-0001-9156-8387),讲师,E-mail:zealyxin@163.com;王丹(ORCID: 0000-0002-8854-0671),编辑。

收稿日期: 2017-12-24

  修回日期: 2018-04-11

  网络出版日期: 2018-07-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国网络社会治理研究"(项目编号:14ZDA063)和河北大学"一省一校"专项经费项目"全面小康视域下健康信息的协同治理研究"(项目编号:801260201202)研究成果之一。

Influence Factors Research on Health Information Source Selection of Individuals Based on Grounded Theory

  • Zhang Xin ,
  • Wang Dan
Expand
  • 1. College of Management, Hebei University, Baoding 071002;
    2. Information Center for Social Science, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100086

Received date: 2017-12-24

  Revised date: 2018-04-11

  Online published: 2018-07-20

摘要

[目的/意义]对公众的医疗健康信息源选择行为影响因素进行调查和分析,不仅有助于为国内医疗健康信息资源建设提供针对性依据,也有助于对公众的医疗健康信息获取提供高效服务。[方法/过程]运用扎根理论方法,对38名普通个体的医疗健康信息源选择行为的访谈文本进行分析,包括开放式编码、主轴编码、选择性编码及理论模型构建4个阶段。[结果/结论]研究发现个体的医疗健康信息源选择行为影响因素主要包括个体状态-动机因素、感知质量因素、关系结构因素以及信息源运行水平因素,最终构建了一个综合的个体医疗健康信息源选择行为影响因素的理论模型。

本文引用格式

张鑫 , 王丹 . 基于扎根理论的个体医疗健康信息源选择行为影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018 , 62(14) : 5 -13 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.14.001

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] To investigate and analyze the influencing factors of individuals' health information source selection, helps to provide targeted basis for the construction of medical health information resources in China. It also helps to provide efficient service for the public health information acquisition. [Method/process] This study applied grounded theory to analyze the interview texts of 38 individuals' health information source selection behavior, including four stages: open coding, axis coding, selective coding and theoretical model construction. [Result/conclusion] The results indicate that the influence factors of health information source selection of individuals are related to individual conditions-motivation factors, perceived quality factors, relationship and structure factors and information source operation level. Finally, a theoretical framework of influence factors of individual's health information source selection is constructed.

参考文献

[1] KIM S. An exploratory study of inactive health information seekers[J]. International journal of medical informatics, 2015, 84(2):119-133.
[2] GENUIS SK. Constructing "sense" from evolving health information:a qualitative investigation of information seeking and sense making across sources[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(8):1553-1566.
[3] ZHANG Y. Beyond quality and accessibility:source selection in consumer health information searching[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2014, 65(5):911-927.
[4] KAMALI S, AHMADIAN L, KHAJOUEI R, et al. Health information needs of pregnant women:information sources, motives and barriers[J]. Health information & libraries journal, 2018, 35(1):24-37.
[5] TURNER A, KABASHI A, GUTHRIE H, et al. Use and value of information sources by parents of child psychiatric patients[J]. Health information & libraries journal, 2011, 28(2):101-109.
[6] GIVEN L M, WILLSON R, ALBRECHT L, et al. Information in crisis:health & technology-related information behaviors of parents in emergency departments[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 53(1):1-10.
[7] ATKINSON N L, SAPERSTEIN S L, PLEIS J. Using the Internet for health-related activities:findings from a national probability sample[J]. Journal of medical Internet, 2009,11(1):e4
[8] WALKER L O, MACKERT M S, AHN J, et al. E-health and new moms:contextual factors associated with sources of health information[J]. Public health nursing, 2017, 34(6):561-568.
[9] 李颖, 杨伟娜, 李媛. 数字环境下城乡青年健康信息搜寻行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(12):115-123.
[10] ROWLEY J, JOHNSON F, SBAFFI L. Gender as an influencer of online health information-seeking and evaluation behavior[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2017, 68(1):36-47.
[11] LIN T C, HWANG L L, LAI Y J. Effects of argument quality, source credibility and self-reported diabetes knowledge on message attitudes:an experiment using diabetes related messages[J]. Health information & libraries journal, 2017, 34(3):225-235.
[12] 吴江, 李姗姗. 在线健康社区用户信息服务使用意愿研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017(4):119-125.
[13] JOHNSON J D, MEISCHKE H. Women's preferences for cancer information from specific communication channels[J]. American behavioral scientist, 1991, 34(6):742-755.
[14] REIFEGERSTE D, BACHL M, BAUMANN E. Surrogate health information seeking in Europe:influence of source type and social network variables[J]. International journal of medical informatics, 2017,103:7-14.
[15] CHEN W, LEE K H, STRAUBHAAR J D, et al. Getting a second opinion:social capital, digital inequalities, and health information repertoires[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65(12):2552-2563.
[16] PANDIT N R. The creation of theory:a recent application of the grounded theory method[J]. Qualitative report, 1996(4):1-15.
[17] 闫慧,闫希敏. 农民数字化贫困自我归因分析及启示——来自皖甘津的田野调查[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014(5):68-81.
[18] STRAUSS A L,CORBIN J M. Basics of qualitative research:techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, 1998.
[19] LAYDER D. New strategies in social research:an introduction and guide[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1993.
[20] NAHAPIET J,GHOSHAL S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of management review,1998, 23(2):242-266.
[21] 于良芝. 整体性社会理论及其对信息不平等研究的适用性——以布迪厄的社会理论为例[J]. 上海高校图书情报工作研究, 2011(1):1-9.
文章导航

/