[目的/意义] 探讨Altmetrics指标对学术图书影响力进行评价的有效性，为学术图书评价工作提出合理建议。[方法/过程] 获取Twitter提及量、Mendeley阅读量、在线书评数量以及馆藏量指标数据，对数据集的覆盖率、分位数等统计量分析后，将被引频数与Altmetrics指标进行了指标间相关系数检验，再对高Altmetrics指标值的学术图书进行年份分布、学科差异及图书主题等实证分析，探究各指标在学术图书影响力评价中的应用。[结果/结论] 传统计量指标被引频数与Altmetrics指标之间的相关性较低，说明Altmetrics可以作为学术图书评价的一个新视角，不同Altmetrics指标反映了学术图书影响力的不同维度。未来的学术图书影响力评价建议结合学术图书的年份、学科等特征，将传统的引文与Altmetrics指标相结合，探索更全面有效的评价机制。
[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to explore the effectiveness of Altmetrics in revealing the impact of academic books, and then put forward reasonable suggestions for academic book evaluation. [Method/process] Four Altmetrics indicators, Twitter reference, Mendeley reading, text review and libcitation are collected. After analyzing the coverage, quantiles and other statistics of books, the correlation between book citation and Altmetrics indicators is carried out. Books of high indicator values are evaluated from the aspects of published year, discipline and subject in order to explore the application of these indicators in the use of book impact evaluation. [Result/conclusion] The low correlation between book citation and Altmetrics indicators shows that Altmetrics can be used as a new perspective for evaluating academic books, and different Altmetrics indicators reveal different dimensions of book impact. It is suggested to combine Altmetrics indicators and citation and make more use of the characteristics of books such as year and discipline in the future research of book impact evaluation.
[1] THOMPSON J W. The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship[J]. Libri, 2002, 52(3):121-136.
[2] 张玉, 潘云涛, 袁军鹏,等. 论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7):69-76.
[3] 邱均平, 余厚强. 基于影响力产生模型的替代计量指标分层研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015(5):53-58.
[4] 何峻, 蔡蓉华. 中文图书评价体系研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2016, 34(3):51-58.
[5] 林晓华. 基于Altmetrics工具的电子图书学术影响力评价体系构建——以Springer电子图书为例[J]. 出版发行研究, 2016(4):85-89.
[6] KOUSHA K, THELWALL M. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(3):566-581.
[7] THELWALL M, STEFANIE H, VINCENT L, et. Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services[J/OL].[2017-10-03]. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
[8] KOUSHA K, THELWALL M, ABDOLI M. Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books[J/OL].[2017-06-01]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.23805.
[9] ZUCCALA A, WHITE H D. Correlating libcitations and citations in the humanities with WorldCat and Scopus Data[C]//Procs of 15th Intl conf on scientometrics and informetrics. Boaziçi University Printhouse:Istanbul, Turkey, 2015:305-316.
[10] NEYLON C. Altmetrics:What are they good for?[EB/OL].[2017-10-03]. http://blogs.plos.org/opens/2014/10/03/altmetrics-what-are-they-good-for/.
