[目的/意义] 通过学术交流生态系统的研究与北京大学学术交流生态系统的初步构建，为高校与科研机构建设学术交流生态系统，推动学术交流和开放获取服务提供研究与实践参考经验。[方法/过程] 梳理学术交流概念、模式、功能与国内外研究发展情况，分析学术交流环境变化，指出开放获取、数据驱动研究范式、软件工具发展、社交媒体、教育教学新变革等因素驱动学术交流生态系统重构。介绍北京大学新一代学术交流生态系统的研究成果、架构设计、构建经验与服务效果，总结机构知识库、研究数据服务、开放出版、学者主页与研究支持服务等建设经验与效果。[结果/结论] 研究提出新一代学术交流生态系统，是以开放学术交流为目标，以学术资源数据汇集为基础，覆盖完整学术交流生命周期，提供研究准备、学术发现、研究与分析、写作、发布、传播与评价等学术交流全流程服务，并利用文献计量、数据挖掘、机器学习等新技术，为教学、科研、科研管理、学科评估等提供支持。总结研究成果和经验，为高校与科研机构建设学术交流生态系统提供有价值的研究与建设参考经验。推动学术交流发展，促进研究创新。
[Purpose/significance] Based on comprehensive investigation and study worldly, this article provides the research and framework construction of a new scholarly communication ecosystem. The paper provides research and experience of building scholarly communication ecosystem.[Method/process] It generalizes the concept, model, function and development of scholarly communication. Through the analysis of the changes in the scholarly communication environment, the paper points out that the open access, data-driven research paradigm, software tool development, social media, and new changes in education and teaching have driven scholarly communication ecosystem reconstruction. The paper also introduces the research achievements, architecture design, construction experience and service effect of the next generation of scholarly communication ecosystem of Peking University, and sums up the construction experience and effect of institutional repository, research data management, open publishing, scholarly website and research support services.[Result/conclusion] Aiming at openly scholarly communication, the paper proposes a new generation of scholarly communication ecosystem, which provide wholly academic resources and services, covers the entire scholarly life cycle, such as preparation, discovery, analysis, writing, publishing, outreach and assessment. Based on the use of new technologies such as Bibliometrics, deep mining, and so on, the Ecosystem could support for teaching, research, research management and academic assessment. The research helps academic libraries to promote the development of scholarly communication ecosystem and benefits for the improvement of scholarly communication and research innovation.
[1] GARVEY W D. Communication, the essence of science. facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers, and students[M]. New York:Pergamon Press. 1979:26-27.
[2] COMMITTEE A S C. Principles and strategies for the reform of scholarly communication[EB/OL].[2017-07-21]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies.
[3] BORGMAN C L. Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication[J]. Journal of documentation, 2000, 56(4):412-430.
[4] FYFFE R, WARNER B F. Scholarly communication in a digital world:the role of an institutional repository[EB/OL].[2018-03-31]. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/126/Institutional+repository+White+Paper.doc?sequence=1.
[5] BOETTCHER J. Framing the scholarly communication cycle[J]. Online, 2006, 30(3):24-26.
[6] FJORDBACK SØNDERGAARD T, ANDERSEN J, HJØRLAND B. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information:revising and updating the UNISIST model[J]. Journal of documentation, 2003, 59(3):278-320.
[7] 徐丽芳. UNISIST模型及其数字化发展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008, 52(10):65-69.
[8] TENOPIR C, KING D W. Towards electronic journals:realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers[M]. Washington DC:Special Libraries Association, 2000:60.
[9] ROOSENDAAL H E, GEURTS P A T M. Forces and functions in scientific communication:an analysis of their interplay[EB/OL].[2018-01-08]. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/forces-and-functions-in-scientific-communication-an-analysis-of-t.
[10] MARON N L, SMITH K K. Current models of digital scholarly communication[J]. Association of Research Libraries, 2008(7):49-62.
[11] KRAMER B, BOSMAN J. Innovations in scholarly communication-global survey on research tool usage[EB/OL].[2018-01-15]. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0012.105/--current-models-of-digital-scholarly-communication-results?rgn=main;view=fulltext.
[12] CLOBRIDGE A. Open access:progress, possibilities, and the changing scholarly communications ecosystem[J]. Online searcher:information discovery, technology strategies, 2014, 38(20):42-52.
[13] RODRIGUEZ A. Collaboration in scholarly communication:opportunities to normalize open access[J]. College & research libraries news, 2017, 78(5):270.
[14] ESTELLE L. What researchers told us about their experiences and expectations of scholarly communications ecosystems[J]. Insights, 2017, 30(1):71-75.
[15] 胡德华, 韩欢. 学术交流模型研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(2):26-30.
[16] 张耀坤, 胡方丹, 刘继云. 科研人员在线社交网络使用行为研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(3):138-147.
[17] 夏秋菊, 栗文超, 薛晶晶, 等. 面向学术领域的新型社交平台:科研社交网络[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(9):167-172.
[18] 马晓敏. 科研团队学术交流与学科服务设计[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(17):77-84.
[19] 杨雨师, 刘万国. 学术交流新生态与高校图书馆进化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(14):47-52.
[20] 刘万国, 黄颖, 杨贺晴, 等. "学术交流新生态与图书馆转型" 国际学术研讨会综述[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2016(6):10-15.
[21] 韩丽, 王敏, 初景利. 生态学视角下开放获取驱动的学术交流系统变革研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017, 28(2):105-111.
[22] 孙希波. 开放存取对学术交流系统的影响[J]. 现代情报, 2009, 29(10):29-32.
[23] 乔冬梅. 国外学术交流于放存取发展综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2004, 48(11):74-78.
[24] 李建辉, 徐宏, 孙梦婕, 等. 学术期刊的OA模式及其对学术交流系统的影响[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2009(4):30-33.
[25] 崔海媛, 聂华, 吴越, 等. 公共资助机构开放获取政策研究与实施——以国家自然科学基金委员会基础研究知识库开放获取政策为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2017, 35(3):79-86.
[26] Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)[EB/OL].[2018-01-10]. https://doaj.org/.
[27] re3data.org[EB/OL].[2018-01-10]. https://www.re3data.org/.
[28] 李国杰. 大数据研究的科学价值[J]. 中国计算机学会通讯, 2012, 8(9):8-15.
[29] 朱维乔. 面向数据密集型科研范式的科学大数据服务平台构建研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2017(13):22-25.
[30] KRAMER B, BOSMAN J. Innovations in scholarly communication-global survey on research tool usage[EB/OL].[2018-01-10]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934514/.
[31] JEROEN B, BIANCA K. Swiss army knives of scholarly communication-researchgate, academia, mendeley and others[EB/OL].[2017-12-28]. https://101innovations.wordpress.com/2016/12/15/academic-social-networks-the-swiss-army-knives-of-scholarly-communication/.
[32] 杨现民, 骆娇娇, 刘雅馨, 等. 数据驱动教学:大数据时代教学范式的新走向[J]. 电化教育研究, 2017,38(12):13-20,26.
[33] 崔海媛, 聂华, 罗鹏程, 等. 资助机构开放获取知识库研究与构建——以国家自然科学基金基础研究知识库为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(11):45-54.
[34] 程维红, 任胜利. 国外学术期刊OA出版论文处理费(APC)调查[J].编辑学报, 2017, 29(2):192-195.
