[目的/意义] 构建针对我国地方政府开放数据的评估框架，对现有的地方政府开放数据平台上的数据层面进行评价并提出建议，以助推地方政府数据开放。[方法/过程] 根据政府数据开放的定义、原则与标准，借鉴国际开放数据评估框架，基于目前我国政府数据开放的政策要求和发展现状，汇聚各界专家学者的意见，构建起一个系统科学、多维度、可操作的政府数据开放评估框架，并基于该框架对我国现有的46个地方政府开放数据平台上的数据进行综合评估。[结果/结论] 研究发现我国地方政府开放的数据在数量、质量、标准、覆盖面和可持续性方面存在的各类问题。
[Purpose/significance] This paper attempts to construct an assessment framework on open government data at local government level, evaluate the data dimension on existing local government open data platforms in China and put forward suggestions to foster the opening of local government data.[Method/process] Based on the definitions, principles and standards of open data, learning from international open data assessment frameworks, taking in consideration of the policy requirement and development status of open data practices in China, this paper constructs a systematic, multi-dimensional and operable assessment framework, and carries out an actual assessment on forty-six local government open data platforms in China.[Result/conclusion] The study finds out a number of problems with regard to the quantity, quality, standard, coverage and sustainability of open data on local government platforms in China.
[1] 郑磊,开放政府数据的价值创造机理:生态系统的视角[J].电子政务,2015(7):2-7.
[2] The annotated 8 principles of open government data. Open government data principles[EB/OL].[2018-05-04]. https://public.resource.org/8_principles.html.
[3] Open definition. The open definition[EB/OL].[2018-05-04]. https://opendefinition.org.
[4] The World Bank. Open data essentials[EB/OL].[2018-05-04]. http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/essentials.html.
[5] Linked Data[EB/OL].[2017-08-15]. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
[6] Open Data Chapter. Principles[EB/OL].[2018-05-04]. https://opendatacharter.net/principles.
[7] OVIEDO E, MAZON J N, ZUBCOFF J J. Towards a data quality model for open data portals[C]//Computing Conference (CLEI), 2013 XXXIX Latin American computing conference. Naiguata:IEEE, 2013:1-8.
[8] VISCUSI G, SPAHIU B, MAURINO A, et al. Compliance with open government data policies:an empirical assessment of Italian Local Public Administrations[J]. Information polity, 2014, 19(3/4):263-275.
[9] LOURENÇO R P. An analysis of open government portals:a perspective of transparency for accountability[J]. Government information quarterly, 2015, 32(3):323-332.
[10] BELLO O, AKINWANDE V, JOLAYEMI O, et al. Open data portals in Africa:an analysis of open government data initiatives[J]. African journal of library, archives & information science, 2016, 26(2):97-106.
[11] The Gov Lab. Open data definitions[EB/OL].[2017-08-15]. http://odimpact.org/resources.html.
[12] SUSHA I, ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M, et al. Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption:usage, limitations, and lessons learned[J]. Social science computer review, 2015, 33(5):613-630.
[13] 夏义堃.国际组织开放政府数据评估方法的比较与分析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):75-83.
[14] 郑磊,关文雯.开放政府数据评估体系、指标与方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(18):43-55.
[15] 郑跃平,刘美岑.开放数据评估的现状及存在问题——基于国外开放数据评估的对比和分析[J].电子政务,2016(8):84-93.
[16] 陈美.开放政府数据价值评估:进展与启示[J].情报杂志,2017(11):92-98.
[17] 韦忻伶,安小米,李雪梅,等,开放政府数据评估体系述评:特点分析[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(18):119-127.
[18] 郑磊,高丰.中国开放政府数据平台研究:框架、现状与建议[J].电子政务,2015(7):8-16.
[19] 郑磊,熊久阳.中国地方政府开放数据研究:技术与法律特性[J].公共行政评论,2017(1):53-74.
[20] 夏义堃.国际比较视野下我国开放政府数据的现状、问题与对策[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(7):34-40.
[21] 赵继娣,张罕仑.地方政府数据开放成效评价研究——以上海市为例[J].电子政务,2017(9):11-21.
[22] 沈晶,韩磊,胡广伟.政府数据开放发展速度指数研究——基于我国省级政府数据开放平台的评估[J].情报杂志,2018(8):1-8.
[23] 海伦,邓崧.基于数据包络法的城市政府数据开放平台效率评估[J]. 电子政务,2018(8):112-118.
