情报研究

知识交流效率视角下图情期刊影响力评价

  • 张权 ,
  • 张艳华 ,
  • 王成军
展开
  • 1 西安建筑科技大学管理学院 西安 710055;
    2 西安邮电大学经济与管理学院 西安 710121
张权(ORCID:0000-0003-0446-5027),副教授,博士研究生,E-mail:zhangquan36@qq.com;张艳华(ORCID:0000-0001-7625-1007),副研究馆员;王成军(ORCID:0000-0002-8356-8528),教授,博士。

收稿日期: 2018-04-27

  修回日期: 2018-07-06

  网络出版日期: 2018-11-20

基金资助

本文系陕西省社会科学基金项目"陕西省科技创新效率、模式及实现路径研究"(项目编号:2016D040)和陕西省社会科学院信息学会科研培植项目"数字化教学资源的数据管理及应用课题"(项目编号:shshx201503)研究成果之一。

The Evaluation of Impact Power of Journals About Library and Information from the Perspective of Knowledge Exchanging Efficiency

  • Zhang Quan ,
  • Zhang Yanhua ,
  • Wang Chengjun
Expand
  • 1 School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055;
    2 School of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121

Received date: 2018-04-27

  Revised date: 2018-07-06

  Online published: 2018-11-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 从知识交流效率视角构建期刊影响力评价方法,为探索期刊影响力的多维指标评价及优化提供借鉴。[方法/过程] 运用DEA模型测算图书情报类期刊的知识交流效率,基于期刊效率的差异性与DEA方法的原理识别出期刊间的认可关系,构建认可网络并求解各节点的α中心度以表示期刊的影响力,运用期刊指标的相对强度值及其分类结果揭示期刊影响力的成因,并测算期刊知识交流的知识来源冗余率和传播及引证不足率。[结果/结论] 图书情报类期刊整体知识交流效率较高,但存在着差异性;期刊依据影响力的大小,分别位于期刊认可网络的中央、核心和边缘位置,受其他期刊的认可总数与认可程度依次递减;期刊分为学术热点、知识扩散、网络传播、国内影响、国际影响和改进型6种类型,国际影响力型的期刊较少;改进型期刊需要减少期刊知识来源冗余率和传播及引证不足率以提升期刊效率;提出提升期刊影响力的建议。

本文引用格式

张权 , 张艳华 , 王成军 . 知识交流效率视角下图情期刊影响力评价[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018 , 62(22) : 82 -90 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.22.010

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of knowledge exchange efficiency, this paper proposes a new evaluation method for impact power of journal and provides reference for exploring the multi-dimensional index evaluation and optimization for journal evaluation.[Method/process] Using DEA model to measure the knowledge exchange efficiency of library and information journal, based on the difference of efficiency and the principle of DEA method, the recognition relationship between journals was identified. Then the recognition network was constructed and α center degree of each node to represent the influence of the journal was solved. Using relative strength value of journal indexes and its classification results, the causes of the journal impact power was revealed, and the redundancy rate of knowledge sources and the shortage rate of dissemination and citation was measured.[Result/conclusion] The overall knowledge exchange efficiency of library and information journals is high, but there are differences. According to the order of journal impact power, different journals are located at the center, core and edge of the recognition network, and in the same order, the degree of recognition declines accordingly. Journals are divided into six types:academic hot spot, knowledge diffusion, network communication, domestic influence, international influence and improving type. Journals of improving type need to reduce the redundancy rate of knowledge sources and the shortage rate of dissemination and citation to improve their efficiency.

参考文献

[1] 伍军红,孙秀坤,孙隽,等.期刊影响力指数与影响因子评价国际期刊的比较研究[J].编辑学报,2017,29(5):500-504.
[2] 许海云,方曙.基于引文分布和引文网络的学术期刊评价指标研究[J].情报科学,2013,31(2):130-134,139.
[3] BRAUN T, GLÄNZEL W,SCHUBERT S.A hirsch-type index for journals-the scientist-magazine of the life sciences[J].The scientist,2005,19(22):8.
[4] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[5] BERGSTROM C T,WEST J D,WISEMAN M A.The eigenfactor metrics[J].Journal of neuroscience,2008,28(45):11433-11434.
[6] 陈铭.开放存取期刊评价模型构建[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(14):11-15.
[7] 董敏红.基于主成分分析的图书情报类核心期刊评价指标有效性研究[J].情报科学,2010,28(11):1670-1672,1678.
[8] 贺颖.2001-2004年中国管理类期刊学术影响力综合评价[J].中国软科学,2007,32(1):107-112,133.
[9] 岳洪江,刘思峰.管理科学期刊引证指标的灰色关联研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(1):61-65.
[10] 俞立平,刘爱军.主成分与因子分析在期刊评价中的改进研究[J].情报杂志,2014,33(12):94-98.
[11] 张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析-基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):516-521,615.
[12] 李琳,黄海军,汪寿阳.基于DEA/AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(4):118-126.
[13] 王惠,王树乔.图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(3):134-138,156.
[14] 吴美琴,李常洪,宋雅文,等.基于窗口分析与松弛变量测度的期刊引证效率评价——18种图情期刊效率差异分析[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(2):122-127.
[15] LIU J S, LU W M.DEA and ranking with the network-based approach:a case of R&D performance[J].Omega,2010,38(6):453-64.
[16] BANKER R D,CHARNES A,COOPER W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J].Management science,1984,30(9):1078-1092.
[17] 王晓珍,吉生保,党建民.基于改进网络DEA的战略性新兴产业再审视——以医疗器械产业和医药产业为例[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,35(5):69-80.
[18] 罗家德.社会网络分析讲义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.
[19] NOOY W D,MRVAR A,BATAGELI V. Exploratory social network analysis with pajek[M].New York:Cambridge university press,2005.
[20] KAMADA T,KAWAI S.An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs[J].Information processing letters,1989,31(1):7-15.
[21] BONACICH P.Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships[J].Sociological methodology,1972,4(4):176-185.
[22] BONACICH P, LLOYD P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations[J].Social networks, 2001,23(3):191-201.
[23] 李长玲,郭凤娇.几种中心性分析方法的学科期刊评价效果比较研究——以19种图书情报类核心期刊为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(5):115-120.
[24] 卢纹岱,朱红兵.SPSS统计分析[M].5版.北京:电子工业出版社,2015.
[25] 中国知网.中国学术期刊国际引证报告[R].2016版.北京:中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社,2016.
文章导航

/