图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 22: 91 - 99

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.22.011

情报研究

高校科学研究情境下人格特质对知识共享的影响——以目标导向为中介变量

  • 齐齐 ,
  • 赵树宽 ,
  • 余海晴 ,
  • 李其容
展开
  • 1 山东财经大学工商管理学院 济南 250014;
    2 吉林大学管理学院 长春 130022
齐齐(ORCID:0000-0001-6218-0703),讲师,博士,E-mail:qiqi131537@163.com;赵树宽(ORCID:0000-0002-4743-2092),教授,博士,博士生导师;余海晴(ORCID:0000-0002-4580-784X),副教授,博士;李其容(ORCID:0000-0002-7995-2084),副教授,博士。

收稿日期: 2018-02-27

  修回日期: 2018-07-27

  网络出版日期: 2018-11-20

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金青年项目"高管团队推动双元性创新的机理研究：基于认知差异化与认知整合化的框架"（项目编号：71602067）和吉林省教育厅"十二五"社会科学研究规划项目"吉林省高等教育生产率测度及提升对策研究"（项目编号：2014B018）研究成果之一。

收起

The Effect of Personality Traits on Knowledge Sharing in the Context of University Scientific Research: Based on Goal Orientation as Intermediaries

  • Qi Qi ,
  • Zhao Shukuan ,
  • Yu Haiqing ,
  • Li Qirong
Expand
  • 1 School of Business Administration, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014;
    2 School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022

Received date: 2018-02-27

  Revised date: 2018-07-27

  Online published: 2018-11-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 基于大五人格特质理论和目标导向理论，以学习导向和绩效导向为中介，构建高校教师人格特质差异对知识共享行为影响的模型。从人格特质和目标导向视角解释个体人格差异对知识共享行为的影响，有助于高校更好地激发高校教师在科学研究中的知识共享行为。[方法/过程] 通过对202名高校教师进行问卷调查，构建影响高校教师知识共享行为的概念模型，采用层次回归分析和Bootstrap方法进行检验。[结果/结论] 实证结果显示：①尽责性人格和亲和性人格对教师知识共享行为均有显著的积极影响，而开放性人格的影响不显著，其中尽责性人格的影响度最高；②学习导向和绩效导向在人格特质对知识共享行为的影响中起到部分中介作用；③相较于绩效导向，学习导向的中介效应更强，说明教师进行知识共享的学习动机更为强烈。

关键词： 人格特质; 知识共享; 高校科学研究; 学习导向; 绩效导向

本文引用格式

齐齐 , 赵树宽 , 余海晴 , 李其容 . 高校科学研究情境下人格特质对知识共享的影响——以目标导向为中介变量[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018 , 62(22) : 91 -99 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.22.011

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Based on theories of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits and goal orientations, using learning orientation and performance orientation as intermediaries, this study constructs the model of the effect of university teachers' personality traits difference on knowledge sharing. The study explains the effects of personality traits difference on knowledge sharing from the views of personality traits and goal orientations. The study contributes to universities stimulating teachers' knowledge sharing behavior of scientific research in a better way.[Method/process] The paper analyzed questionnaires from 202 university teachers using hierarchical regression analysis (HRA) and Bootstrap method.[Result/conclusion] The result indicates that:conscientiousness and agreeableness are positive associated with teachers' knowledge sharing behavior, and conscientiousness has the strongest effect whereas the effect of openness is not obvious; the relationship between personality traits and knowledge sharing is partially mediated by learning orientation and performance orientation; the mediating role of learning orientation is stronger than performance orientation, which reflects that motivation of teachers to share knowledge is stronger.

Key words： personality traits; knowledge sharing; university scientific research; learning orientation; performance orientation

参考文献

[1] 陈世平, 胡艳军. 高校教师知识共享的影响因素和应对策略[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 11(8):69-72.
[2] CHU M T, KRISHNAKUMAR P K, KHOSLA R. Mapping knowledge sharing traits to business strategy in knowledge based organisation[J]. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2014, 25(1):55-65.
[3] 王陆. 教师在线实践社区的知识共享与知识创新的机理分析[J]. 电化教育研究, 2015(5):101-107.
[4] 李贺, 张克永, 洪闯. 开放式创新社区创客知识共享影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(21):13-21.
[5] 周密, 刘倩, 梁安. 组织内成员间知识共享的影响因素研究[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10(10):1545-1552.
[6] 宋亚非, 师展, 冯殊伦. 组织承诺、知识共享和个体创新行为的关系研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2014(12):137-143.
[7] 李卫东, 刘洪. 研发团队成员信任与知识共享意愿的关系研究——知识权力丧失与互惠互利的中介作用[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(3):128-138.
[8] 王娟茹, 杨瑾. 信任、团队互动与知识共享行为的关系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(10):31-39.
[9] 孙凯, 柳艳婷, 刘晓婷. 研发团队知识异质性对知识共享影响研究[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 35(2):59-64.
[10] 杨齐. 伦理型领导、组织认同与知识共享:心理安全的调节中介作用[J]. 华东经济管理, 2014(1):123-127.
[11] 王立清, 李鸿飞. 企业文化与隐性知识共享关系研究——以唐车和西门子公司为代表的案例研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2014(10):93-98.
[12] 赵书松. 中国文化背景下员工知识共享的动机模型研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2013, 16(5):26-37.
[13] 黄彦婷, 段光, 杨忠,等. 物质奖励、集体主义文化对知识共享意愿的影响研究[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(3):78-81.
[14] MATZLER K, RENZL B, MÜLLER J, et al. Personality traits and knowledge sharing[J]. Journal of economic psychology, 2008, 29(3):301-313.
[15] 赵君. 人格特质对知识共享的影响:以组织信任为中介变量[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(5):34-38.
[16] 周志民, 张江乐, 熊义萍. 内外倾人格特质如何影响在线品牌社群中的知识分享行为——网络中心性与互惠规范的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(3):19-29.
[17] MEYER R D, DALAL R S, HERMIDA R. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences[J]. Journal of management, 2010, 36(1):121-140.
[18] TETT R P, GUTERMAN H A. Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency:testing a principle of trait activation[J]. Journal of research in personality, 2000, 34(4):397-423.
[19] WITT L A, BURKE L A, BARRICK M R, et al. The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2002, 87(1):164-169.
[20] ARGOTE L, INGRAM P. Knowledge transfer:a basis for competitive advantage in firms[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2000, 82(1):150-169.
[21] JOHN O P, SRIVASTAVA S. The big five trait taxonomy:history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives[J]. Handbook of personality:theory and research, 1999, 2(19):102-138.
[22] MATZLER K, RENZL B, MOORADIAN T, et al. Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing[J]. The international journal of human resource management, 2011, 22(2):296-310.
[23] LIN Q, LIN L, YE D. Factors influencing knowledge-sharing behaviors and learning effect:a multilevel investigation[J]. Social behavior and personality:an international journal, 2015, 43(10):1683-1698.
[24] 宋宝香, 林泉. 人格特质对知识共享影响机制实证研究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2014(14):102-103.
[25] SWIDER B W, ZIMMERMAN R D. Born to burnout:a meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes[J]. Journal of vocational behavior, 2010, 76(3):487-506.
[26] GOLDBERG L R. The structure of phenotypic personality traits[J]. American psychologist, 1993, 48(1):26-34.
[27] FARR J L, HOFMANN D A, RINGENBACH K L. Goal orientation and action control theory:implications for industrial and organizational psychology[J]. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 1993, 8(2):193-232.
[28] CHADWICK I C, RAVER J L. Motivating organizations to learn:goal orientation and its influence on organizational learning[J]. Journal of management, 2015, 41(3):957-986.
[29] BUTTON S B, MATHIEU J E, ZAJAC D M. Goal orientation in organizational research:a conceptual and empirical foundation[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1996, 67(1):26-48.
[30] DESHON R P, GILLESPIE J Z. A motivated action theory account of goal orientation[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2005, 90(6):1096-1127.
[31] JOHNSON P D, SHULL A, WALLACE J C. Regulatory focus as a mediator in goal orientation and performance relationships[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 2011, 32(5):751-766.
[32] DIERDORFF E C, ELLINGTON J K. Members matter in team training:multilevel and longitudinal relationships between goal orientation, self-regulation, and team outcomes[J]. Personnel psychology, 2012, 65(3):661-703.
[33] PORTER C O L H, FRANKLIN D A, SWIDER B W, et al. An exploration of the interactive effects of leader trait goal orientation and goal content in teams[J]. The leadership quarterly, 2016, 27(1):34-50.
[34] CHEN G, MATHIEU J E. Goal orientation dispositions and performance trajectories:the roles of supplementary and complementary situational inducements[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2008, 106(1):21-38.
[35] KOZLOWSKI S W J, BELL B S. Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting:effects on self-regulatory processes[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2006, 91(4):900-916.
[36] JOHNSON W, KRUEGER R F. Genetic and environmental structure of adjectives describing the domains of the big five model of personality:a nationwide US twin study[J]. Journal of research in personality, 2004, 38(5):448-472.
[37] COSTA P T, MCCREA R B. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI)[M]. New York:Springer, 1992.
[38] DIGMAN J M. Personality structure:emergence of the five-factor model[J]. Annual review of psychology, 1990, 41(1):417-440.
[39] ORGAN D W, RYAN K. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Personnel psychology, 1995, 48(4):775-802.
[40] LIAO H, CHUANG A. A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes[J]. Academy of management journal, 2004, 47(1):41-58.
[41] SWIFT M, BALKIN D B, MATUSIK S F. Goal orientations and the motivation to share knowledge[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2010, 14(3):378-393.
[42] HARRIS E G, MOWEN J C, BROWN T J. Re-examining salesperson goal orientations:personality influencers, customer orientation, and work satisfaction[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2005, 33(1):19-35.
[43] VERMETTEN Y J, LODEWIJKS H G, VERMUNT J D. The role of personality traits and goal orientations in strategy use[J]. Contemporary educational psychology, 2001, 26(2):149-170.
[44] KLEIN H J. An integrated control theory model of work motivation[J]. Academy of management review, 1989, 14(2):150-172.
[45] CHOI D, OH I S, COLBERT A E. Understanding organizational commitment:a meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2015, 100(5):1542-1567.
[46] DONNELLAN M B, OSWALD F L, BAIRD B M, et al. The mini-IPIP scales:tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality[J]. Psychological assessment, 2006, 18(2):192-203.
[47] COOPER A J, SMILLIE L D, CORR P J. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Mini-IPIP five-factor model personality scale[J]. Personality and individual differences, 2010, 48(5):688-691.
[48] MATZLER K, MUELLER J. Antecedents of knowledge sharing-examining the influence of learning and performance orientation[J]. Journal of economic psychology, 2011, 32(3):317-329.
[49] GORSUCH R. Factor analysis[M]. Hillsdale:Erlbaum, 1983.
[50] FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1):39-50.
[51] MACKINNON D P, LOCKWOOD C M, HOFFMAN J M, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects[J]. Psychological methods, 2002, 7(1):83-104.
[52] HAYES J R. The complete problem solver[M]. New York:Routledge, 2013.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉