[目的/意义]将知识融合的概念创新性地引入政府决策中，通过对具有多重决策支持价值的海量政府网站信息资源进行深度挖掘与利用，提高政府决策水平。[方法/过程]基于不同类型政府网站信息资源的决策支持价值，分析决策驱动的领域知识融合服务需求与功能定位，据此构建面向决策的政府网站信息资源领域知识融合服务模型，并以政府网站发布的“‘放管服’改革”领域相关信息资源的知识融合为例，对模型的应用场景进行案例描述。[结果/结论]模型能够为当前党政领导科学决策支持服务平台的建设提供新的视角、思路和途径。
[Purpose/significance] The concept of knowledge fusion is innovatively introduced into policy-making, through the in-depth excavation and utilization of massive government website information resources with multiple policy-making support values, to improve the level of policy-making.[Method/process] In view of the different policy-making support value of government website information resources, this paper analyzes the knowledge fusion service demand and function positioning in the policy-making process. Based on this, a knowledge fusion service model for policy-making of government website information resources is constructed, and takes the knowledge fusion of related government website information resources in the field of "reforms to streamline administration, delegate more powers, improve regulation and provide better services" as an example to describe the application scenario of the model.[Result/conclusion] The model can provide new perspectives, ideas and ways for the construction of the current party and government leadership scientific decision support service platform.
[1] 胡象明.公共部门决策的理论与方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2007.
[2] 谭必勇,王新才,吕元智.基于政府决策的政府信息资源管理研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2009, 32(4):37-40.
[3] 万接喜,董卫东,吴鹏.面向政府决策的政务信息资源组织[J].电子政务,2009(2):56-65.
[4] 王曰芬,邢梦婷.面向政府决策需求的社会舆情信息语义组织研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2016(S1):21-31.
[5] 王翠萍,侯璐.国外面向政府决策的信息资源开发现状分析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2017(13):17-21.
[6] LATHAM B. American libraries and the US federal government:an overview of partnerships for enhanced resource access[J]. Reference reviews, 2015, 29(8):2-6.
[7] KIM G H, TRIMI S, CHUNG J H. Big-data applications in the government sector[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2014, 57(3):78-85.
[8] 戎军涛,王莉瑛.面向政府危机决策的知识管理"情景-应对"机制研究[J].情报杂志,2016,35(5):188-194.
[9] 张斌,魏扣,郝琦.面向决策的档案知识库构建研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):118-124.
[10] ABDULRAHEEM M H, YUSOF S A B M. Employing a knowledge base in the decision making in e-government[J]. Advanced science letters, 2017, 23(6):38-41.
[11] PANAGIOTIS K, OURANIA M, SOTIRIOS K, et al. Towards more factual, evidence based, transparent and accountable policy evaluation and analysis:the policy compass approach[C]//eChallenges Conference 2014.Dublin:International Information Management Corporation,2014:222-231.
[12] 邱均平,余厚强.知识科学视角下国际知识融合研究进展与趋势[J].图书情报工作,2015, 59(8):126-132.
[13] 刘晓娟,李广建,化柏林.知识融合:概念辨析与界说[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(13):13-19.
[14] 高劲松,梁艳琪.关联数据环境下知识融合模型研究[J].情报科学,2016(2):50-54.
[15] 黄新平.政府网站信息资源多维语义知识融合研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2017.
[16] SMIRNOV A, LEVASHOVA T, SHILOV N. Patterns for context-based knowledge fusion in decision support systems[J]. Information fusion, 2015, 21(1):114-129.
[17] 周利琴,范昊,潘建鹏.基于知识融合过程的大数据知识服务框架研究[J].图书馆学研究,2017(21):53-59.
[18] 2017年国家统计局政府信息公开工作报告[EB/OL].[2018-07-19]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/ztjc/xxgkndbg/gjtjj/201803/t20180305_1586353.html.
[19] KRISHNAMURTHY R, AWAZU Y. Liberating data for public value:the case of Data.gov[J]. International journal of information management, 2016, 36(4):668-672.
[20] 2017年北京市政府信息公开工作年度报告[EB/OL].[2018-07-19]. http://zhengwu.beijing.gov.cn/zwzt/2017nb/t1511118.htm.
[21] 黄萃.政策文献量化研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[22] 我向总理说句话[EB/OL].[2018-03-16]. http://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2017wxzlsjh/index.htm.
[23] ANDEWEG R B, IRWIN G A. Governance and politics of the Netherlands[M].Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
[24] 郝淑红.政府决策过程的知识价值链[D].沈阳:东北大学,2006.
[25] 魏扣,郝琦,张斌.面向政府决策的档案知识库构建需求分析[J].档案学研究,2016(5):32-35.
[26] 吴鹏,苏新宁,邓三鸿.决策过程的知识价值链[J].中国图书馆学报,2005(2):25-29.
[27] 刘志国,吴倩,栾晓红.基于循证决策的企业知识管理研究[J].中国管理信息化,2015,18(11):99-101.
[28] CORRAO S, ARCORACI V, ARNONE S, et al. Evidence-based knowledge management:an approach to effectively promote good health-care decision-making in the information era[J]. Internal & emergency medicine, 2009, 4(2):99-106.
