理论研究

高校图书馆管理制度内化的理论构建——基于扎根理论的探索性研究

  • 朱明 ,
  • 廖熙铸
展开
  • 云南大学历史与档案学院 昆明 650091
朱明(ORCID:0000-0002-7711-7149),副教授,博士,E-mail:zmhave@163.com;廖熙铸(ORCID:0000-0003-1386-277X),硕士研究生

收稿日期: 2018-07-03

  修回日期: 2018-10-12

  网络出版日期: 2019-03-05

Theoretical Construction of Internalization of University Library Management System: An Exploratory Study Based on Grounded Theory

  • Zhu Ming ,
  • Liao Xizhu
Expand
  • School of history and Archives, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091

Received date: 2018-07-03

  Revised date: 2018-10-12

  Online published: 2019-03-05

摘要

[目的/意义]图书馆管理制度内化是图书馆资源配置和管理创新的基础,论文旨在还原管理制度在图书馆组织内部的内化过程,并对各层级间的转换机制进行解释。[方法/过程]通过对3所案例图书馆的扎根理论研究构建高校图书馆管理制度内化的理论模型,从组织内化、过程机制和馆员内化3个维度综合考察高校图书馆管理制度内化的动因和表现,具体涵盖11个主范畴、41个范畴和164个初始概念。[结果/结论]高校图书馆管理制度内化是在图书馆组织内部构建起组织适应的内化基础后,通过过程机制形成与馆员层面匹配与转化的选择集合,最终由馆员根据理性计算和群体共识对管理制度形成内化并转化为组织内部规范内化的过程。

本文引用格式

朱明 , 廖熙铸 . 高校图书馆管理制度内化的理论构建——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(5) : 32 -41 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.05.004

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The internalization of library management system is the foundation of Library resource allocation and management innovation. This study aims to restore the internalization process of the management system within the library organization, and to explain the transformation mechanism among various levels of library. [Method/process] This paper constructs d a theoretical model of internalization of university library management system through the grounded theory research of three case libraries, this theoretical model comprehensively inspects the motivation and performance of internalization of university library management system from three dimensions: organizational internalization, process mechanism and librarian internalization, which covers 11 main categories, 41 categories and 164 initial concepts. [Result/conclusion] For the internalization of university library management system, the internalization foundation of the organizational adaptation should be constructed within the library organization firstly, and then the selection sets that have be matched and transformed the librarian level should be formed through the process mechanism. Finally, the librarian makes the management system internalized and transferred according to the rational calculation and the group consensus internalizing the internal norms of the organization.

参考文献

[1] 朱明,张志东,周承聪.图书馆管理制度有效性研究的理论溯源[J].图书馆学研究,2016 (2):8-12.
[2] 朱明.高校图书馆管理制度有效性的理论构建——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].图书情报知识,2016(1):42-50.
[3] 朱明,郑雄.高校图书馆管理制度有效性量表的构建与检验[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(8):38-43.
[4] 朱明.国外图书馆管理制度有效性研究述评[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(18):142-147.
[5] REDMOND K M. Library planning and policy making[M]. NJ:Scarecrow Press, 1990:19-31.
[6] REBECCA B. The public library manager's forms, policies, and procedures handbook[M]. New york:Neal-Schuman, 2004:77-96.
[7] CHERYL A. Pricing policy for library services[J]. Journal of the american society for information science, 1979,28(4):304-311.
[8] PAUL T, JOHN C B, URSULA G. Wake up the nation:libraries, policy making, and political Discourse[J].The library quarterly,2013,81(1):61-72.
[9] 白君礼,崔旭. 图书馆制度执行力概念、要素蠡测[J]. 图书情报知识, 2014(1):62-70.
[10] BRIGHT K, CHANG A. Changing roles of middle managers in academic libraries[J].Library management,2012, 33(4):213-220.
[11] EZRA S, ZAKARI M. Digital preservation policy in national information centers in nigeria[J].The electronic library, 2013, 31(4):483-492.
[12] 柯平,张文亮,李西宁,等. 基于扎根理论的馆员对公共图书馆组织文化感知研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2013, 31(5):37-49.
[13] 希尔弗曼.如何做质性研究[M]. 李雪,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:4-5.
[14] ANSELM S, JULIET C. Basics of qualitative research:techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M].California:Sage,1998:55-57.
[15] 王璐,高鹏.扎根理论及其在管理学研究中的应用问题探讨[J].外国经济与管理,2010,32(12):10-18.
[16] STRAUSS A L.Qualitative analysis for social scientists[M].Cambridge:cambridge university press,1987:5-7.
[17] 陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-64.
[18] 胡幼蕙.质性研究:理论、方法及本土女性研究实例[M].台北:巨流图书公司,1994.
[19] CHENG H L. A Study on policy of university libraries in taiwan[J]. Journal of library and information science,2011,37(2):94-110.
[20] RIGGS D E.The crisis and opportunities in library leadership[J].Journal of library administration,2001,32(3/4):5-17.
[21] STEVEN B, FIONNUALA C. Evaluating the strategic plans of public libraries:an inspection-based approach[J]. Library & information science research,2012,34:125-130.
[22] TRIDA K.A positive approach to change:the role of appreciative inquiry in library and information organisations[J]. Australian academic & research libraries.2010,43(3):163-177.
[23] JOHN S. Academic libraries and the global information society[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2007, 33(6):710-713.
[24] GAIL S. Libraries as distributors of geospatial data:data management policies as tools for managing partnerships[J]. Library trends, 2006,55(2):264-284.
[25] KREITZ P A. Leadership and emotional intelligence:a study of university library directors and their senior management teams[J]. College and research libraries, 2009, 70(6):531-550.
[26] POWELSON S, REAUME D. Using the results of a satisfaction survey to demonstrate the impact of a new library service model[J]. Health information and libraries journal,2012,29(3):223-232.
[27] DANESHGAR F. An integrated customer knowledge management framework for academic libraries[J].library quarterly, 2012, 82(1):7-28.
[28] ROBERT C. Internet use policies and the public library:a case study of a policy failure[J].Public library quarterly,2003,22(3):5-20.
[29] BUCKLAND K. Reference library service in the digital environment[J]. Library & information science research,2008,30(2):81-85.
[30] SATO C. Academic library service for the next decade[J]. Library and information science,2007,58:1-27.
文章导航

/

〈 〉