图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2019 , Vol. 63 >Issue 5: 100 - 109

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.05.012

情报研究

专利引用关系形成的解释框架:一个指数随机图模型视角

  • 杨冠灿 ,
  • 陈亮 ,
  • 张静 ,
  • 李纲
展开
  • 1 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872;
    2 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038;
    3 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
杨冠灿(ORCID:0000-0002-1706-1884),讲师,博士,E-mail:yanggc@ruc.edu.cn;陈亮(ORCID:0000-0002-3235-9806),副研究员,博士;张静(ORCID:0000-0003-0291-0959),副研究员,博士;李纲(ORCID:0000-0001-5573-6400),教授,博士,博士生导师

收稿日期: 2018-07-23

  修回日期: 2018-11-15

  网络出版日期: 2019-03-05

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金项目"基于指数随机图模型的专利引用关系形成影响因素及机理研究"（项目编号：71403256）和国家自然科学基金项目"面向专利文本中实体关系抽取的远程监督方法研究"（项目编号：71704169）研究成果之一

收起

Framework for Explanations of Patent Citation Formation: An Exponential Random Graph Model Perspective

  • Yang Guancan ,
  • Cheng Liang ,
  • Zhang Jing ,
  • Li Gang
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Resource Management of Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    2 Institute of Science and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038;
    3 School of Information Management of Wuhan University, Hubei 430072

Received date: 2018-07-23

  Revised date: 2018-11-15

  Online published: 2019-03-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]近年来，围绕着专利引文网络结构特征的研究出现大量的研究成果，这些成果都从某种程度上折射出专利引文关系的形成受到来自属性特征之外关系特征的影响，而现有的以回归方法为基础的统计推断方法难以将这些因素纳入到分析框架中，因此，急需探索新的方法。[方法/过程]从关系形成视角，专利引用关系形成可表示三种广义的关系形成过程：自组织影响过程、自身属性影响过程、网络协变量影响过程，并建立关系形成过程与网络配置间的映射关系，最终，形成一整套可用于理解复杂专利引用关系形成问题的解释框架。[结果/结论]提出一整套可用于理解复杂专利引用关系形成问题的解释框架，该框架是未来进一步构建网络统计模型的理论基础，另外，解释框架包含丰富的网络配置项，预示着未来指数随机图模型在文献计量、科学网络分析上广阔的应用前景。

关键词： 专利引用关系形成; 解释框架; 统计网络模型

本文引用格式

杨冠灿 , 陈亮 , 张静 , 李纲 . 专利引用关系形成的解释框架:一个指数随机图模型视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(5) : 100 -109 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.05.012

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Although there have been efforts of scholars to answer the question, what’s determinants of patent citation formation are not solved satisfactorily. Scholars find formation of patent citation is influenced by the structure characteristics of patent citation network. However, the current framework of statistical inference methods based on logistical regression is failing to incorporate the above factors, so an innovative method need to be introduced. [Method/process] From a tie formation perspective, patent citation formation represents three broad category of tie formation processes: attribute-based processes, self-organizing network processes and covariates processes. Furthermore, based on these processes, the paper establishes a mapping relationship between those processes with particular types of configurations. Finally, a framework is proposed for understanding the complexity of patent citation formation. [Result/conclusion] The paper introduces a framework for understanding patent citation formation, which lays the groundwork for statistical network modeling in the future. In addition, broadly network configuration selection from the framework offers significant opportunities to extend existing bibliometrics and open new pathways in complexity of scientific network analysis.

Key words： patent citations formation; framework for explanations; statistical network analysis

参考文献

[1] OECD. OECD Patent Statistics Manual[M]. Paris:OECD Publishing, 2009:14-16.
[2] YANG G C, LI G, LI C Y. Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3):1319-1346.
[3] VAN RANN A F J. Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation:a review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2017, 2(1):545-38.
[4] SHUMATE M, PALAZZOLO E T. Exponential random graph (p*) models as a method for social network analysis in communication research[J]. Communication methods and measures, 2010, 4(4):341-371.
[5] ROBINS G, PATTISON P, KALISH Y. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks[J]. Social Networks, 2007, 29(2):173-191.
[6] GOODREAU S M, HANDCOCK M S, BUTTS C T. Statnet:software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data[J]. Journal of statistical software, 2008, 24(1):1-11.
[7] LUSHER D, KOSKINEN J, ROBINS G. Exponential random graph models for social networks[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2012:16-28.
[8] HARRIS J K. An introduction to exponential random graph modeling[M]. London:SAGE Publications, 2013:1-13.
[9] JAFFE A B, DE RASSENFOSSE G. Patent citation data in social science research:overview and best practices[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(6):1360-1374.
[10] NARIN F, CARPENTER M P, WOOLF P. Technological performance assessments based on patents and patent citations[J]. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 1984, EM-31(4):172-183.
[11] TRAJTENBERG M. A penny for your quotes:patent citations and the value of innovations[J]. The RAND journal of economics, 1990, 21(1):172-187.
[12] HALL B H, JAFFE A B, TRAJTENBERG M. The NBER patent citation data file:lessons, insights and methodological tools[R]. Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.
[13] ALCÁCER J, GITTELMAN M, SAMPAT B. Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents:an overview and analysis[J]. Research policy, 2009, 38(2):415-427.
[14] ALCÁCER J, GITTELMAN M. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows:the influence of examiner citations[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 2006, 88(4):774-779.
[15] JAFFE A B, TRAJTENBERG M. Patents, citations, and innovations:a window on the knowledge economy[M]. New York:MIT Press, 2002:4-19.
[16] CRISCUOLO P, NARULA R, VERSPAGEN B. Role of home and host country innovation systems in R&D internationalisation:a patent citation analysis[J]. Economics of innovation and new technology, 2005, 14(5):417-433.
[17] OWEN-SMITH J, POWELL W W. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences:Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity[J]. Research policy, 2003, 32(9):1695-1711.
[18] GUAN J C, GAO X. Exploring the h-index at patent level[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(1):35-40.
[19] BRUSONI S, CRISCUOLO P, GEUNA A. The knowledge bases of the world's largest pharmaceutical groups:What do patent citations to non-patent literature reveal?[J]. Economics of innovation and new technology, 2005, 14(5):395-415.
[20] CHANG S B, LAI K K, CHANG S M. Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods:using the patent citation network[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2009, 76(1):107-117.
[21] GRESS B. Properties of the USPTO patent citation network:1963-2002[J]. World patent information, 2010, 32(1):3-21.
[22] STERNITZKE C, BARTKOWSKI A, SCHRAMM R. Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools[J]. World patent information, 2008, 30(2):115-131.
[23] HUANG M H, CHIANG L Y, CHEN D Z. Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling:a study of Taiwan's high-tech companies[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3):489-506.
[24] EGGHE L, ROUSSEAU R. Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 55(3):349-361.
[25] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation:which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12):2389-2404.
[26] HU X, ROUSSEAU R, CHEN J. On the definition of forward and backward citation generations[J]. Journal of informatics, 2011, 5(1):27-36.
[27] ATALLAH G, RODRÍGUEZ G. Indirect patent citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 67(3):437-465.
[28] HUNG S W, WANG A P. Examining the small world phenomenon in the patent citation network:a case study of the radio frequency identification (RFID) network[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 82(1):121-134.
[29] BRANTLE T F, FALLAH M H. Complex innovation networks, patent citations and power laws[C]//2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. Piscataway:IEEE, 2007:540-549.
[30] SMILKOV D, KOCAREV L. Rich-club and page-club coefficients for directed graphs[J]. Physica A:statistical mechanics and its applications, 2010, 389(11):2290-2299.
[31] LESKOVEC J, KLEINBERG J, FALOUTSOS C. Graphs over time:densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations[C]//Proceeding of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference. New York:ACM, 2005:177-187.
[32] WANG J C, CHIANG C H, LIN S W. Network structure of innovation:can brokerage or closure predict patent quality?[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(3):735-748.
[33] WHITE H D, WELLMAN B, NAZER N. Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2004, 55(2):111-126.
[34] SHIBATA N, KAJIKAWA Y, TAKEDA Y. Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(3):571-580.
[35] YAN E, DING Y. Scholarly network similarities:How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(7):1313-1326.
[36] THOMPSON P. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers:evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 2006, 88(2):383-388.
[37] BOTTAZZI L, PERI G. Innovation and spillovers in regions:evidence from European patent data[J]. European Economic review, 2003, 47(4):687-710.
[38] CHEN D Z, HUANG M H, HSIEH H C. Identifying missing relevant patent citation links by using bibliographic coupling in LED illuminating technology[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(3):400-412.
[39] MORRIS S A, VAN DER VEER MARTENS B. Mapping research specialties[J]. Annual review of information science and technology, 2008, 42(1):213-295.
[40] BRAAM R R, MOED H F, VAN RAAN A F J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1991, 42(4):233-251.
[41] CRISCUOLO P, VERSPAGEN B. Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents[J]. Research policy, 2008, 37(10):1892-1908.
[42] BAKKER J. The log-linear relation between patent citations and patent value[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 110(2):1-14.
[43] LEE Y G, LEE J D, SONG Y I. An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model:the case of KIST[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(1):27-39.
[44] NICOLAISEN J. Citation analysis[J]. Annual review of information science and technology, 2007, 41(1):609-641.
[45] YOON B, PARK Y. A text mining based patent network:analytical tool for high-technology trend[J]. The journal of high technology management research, 2004, 15(1):37-50.
[46] LEE W J, LEE W K, SOHN S Y. Patent network analysis and quadratic assignment procedures to identify the convergence of robot technologies[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(10):e0165091.
[47] SNIJDERS T A B, PATTISON P E, ROBINS G L. New specifications for exponential random graph models[J]. Sociological methodology, 2006, 36(1):99-153.
[48] ROSE KIM J Y, HOWARD M, COX PAHNKE E. Understanding network formation in strategy research:exponential random graph models[J]. Strategic management journal, 2016, 37(1):22-44.
[49] ROBINS G. Doing social network research[M]. London:SAGE, 2015:81-85.
[50] MORRIS M, HUNTER D R, HANDCOCK M S. Specification of exponential-family random graph models:terms and computational aspects[J]. Journal of statistical software. 2008, 24(4):1548-7660.
[51] BATAGELJ V. Efficient Algorithms for citation network analysis[EB/OL].[2017-12-06]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1956732_Efficient_Algorithms_for_Citation_Network_Analysis.
[52] DERNIS H, HOISL K, WEBB C. Analysing European and international patent citations[EB/OL].[2017-12-06]. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/analysing-european-and-international-patent-citations_883002633010.
[53] MEYER M. What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 49(1):93-123.
[54] COCKBURN I M, KORTUM S, STERN S. Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of examiner characteristics[R]. Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.
[55] ZHANG C, BU Y, DING Y. Understanding scientific collaboration:homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(1):72-86.
[56] ROBINS G, PATTISON P, WANG P. Closure, connectivity and degree distributions:exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks[J]. Social Networks, 2009, 31(2):105-117.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉