情报研究

基于系统动态学方法的弱信号生命周期建模与仿真

  • 董尹 ,
  • 刘千里 ,
  • 宋继伟
展开
  • 1. 合肥学院管理系 合肥 230601;
    2. 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210233;
    3. 南京大学中国南海研究协同创新中心 南京 210023
董尹(ORICD:0000-0003-3444-5705),副教授,博士,E-mail:dy_asaka@qq.com;刘千里(ORICD:0000-0002-7283-3728),讲师,博士;宋继伟(ORICD:0000-0001-5609-0162),助理研究员,博士。

收稿日期: 2018-08-30

  修回日期: 2019-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2019-07-05

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目"弱信号生命周期视角下的供应链风险信号识别研究"(项目编号:71603069)和国家社会科学基金青年项目"意义构建视野下安全情报的弱信号研究"(项目编号:15CTQ032)研究成果之一。

The Life Cycle of Weak Signals Modeling and Simulation Using System Dynamics Approach

  • Dong Yin ,
  • Liu Qianli ,
  • Song Jiwei
Expand
  • 1. Department of Management, Hefei University, Hefei 230601;
    2. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
    3. Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

Received date: 2018-08-30

  Revised date: 2019-02-20

  Online published: 2019-07-05

摘要

[目的/意义]为增强弱信号的内涵研究,对其全生命周期过程下的各阶段要素以及要素间的联系进行探寻,以期获得一定程度上的理论贡献,同时也为相关组织在开展弱信号管理实践时提供理论指导。[方法/过程]在对弱信号概念研究现状进行梳理的基础上,结合意义构建理论给出了弱信号概念界定。随后,通过与信息生命周期、新兴议题生命周期进行类比,提出弱信号生命周期理念。进而采用系统动态学方法开展系统思考,使用因果回路图进行系统建模,运用存量流量图进行仿真模拟。[结果/结论]弱信号生命周期包含4个阶段:侦测、关联、传递、抉择,相应的系统动态学模型所具备的现实性得到验证,且通过情景模拟确认了4个关键辅助变量:外界噪声干扰程度、弱信号分析效率、组织内相互信任程度、决策者信任程度。在整体研究的基础上,给出弱信号管理过程中可能会遇到的障碍以及应对策略。

本文引用格式

董尹 , 刘千里 , 宋继伟 . 基于系统动态学方法的弱信号生命周期建模与仿真[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(13) : 75 -84 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.13.008

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper explores the elements in stages of weak signals life cycle and relationship between them, to enhance the connotation research of weak signals and get theoretical contribution to a certain extent, hoping to give theoretical guidance to some organizations in weak signals management.[Method/process] Firstly, this paper has a literature review on weak signals concept. Then it presents a concept of weak singles in the context of intelligence studies and in combination with sense-making theory. Secondly, it proposes the life cycle of weak singles by analogy of the information life cycle and emerging issues life cycle. Thirdly, modeling and simulating by systems thinking and System Dynamics (SD) tools which are Causal Loop Diagram and Stock-flow Diagram.[Result/conclusion] Verifying the weak signals life cycle has 4 stages:detection, relevance, transmission, choice. Testing the feasibility of SD model and 4 critical auxiliary variables by scenario simulation, such as noise interference, analysis efficiency, trust degree in organization, and trust degree in decision makers. Moreover, it takes some barriers of weak signals management and solutions based on this research.

参考文献

[1] 董尹, 刘千里, 宋继伟, 等. 弱信号研究综述:概念、方法和工具[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(10):147-154.
[2] WEICK K E. Sensemaking in organization[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications Inc., 1995.
[3] CORNELISSEN J P. Sensemaking under pressure:the influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense[J]. Organization science, 2012, 23(1):118-137.
[4] 曾忠禄. 情报分析:定义、意义构建与流程[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(2):189-196.
[5] 维克. 组织社会心理学[M]. 贾柠瑞, 高隽, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2009.
[6] BRIZON A, WYBO J L. The life cycle of weak signals related to safety[J]. International journal of emergency management, 2009, 6(2):117-135.
[7] ANSOFF H I, MCDONNELL E J. Implanting strategic management[M]. New York:Prentice-Hall International Inc., 1984.
[8] HILTUNEN E. Was it a wild card or just our blindness to gradual change?[J]. Journal of futures studies, 2006, 11(2):61-74.
[9] DAY G S, SCHOEMAKER P J H. Peripheral vision:detecting the weak signals that will make or break your company[M]. Boston:Harvard Business Press, 2006.
[10] 刘千里. 组织社会心理学视野中的情报信号意义构建分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 34(4):27-30.
[11] PONOMAREVA J, SOKOLOVA A. The identification of weak signals and wild cards in foresight methodology:stages and methods[EB/OL].[2017-12-15].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2655520_code1767127.pdf.
[12] MEISSNER P, BRANDS C, WULF T. Quantifying blind spots and weak signals in executive judgment:a structured integration of expert judgment into the scenario development process[J]. International journal of forecasting, 2017, 33(1):244-253.
[13] 索传军. 试论信息生命周期的概念及研究内容[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(13):5-9.
[14] HILTUNEN E. The future sign and its three dimensions[J]. Futures, 2008, 40(3):247-260.
[15] KUUSI O, HILTUNEN E. The signification process of the future sign[J]. Journal of futures studies, 2011, 16(1):47-66.
[16] WYGANT A C, MARKLEY O W. Information and the future:a handbook of sources and strategies[M]. Westport:Greenwood Press, 1998.
[17] 梅多斯. 系统之美:决策者的系统思考[M]. 邱昭良, 译. 杭州:浙江人民出版社, 2012.
[18] 董尹, 杨阳. 基于系统动力学的竞争情报流程研究[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(12):1302-1311.
[19] 张爽. 基于系统动力学的房地产市场风险预警系统研究[D]. 济南:济南大学, 2017.
[20] 赵辉, 董骅, 屈微璐. 构建基于改进系统动力学的环保PPP项目风险动态评价体系[J]. 财会月刊, 2017(27):65-71.
[21] 张诚. 中小企业供应链金融风险测控的研究——基于系统动力学仿真模型[J].系统科学学报, 2018, 26(3):76-80.
[22] SWETS J A, GREEN D M, GETTY D J, et al. Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation[J]. Perception & psychophysics, 1978, 23(4):275-289.
[23] 沈固朝. 信号分析:竞争情报研究的又一重要课题[J]. 图书情报工作, 2009, 53(20):11-14.
[24] OCASIO W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic management journal, 1997, 18(S1):187-206.
[25] OCASIO W. Attention to attention[J]. Organization science, 2011, 22(5):1286-1296.
[26] KIRZNER I M. Competition and entrepreneurship[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1978.
[27] 刘千里. 情报信号意义构建研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2011.
[28] 斯特曼. 商务动态分析方法[M]. 朱岩, 钟永光, 译. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2008.
[29] 许科. 风险视角的信任研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2008:92.
文章导航

/

〈 〉