情报研究

学科领域科研产出的空间分布规律研究——以计算机软件与应用学科为例

  • 马超 ,
  • 李纲 ,
  • 毛进 ,
  • 谷岩松
展开
  • 武汉大学信息资源研究中心 武汉 430072
马超(ORCID:0000-0002-3425-993X),博士研究生;李纲(ORCID:0000-0001-5573-6400),主任,教授,博士生导师;谷岩松(ORCID:0000-0001-9403-7442),博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2018-12-28

  修回日期: 2019-04-02

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-05

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金重大课题"国家安全大数据综合信息集成与分析方法"(项目编号:71790612)和中国博士后科学基金项目"融合语义与关系的科研社群识别与演化研究"(项目编号:2018M630885)研究成果之一。

Research on the Spatial Distribution of Scientific Research Output: Taking the Computer Software and Application Field as an Example

  • Ma Chao ,
  • Li Gang ,
  • Mao Jin ,
  • Gu Yansong
Expand
  • Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2018-12-28

  Revised date: 2019-04-02

  Online published: 2019-08-05

摘要

[目的/意义]探究学科领域科研产出在空间上的分布情况,发掘其空间分布是否存在自相关性,分析其形成空间聚集的影响因素。[方法/过程]基于计算机领域核心期刊从1997-2016年间的题录数据,提取机构地理位置信息,以此为观测点,对其分布情况进行可视化呈现,并测算基尼指数和中心性指数,研究其分布集中情况;通过测算全局莫兰指数和局部自相关指标,研究其空间自相关规律;通过测算皮尔森相关系数,研究其与地区高校数量、国民生产总值、研究与试验投入和行业从业人员数量的相关性。[结果/结论]计算机领域核心期刊论文产出呈现出地理位置分布不均衡,有明显集中态势,且存在空间自相关性,同时与地区该学科高水平高校数量、行业从业人员数量和科研人员数量相关性较高。

本文引用格式

马超 , 李纲 , 毛进 , 谷岩松 . 学科领域科研产出的空间分布规律研究——以计算机软件与应用学科为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(15) : 94 -102 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.15.011

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The extensive development of scientific research cooperation will inevitably lead to the imbalance of regional scientific research output. In order to explore its distribution, the paper analyzed the causes of differences, and studied the spatial distribution of regional scientific research output.[Method/process] Based on the bibliographic data of the computer field from 1997-2016, the geographical location information of the organization is extracted, and the observation point was used to visualize the distribution, and the Gini index and the centrality index are measured to study the distribution concentration. By measuring the global Moran index and local autocorrelation index, the spatial autocorrelation law was studied. By measuring the Pearson correlation coefficient, the correlation between the number of colleges and universities, the gross national product, the research and experimental input, and the population was studied.[Result/conclusion] The output of journals in the computer field showed an uneven geographical distribution, a clear concentration, and spatial autocorrelation. Meanwhile, it had a high correlation with the number of regional universities and regional research and experimental funding.

参考文献

[1] BORNMANN L, WALTMAN L. The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science-a visualization approach by using density maps[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(4):547-553.
[2] MATTHIESSEN C W, SCHWARZ A W. Scientific centres in Europe:an analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators[J]. Urban studies, 1999, 36(3):453-477.
[3] ZHOU P, THIJS B, GLÄNZEL W. Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3):839-857.
[4] MABE M. The growth and number of journals[J]. Serials, 2003, 16(2):191-197.
[5] 胡昌平,胡吉明.领域研究合作网络的地理可视化——以《中国图书馆学报》为案例数据[J].情报科学,2018,36(2):3-8.
[6] TOBLER W R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region[J]. Economic geography, 1970, 46(S1):234-240.
[7] DORMANN C F, MCPHERSON J M, ARAUJO M B, et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data:a review[J]. Ecography, 2007, 30(5):609-628.
[8] BOTTAZZI L, PERI G. Innovation and spillovers in regions:Evidence from European patent data[J]. European economic review, 2003, 47(4):687-710.
[9] FRENKEN K, HARDEMAN S, HOEKMAN J. Spatial scientometrics:towards a cumulative research program[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3(3):222-232.
[10] FELDMAN M P, AUDRETSCH D B. Innovation in cities:Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition[J]. European economic review, 1999, 43(2):409-429.
[11] 李惠芬. 城市创新力指标体系的建构及实证研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2010(7):15-20.
[12] 张协奎, 邬思怡. 基于"要素-结构-功能-环境"的城市创新力评价研究——以17个国家创新型试点城市为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(2):138-144.
[13] 曹勇, 曹轩祯, 罗楚珺, 等. 我国四大直辖城市创新能力及其影响因素的比较研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(6):162-170.
[14] 史欣向,冯莉,梁彤缨.中国现有的研发资源与科研产出的关系——基于第二次全国R&D资源清查数据的实证研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(10):1-8.
[15] 杨军,伏琳,林艺文,等.浅析高等学校科研投入与产出[J].科技管理研究, 2013, 33(16):102-106.
[16] 吴杨,何光荣,何晋秋.高校科研投入与产出的相关性分析:1991-2008[J].清华大学教育研究, 2011, 32(4):104-112.
[17] 中国科学技术大学.中国科学技术大学官方网站[EB/OL].[2018-11-01]. https://www.ustc.edu.cn.
[18] AUDRETSCH D B, FELDMAN M P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J]. The American economic review, 1996, 86(3):630-640.
[19] WANG Y, HU R, LIU M. The geotemporal demographics of academic journals from 1950 to 2013 according to Ulrich's database[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(3):655-671.
[20] 胡祖光.基尼系数理论最佳值及其简易计算公式研究[J]. 经济研究, 2004, 9(1):60-69.
[21] ANSELIN L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA[J]. Geographical analysis, 1995, 27(2):93-115.
[22] 蔡翔,崔晓兰,熊静,等.我国地区R&D效率及其影响因素探究——基于"科研产出-成果转化"视角[J].软科学,2013,27(3):80-84.
[23] BOSCHMA R. Proximity and innovation:a critical assessment[J]. Regional studies, 2005, 39(1):61-74.
[24] 李佳哲,胡咏梅.国内高校科研效率和生产率研究述评及研究展望[J]. 现代教育管理, 2018(01):54-61.
文章导航

/