图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2019 , Vol. 63 >Issue 15: 127 - 139

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.15.015

综述述评

国际科研合作对科研绩效的影响研究综述

  • 陈秀娟 ,
  • 张志强
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041;
    2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100049
陈秀娟(ORCID:0000-0002-8063-7647),博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2018-09-24

  修回日期: 2018-12-14

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"面向领域知识发现的学科信息学理论与应用研究"（项目编号：17ATQ008）研究成果之一。

收起

A Review of the Impact of International Collaboration on Research Performance

  • Chen Xiujuan ,
  • Zhang Zhiqiang
Expand
  • 1. Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
    2. Department of Library Information and Archives Management, School of economics and management, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2018-09-24

  Revised date: 2018-12-14

  Online published: 2019-08-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]科研合作是不同科研主体之间围绕特定科学问题开展研究的协同研究工作，以实现科研主体间的优势互补。国际科研合作对促进科研绩效具有重要意义。了解当前国际科研合作对科研绩效影响研究的现状，为未来进一步开展该方面的研究提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]论文在界定国际科研合作、科研绩效两个重要概念的基础上，从研究层次、分析指标、分析方法3个维度对国际科研合作对科研绩效影响研究的论文进行梳理。[结果/结论]分析发现，目前该研究领域成果丰富，国内外学者主要从宏观（国家、地区或区域等）、中观（领域或机构、团队等）、微观（科研人员个体）3个层面，通过简单计数类和单一比值类国际科研合作指标以及科研产出数量类、科研产出质量类和h指标类科研绩效指标，采用文献计量学方法、社会网络分析方法及统计学分析的方法对国际科研合作对科研绩效的影响进行探析。未来需加强：科学家层面的研究，拓宽更多科研合作行为的分析；表征科研合作和科研绩效综合类指标的探索；针对性分析模型的创建，并对一些具有重要意义的变量进行控制。

关键词： 国际科研合作; 科研绩效; 科研生产力; 产出数量; 产出质量

本文引用格式

陈秀娟 , 张志强 . 国际科研合作对科研绩效的影响研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(15) : 127 -139 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.15.015

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Research collaboration is a collaborative research work between different scientific research subjects on specific scientific issues to achieve complementary advantages. International research collaboration is of great significance to promote research performance. Understanding the current research status of the impact of international collaboration on research performance will provide a reference for the future research.[Method/process] This paper analyzes the literature about the impact of international collaboration on research performance from research sample, analysis indicators and analysis method based on the definition of international collaboration and research performance.[Result/conclusion] The analysis results show that the research field is rich in results at present. Domestic and international scholars are mainly from the macro (country or regional, etc.), meso (fields or institutions, teams, etc.) and micro (individuals) -3 levels, using bibliometric, social network analysis and statistical analysis to study on the impact of international collaboration on research performance,with the help of rich international collaboration indicators (simple count indicators and single ratio indictors) and research performance indicators (quantity indicators, quality indictors and indictors like h-index). The research needs to be strengthened including studying at the level of scientists and broadening the analysis based on more research collaboration behaviors; exploring comprehensive indicators of research collaboration and research performance; creating targeted analysis models and controlling some important variables.

Key words： international research collaboration; research performance; research productivity; output quantity; output quality

参考文献

[1] PRICE D. Little science, big science[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1963.
[2] 陈强教授课题组. 主要发达国家的国际科技合作研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2015.
[3] 科技部出台『十五』期间国际科技合作发展纲要[J]. 中国石油和化工, 2001(2):10-11.
[4] 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020年)[EB/OL].[2018-06-15]. http://www.most.gov.cn/mostinfo/xinxifenlei/gjkjgh/200811/t20081129_65774.htm.
[5] National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2018[R]. Alexandria, VA:National Science Foundation, 2018.
[6] HE T. International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(3):571-582.
[7] 中国科技网.《中国国际科研合作现状报告》在京发布[EB/OL].[2018-06-19]. http://www.stdaily.com/cxzg80/kebaojicui/2017-07/03/content_557905.shtml.
[8] 浦墨, 袁军鹏, 岳晓旭,等. 国际合作科学计量研究的国际现状综述[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015(6):56-68.
[9] BARJAK F, ROBINSON S. International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences:impact on research performance[J]. Social geography, 2008, 3(1):23-36.
[10] ADAMS J D, BLACK G C, CLEMMONS J R, et al. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations:Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999[J]. Research policy, 2005, 34(3):259-285.
[11] GONZALEZ-BRAMBILA C N, VELOSO F M, KRACKHARDT D. The impact of network embeddedness on research output[J]. Research policy, 2013, 42(9):1555-1567.
[12] KATZ J S, MARTIN B R. What is research collaboration?[J]. Research policy, 1997, 26(1):1-18.
[13] ZIMAN J. Prometheus bound:Science in a dynamic steady state[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[14] HEFFNER A G. Funded research, multiple authorship, and sub authorship collaboration in four disciplines[J]. Scientometrics, 1981, 3(1):5-12.
[15] 赵蓉英, 温芳芳. 科研合作与知识交流[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(20):6-10.
[16] 樊春良. 关于国际科学合作过程与效益的案例研究——基于国家自然科学基金国际合作项目的案例[J]. 中国科学基金, 2015(2):129-134.
[17] KATZ J S, HICKS D. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model[J]. Scientometrics, 1997, 40(3):541-554.
[18] MA N, GUAN J. An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3):343-355.
[19] HAYATI Z, DIDEGAH F. International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998-2007[J]. Library hi tech, 2010, 28(3):433-446.
[20] 王文平. 基于科学计量的中国国际科技合作模式及影响研究[D]. 北京:北京理工大学, 2014.
[21] ARUNACHALAM S, SRINIVASAN R, RAMAN V. International collaboration in science:Participation by the Asian giants[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 30(1):7-22.
[22] ADAMS J, GURNEY K, MARSHALL S. Patterns of international collaboration for the UK and leading partners[R]. Report commissioned by the UK Office of Science and Innovation, Evidence Ltd., 2007.
[23] GUERRERO BOTE V P, OLMEDA-GÓMEZ C, MOYA-ANEGÓN F. Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(2), 392-404.
[24] LANCHO-BARRANTES B S, GUERRERO-BOTE V P, MOYA-ANEGÓN F D. Citation increments between collaborating countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3):817-831.
[25] BORDONS M, GÓMEZ I, FERNÁNDEZ M T, et al. Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 37(2):279-295.
[26] AVKIRAN N K. Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research[J]. Scientometrics, 1997, 39(2):173-184.
[27] VAN RAAN A F J. The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results[J]. Scientometrics, 1998, 42(3):423-428.
[28] ARUNACHALAM S, DOSS M J. Science in a small country at a time of globalisation:domestic and international collaboration in new biology research in Israel[J]. Journal of information science, 2000, 29(1):39-49.
[29] GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A. Double effort=Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 50(2):199-214.
[30] LEIMU R, KORICHEVA J. Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles?[J]. Bioscience, 2005, 55(5):438-443.
[31] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, Costa F D. Research collaboration and productivity:is there correlation?[J]. Higher education, 2009, 57(2):155-171.
[32] NARIN F, STEVENS K, WHITLOW E S. Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 21(3):313-323.
[33] SUÁREZ-BALSEIRO C, GARCÍA-ZORITA C, SANZ-CASADO E. Multi-authorship and its impact on the visibility of research from Puerto Rico[J]. Information processing and management, 2009, 45(4):469-476.
[34] 贺天伟. 中国国际合作论文的科学计量学研究[J].中国科学基金, 2009, 23(2):93-97.
[35] PUUSKA H M, Muhonen R. International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98:823-839.
[36] BASU A, AGGARWAL R. International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 52(3):379-394.
[37] GOLDFINCH S, DALE T, JR D R. Science from the periphery:collaboration, networks and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand crown research institutes articles, 1995-2000[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 57(3):321-337.
[38] FREDERIKSEN L F. Disciplinary determinants of bibliometric impact in Danish industrial research:Collaboration and visibility[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 61(2):253-270.
[39] PRATHAP G. Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(2):563-570.
[40] CARAYOL N, MATT M. The exploitation of complementarities in scientific production process at the laboratory level[J]. Technovation, 2004, 24(6):455-465.
[41] UDDIN S, HOSSAIN L, ABBASI A, et al. Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 90(2):687-699.
[42] ORTEGA J L. Influence of co-authorship networks in the research impact:Ego network analyses from microsoft academic search[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2014, 8(3):728-737.
[43] 李文聪, 何静, 董纪昌. 网络嵌入视角下国内外合作对科研产出的影响差异——以中国干细胞研究机构为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(1):98-107.
[44] KIM M J. A bibliometric analysis of physics publications in Korea, 1994-1998[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 50(3):503-521.
[45] HE Z L, GENG X S, CAMPBELL-HUNT C. Research collaboration and research output:a longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university[J]. Research policy, 2009, 38(2):306-317.
[46] SOORYAMOORTHY R. Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(1):177.
[47] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, SOLAZZI M. The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3):629-643.
[48] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, SOLAZZI M. Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):204-213.
[49] 邱均平, 曾倩. 国际合作是否能提高科研影响力——以计算机科学为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(10):1-5.
[50] AVKIRAN N K. An empirical investigation of the influence of collaboration in Finance on article impact[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(3):911-925.
[51] 石燕青,孙建军. 我国图书情报领域学者科研绩效与国际合作程度的关系研究[J]. 情报科学,2017,35(11):114-120.
[52] GORRAIZ J, REIMANN R, GUMPENBERGER C. Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration:a case study for Austria and six countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2):417-433.
[53] BORDONS M, APARICIO J, COSTAS R. Heterogeneity of collaboration and its relationship with research impact in a biomedical field[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(2):443-466.
[54] 汪小帆, 李翔, 陈关荣. 网络科学导论[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2012.
[55] 王俊婧. 国际合作对科研论文质量的影响研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2013.
[56] BRAUN T, GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A. Scientometric indicators. A 32-country comparison of publication productivity and citation impact[J]. Journal of chemical research, 1985, 4(1):568-569.
[57] GLÄNZEL W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1):69-115.
[58] GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A and CZERWON H. A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995)[J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 45(2):185-202.
[59] MAY R M. The scientific wealth of nations[J]. Science, 1997, 275(5301):793-796.
[60] INZELT A, SCHUBERT A, SCHUBERT M. Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(1):37-43.
[61] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of America, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[62] 林卉. 机构合作网络与论文合作影响力研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2014.
[63] 朱世琴, 沈汉, 霍丽萍,等. 科研合作对产出论文质量的影响——以华东理工大学为例[J]. 现代情报, 2018(3):164-170.
[64] 郑如青, 张琰. 北京大学科研国际合作的成效与发展对策[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46(5):851-854.
[65] CHEN T J, CHEN Y C, HWANG S J, et al. International collaboration of clinical medicine research in Taiwan, 1990-2004:A bibliometric analysis[J]. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 2007, 70(3):110-116.
[66] GAZNI A,DIDEGAH F. Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact:a case study of Harvard university's publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(2):251-265.
[67] KATO M. The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(3):535-553.
[68] ALDIERI L, KOTSEMIR M N, Vinci C P. The impact of research collaboration on academic performance:an empirical analysis for Russian universities[EB/OL].[2018-03-08]. http://10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003.
[69] ALDIERI L, KOTSEMIR M N, Vinci C P. The impact of research collaboration on academic performance:an empirical analysis for some European countries[J]. Socio-economic planning sciences, 2017, 62:13-30.
[70] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO A C, Murgia G. The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(4):1016-1030.
[71] RONDA-PUPO G A, SYLVAN KATZ J. The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and international collaboration of Cuban articles in natural sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3):1423-1434.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉