图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2019 , Vol. 63 >Issue 16: 84 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.16.009

情报研究

热点论文分布特征与影响因素分析——兼评时间窗口与学科间差异

  • 宋超 ,
  • 陈悦 ,
  • 汪玲 ,
  • 左佳 ,
  • 刘则渊
展开
  • 大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所暨WISE实验室 大连 116024
宋超(ORCID:0000-0002-8668-6888),博士研究生;汪玲(ORCID:0000-0002-5210-7745),硕士研究生;左佳(ORCID:0000-0002-5350-2456),硕士研究生;刘则渊(ORCID:0000-0002-9206-7207),教授,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2018-11-10

  修回日期: 2019-03-08

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-20

基金资助

本文系中国科学院发展规划局咨询课题"2018中国科学院8+2融合科学领域竞争优势国际比较的理论和方法研究"（项目编号：GHJ-ZLZX-2018-32-2）研究成果之一。

收起

Analysis of Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Hot Papers——Comment on the Differences Under Time Window and Interdisciplinary

  • Song Chao ,
  • Chen Yue ,
  • Wang Ling ,
  • Zuo Jia ,
  • Liu Zeyuan
Expand
  • Institute of Science of Science and S & T Management & WISE Lab, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024

Received date: 2018-11-10

  Revised date: 2019-03-08

  Online published: 2019-08-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]近年来，热点论文逐渐受到学术界重视，为数不多的研究成果已开始探索热点论文自身的特征，但在影响因素等规律方面的研究工作尚不充分。[方法/过程]本研究利用TF-IDF算法和负二项回归模型，试图探究热点论文的分布特征、影响因素、时间窗口差异和学科类型差异。[结果/结论]研究结果表明，热点论文的分布特征侧重于发达国家、知名研究机构、交叉学科和权威期刊；并且受到精炼的标题、国家间合作、研究型产出、开放获取、高影响因子期刊等因素影响；热点论文存在时间窗口效应，甚至改变了标题、摘要、开放获取等因素影响热点论文的具体轨迹；学科间差异对热点论文具有影响，在标题、摘要、科研合作、文献类型、开放获取、期刊影响因子方面均存在差异。

关键词： 热点论文; 分布特征; 影响因素; 时间窗口; 学科差异; 负二项回归模型

本文引用格式

宋超 , 陈悦 , 汪玲 , 左佳 , 刘则渊 . 热点论文分布特征与影响因素分析——兼评时间窗口与学科间差异[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(16) : 84 -94 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.16.009

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] In recent years, hot papers have been paid more and more attention by academia. A few research results have begun to explore the characteristics of hot papers themselves, but the research on influencing factors and other laws is still insufficient.[Method/process] Based on this, this study uses TF-IDF algorithm and negative binomial regression model to explore the distribution characteristics, influencing factors, time window differences and disciplines type differences of hot papers.[Result/conclusion] The results show that the distribution characteristics of hot papers focus on developed countries, well-known research institutions, interdisciplinary and authoritative journals, and are influenced by refined titles, inter-country cooperation, research output, open access, high-impact factor journals and other factors; hot papers have time window effect, and even change the titles, abstracts, open access and other factors. The differences among disciplines have an impact on hot papers, and there are differences in title, abstract, scientific research cooperation, literature type, open access and journal impact factors.

Key words： hot papers; distribution characteristics; influencing factors; time window; disciplinary differences; negative binomial regression model

参考文献

[1] GROSS P L, GROSS E M. College libraries and chemical education[J]. Science, 1927, 66(1713):385-389.
[2] VIRGO J A. A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers[J]. Library quarterly, 1977, 47(4):415-430.
[3] MOED H F. The impact-factors debate:the ISI's uses and limits[J]. Nature, 2002, 415(6873):731-732.
[4] BORNMANN L, ANEGÓN F D M, LEYDESDORFF L. Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants? A bibliometric investigation of the Ortega Hypothesis[J]. Plos one, 2010, 5(10):e13327.
[5] BORNMANN L, DANIEL H. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior[J]. Journal of documentation, 2008, 64(1):45-80.
[6] MARX W, BORNMANN L. Change of perspective:bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references:a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2):1397-1415.
[7] PERITZ B C. On the objectives of citation analysis:problems of theory and method[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 1992, 43(6):448-451.
[8] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[9] RAAN A F J V. Sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3):467-472.
[10] DAVIS J B. Problems in using the social sciences citation index to rank economics journals[J]. American economist, 1998, 42(2):59-64.
[11] CLARIVATE. Analyze top research output and research fronts[EB/OL].[2018-08-01].https://clarivate.com/products/essential-science-indicators/.
[12] 宋敏,杜尚宇,刘多,等.国家自然科学基金资助产出热点论文分析——基于2013-2015年ESI数据[J].中国科学基金, 2017, 31(5):489-493.
[13] THOR A, BORNMANN L, MARX W, et al. Identifying single influential publications in a research field:new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1):591-608.
[14] EOM Y H, FORTUNATO S. Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics[J]. Plos one, 2011, 6(9):e24926.
[15] WANG D, BARABÁSI A L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6154):127-132.
[16] ZHENG X, OUYANG Z, ZHANG P, et al. Modeling the citation network by network cosmology[J]. Plos one, 2015, 10(3):e0120687.
[17] 王侠,吕传禄,孙晓希.基于ESI的国际药理毒理学研究领域热点论文产出状况的分析[J].药学实践杂志, 2016, 34(5):437-440.
[18] WANG J. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3):851-872.
[19] SCHOLES G D, KAMAT P V. Hot papers in physical chemistry[J]. The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2016, 7(2):339-340.
[20] BORNMANN L, YE A Y, YE F Y. Identifying "hot papers" and papers with "delayed recognition" in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(2):655-674.
[21] 孙学军.SCI新增功能"文献级别用量指标"是个什么东东?[EB/OL].[2018-08-01].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-926981.html.
[22] LETCHFORD A, MOAT H S, PREIS T. The advantage of short paper titles[J]. Royal society open science, 2015, 2(8):150266.
[23] HABIBZADEH F, YADOLLAHIE M. Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? cross-sectional study of 22 scientific journals[J]. Croatian medical journal, 2010, 51(2):165-170.
[24] JACQUES T S, SEBIRE N J. The impact of article titles on citation hits:an analysis of general and specialist medical journals[J]. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine short reports, 2010, 1(1):1-5.
[25] NAIR L B, GIBBERT M. What makes a ‘good’ title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3):1331-1359.
[26] PAIVA C E, PAIVA B S R. Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often[J]. Clinics, 2012, 67(5):509-513.
[27] SUBOTIC S, MUKHERJEE B. Short and amusing:the relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles[J]. Journal of information science, 2014, 40(1):115-124.
[28] GNEWUCH M, WOHLRABE K. Title characteristics and citations in economics[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 110(3):1-6.
[29] DIDEGAH F, THELWALL M. Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? collaboration, journal and document properties[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(4):861-873.
[30] 徐庆富,康旭东,张春博.多期刊比较视角下的论文被引频次若干影响因素研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37(2):147-153.
[31] LETCHFORD A, PREIS T, MOAT H S. The advantage of simple paper abstracts[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 10(1):1-8.
[32] 邱均平,曾倩.国际合作是否能提高科研影响力——以计算机科学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):1-5.
[33] BEAVER D D. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study):past, present, and future[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 52(3):365-377.
[34] FIGG W D, DUNN L, LIEWEHR D J, et al. Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles[J]. Pharmacotherapy the journal of human pharmacology & drug therapy, 2006, 26(6):759-767.
[35] GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A. Double effort=double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 50(2):199-214.
[36] GLÄNZEL W. Seven myths in bibliometrics about facts and fiction in quantitative science studies[J]. Collnet journal of scientometrics & information management, 2008, 2(1):9-17.
[37] 钟镇.农业经济与政策Web of Science期刊论文合著规模与绩效的相关性分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(12):1513-1518.
[38] BORNMANN L, SCHIER H, MARX W, et al. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(1):11-18.
[39] WEBSTER G D, JONASON P K, SCHEMBER T O. Hot topics and popular papers in evolutionary psychology:analyses of title works and citation counts in evolution and human behavior, 1979-2008[J]. Evolutionary psychology, 2009, 7(3):348-362.
[40] VANCLAY J K. Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(2):265-271.
[41] 付中静.国际权威期刊非可被引文献的引证特征以及对影响因子的贡献[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(3):324-329.
[42] KULKARNI A V, BUSSE J W, SHAMS I. Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature[J]. Plos one, 2007, 2(5):e403.
[43] ROBSON B J, MOUSQUES A. Can we predict citation counts of environmental modelling papers? Fourteen bibliographic and categorical variables predict less than 30% of the variability in citation counts[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2016, 75(1):94-104.
[44] HASLAM N, KOVAL P. Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology[J]. Psychol rep, 2010, 106(3):891-900.
[45] SCHLOEGL C, GORRAIZ J. Comparison of citation and usage indicators:the case of oncology journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3):567-580.
[46] 付中静.不同引证时间窗口论文量引关系实证研究——基于论文与期刊视角[J].情报杂志, 2017, 36(7):128-133.
[47] DIDEGAH F, THELWALL M. Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64(5):1055-1064.
[48] FINARDI U. Correlation between journal impact factor and citation performance:an experimental study[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(2):357-370.
[49] SEGLEN P O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research[J]. British medical journal, 1997, 314(7079):498-502.
[50] WANG X, LIU C, MAO W, et al. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2):555-564.
[51] VIEIRA E S, GOMES J A N F. Citations to scientific articles:its distribution and dependence on the article features[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(1):1-13.
[52] MARTÍNEZ M A, HERRERA M, CONTRERAS E, et al. Characterizing highly cited papers in social work through H-classics[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2):1713-1729.
[53] JAHANDIDEH S, ABDOLMALEKI P, ASADABADI E B. Prediction of future citations of a research paper from number of its internet downloads[J]. Medical hypotheses, 2007, 69(2):458-459.
[54] 丁佐奇.基于Web of Science的论文使用次数和被引频次的相关性分析[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2017, 28(12):1166-1170.
[55] MOED H F, HALEVI G. On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(2):412-431.
[56] BRODY T, HARNAD S, CARR L. Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2006, 57(8):1060-1072.
[57] GUERRERO-BOTE V P, MOYA-ANEGÓN F. Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2):1043-1065.
[58] LIPPI G, FAVALORO E J. Article downloads and citations:is there any relationship?[J]. Clinica chimica acta, 2013, 415(1):195.
[59] WANG X, FANG Z, SUN X. Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science:a study on Web of Science usage count[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2):917-926.
[60] 盛丽娜. Scopus数据库眼科学期刊热点论文分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志, 2014, 23(2):60-62,67.
[61] 匡登辉. 从Altmetrics热点论文看科技期刊影响力——以Altmetric.com top 100论文为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(11):1188-1194.
[62] 刘则渊,陈悦,侯海燕. 技术科学前沿图谱与强国战略[M].北京:人民出版社, 2012.
[63] 谢锋昌,韦博成,林金官.零过多数据的统计分析及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2013.
[64] CHETTY R, FRIEDMAN J N, LETH-PETERSEN S, et al. Active vs. Passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts:evidence from denmark[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 2014, 129(3):1141-1219.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉