情报研究

基于作者贡献声明的合著者贡献率测度方法

  • 丁敬达 ,
  • 王新明
展开
  • 1. 上海大学图书情报档案系 上海 200444;
    2. 齐鲁工业大学(山东省科学院) 济南 250353;
    3. 山东省计算中心(国家超级计算济南中心) 济南 250101
丁敬达(ORCID:0000-0002-4075-8604),教授,博士,博士生导师,E-mail:djdhyn@126.com;王新明(ORCID:0000-0002-9741-4853),助理研究员,硕士。

收稿日期: 2018-12-05

  修回日期: 2019-03-14

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目"数字科研环境下学术信息交流系统的变化规律与模型重构研究"(编号:17BTQ071)研究成果之一。

The Measurement Method of Coauthor Contribution Rate Based on the Author's Contribution Statement

  • Ding Jingda ,
  • Wang Xinming
Expand
  • 1. Department of Library, Information and Archives, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444;
    2. Qilu University of Technology(Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353;
    3. Shandong Computer Science Center(National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Jinan 250101

Received date: 2018-12-05

  Revised date: 2019-03-14

  Online published: 2019-08-20

摘要

[目的/意义]在科学研究问题越来越复杂、科研合著越来越盛行的大科学时代,迫切需要对论文合著作者进行学术贡献评估和分配,以减少科研人员之间的摩擦,促进科研合作。[方法/过程]分析作者贡献声明的研究和实践现状以及目前合著者贡献率测度方法的功能和不足,结合作者贡献要素声明和作者对不同贡献要素的参与程度,提出并构建一种具有定性性质的合著者贡献率定量测度方法。[结果/结论]该方法不仅改进了既有合著者贡献率测度方法的相关缺陷,而且将文献计量由单篇论文单元深入推进至论文作者的贡献要素单元,提升了文献计量评估指标的精度和效度。案例分析表明,该方法能较客观地反映作者的贡献程度和学术能力状况,具有一定的先进性和适用性。

本文引用格式

丁敬达 , 王新明 . 基于作者贡献声明的合著者贡献率测度方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(16) : 95 -102 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.16.010

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] With the quickly development of science and technology and the coming of the era of big science, there are more and more scientific research cooperation and co-authored research papers, which is urgent to evaluate and distribute the contribution of coauthor in order to reduce the friction between researchers and promote scientific research.[Method/process] By systematically reviewing the relevant research literatures and surveying the practice of the famous academic journals, this article illustrated the development process of the author's contribution statement and analyzes the relationship between key elements of author's contribution and the order of authorship as well as the function and shortcoming of author contribution computation solutions existed. Based on the author's contribution statement and the degree of author's participation in each contributing element, this paper constructed the new measurement method of coauthor contribution rate.[Result/conclusion] The new method can improve the traditional measurement method of coauthor contribution rate and promote the academic influence evaluation from the unit of a fully paper to the contribution element of each author in a co-authored research paper.

参考文献

[1] KENNEDY D. Multiple authors, multiple problems[J]. Science, 2003, 301(5634):733.
[2] WALTMAN L. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(4):700-711.
[3] Corrêa JR E A, SILVA F N, COSTA L F, et al. Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(2):498-510.
[4] 丁敬达.人文社会科学网络学术信息资源评价理论与方法研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2017.
[5] ICMJE. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals[EB/OL].[2018-08-13]. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家版权局.《中华人民共和国著作权法》[EB/OL].[2018-09-16]. http://www.ncac.gov.cn/chinacopyright/contents/479.
[7] HWANG S S, SONG H H, BAIK J H, et al. Researcher contributions and fulfillment of icmje authorship criteria:analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology[J]. Radiology, 2003, 226(1):16-23.
[8] LARIVIōRE V, DESROCHERS N, MACALUSO B, et al. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production[J]. Social studies of science, 2016, 46(3):417-435.
[9] ALLEN L, SCOTT J, BRAND A, et al. Publishing:credit where credit is due[J]. Nature, 2014, 508(7496):312-313.
[10] FRISCHE S. It is time for full disclosure of author contributions[J]. Nature, 2012, 489(7417):475.
[11] BAERLOCHER M O, NEWTON M, GAUTAM T, et al. The meaning of author order in medical research[J]. Journal of investigative medicine, 2007, 55(4):174-180.
[12] YANG S, WOLFRAM D, WANG F. The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists:a comparison of three general medical journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,110(3):1129-1273.
[13] 崔林蔚,陆颖. 基于作者署名排序的作者贡献要素分析——以《图书情报工作》2015-2016年作者贡献声明为例[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(9):80-86.
[14] 丁敬达,王新明.作者贡献声明及与作者署名之间的关系——基于3种图情学期刊的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(24):63-70.
[15] CASRAI. CRediT[EB/OL].[2018-09-13]. http://docs.casrai.org/CRediT.
[16] MCNUTT M K, BRADFORD M, DRAZEN J M, et al. Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(11):2557-2560.
[17] BERG J. Transparent author credit[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6379):961.
[18] PLOS. Author contributions[EB/OL].[2018-09-20]. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/authorship.
[19] RAO R I K, SAHOO B. Distributions of multiple authors:a case study of two journals (JASIST and Scientometrics)[J]. Collnet journal of icientometrics and information management, 2008, 2(1):27-35.
[20] HU X, ROUSSEAU R, CHEN J. In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices[J]. Journal of information science, 2010, 36(1):73-85.
[21] LINDSEY D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science:the problem of multiple authorship[J]. Social studies of science, 1980, 10(2):145-162.
[22] ABE O, ABE R, ENOMOTO K. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival:an overview of the randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472):1687-1717.
[23] PRICE D D. Multiple authorship[J]. Science, 1981, 212(4498):986.
[24] HAGEN N T. Harmonic publication and citation counting:sharing authorship credit equitably-not equally, geometrically or arithmetically[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(3):785-793.
[25] 樊向伟,肖仙桃.论文合著者贡献分配算法研究进展及比较分析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(10):116-123.
[26] EGGHE L, ROUSSEAU R, HOOYDONK G V. Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries:consequences for evaluation studies[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2000, 51(2):145-157.
[27] ABBAS A M. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1):107-131.
[28] VERHAGEN J V, WALLACE K J, COLLINS S C, et al. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors[J]. Nature, 2003, 426(6967):602.
[29] TSCHARNTKE T, HOCHBERG M E, RAND T A, et al. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications[J]. PLOS biology, 2007, 5(1):13-14.
[30] RAHMAN M T, REGENSTEIN J M, KASSIM N L A, et al. The need to quantify authors' relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(1):275-281.
[31] 徐晨.多场景下单个科研成果合著贡献度研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):93-99.
[32] KOSMULSKI M. The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(4):639-644.
[33] SEKERCIOGLU C H. Quantifying coauthor contributions[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5900):371.
文章导航

/