理论研究

用户搜寻意图和搜寻策略选择的关联机制

  • 袁红
展开
  • 南通大学经济与管理学院 南通 226019
袁红(ORCID:0000-0003-2865-640X),教授,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:yh@ntu.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2019-01-22

  修回日期: 2019-08-31

  网络出版日期: 2019-11-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目"用户探索式搜索行为的意图-策略关联模式研究"(项目编号:17BTQ087)研究成果之一。

Research on the Correlation Mechanism Between Users' Seeking Intention and Seeking Strategy Selection

  • Yuan Hong
Expand
  • School of Economics and Management, Nantong University, Nantong 226019

Received date: 2019-01-22

  Revised date: 2019-08-31

  Online published: 2019-11-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 搜寻意图是信息搜寻过程的起点,搜寻策略是搜寻行为的规划,两者的关联机制是搜寻行为动态发展规律的集中体现,研究搜寻意图和搜寻策略选择的关联机制有利于深入了解搜寻行为产生及变化的原因和过程。[方法/过程] 通过问卷收集搜寻意图与搜寻策略数据,使用UCINET研究不同意图下的策略选择偏好,使用SPSS modeler探寻不同意图下的策略组合,采用ROST CM对基于不同意图的信息偶遇现象进行研究。[结果/结论] 搜索和浏览是用户信息搜寻时最常使用的搜寻策略;不同的搜寻意图对应的用户搜寻策略选择偏好呈现明显差异,也表现出不同的搜寻策略组合模式;信息偶遇比较大概率地发生在信息查找、资源下载和建议咨询情境中。

本文引用格式

袁红 . 用户搜寻意图和搜寻策略选择的关联机制[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(22) : 49 -57 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.22.006

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Seeking intention is the starting point of search process, seeking strategy is the planning of search behavior, and the correlation mechanism between seeking intention and seeking strategy selection is the reorientation of the dynamic development of search behavior. It is of great significance of exploring the correlation mechanism between information seeking intention and seeking strategy selection to deeply understand the causes and processes of the changing search behavior.[Method/process] This paper collected the data of seeking intention and seeking strategy through questionnaires, used UCINET to study the preference of strategy choice, used SPSS modeler to explore the most commonly used strategy combinations, and used ROST CM to study information encounter under different intentions.[Result/conclusion] Searching and browsing are the two most frequently used seeking strategies. Users have obvious differences in their preferences for different seeking strategies and different seeking strategy combinations corresponding to different seeking intentions. For the strategy of information encountering, it is more likely to occur in the situation of information searching, resource downloading, and advising and consulting.

参考文献

[1] BRODER A. A taxonomy of Web search[J]. ACM SIGIR forum, 2002, 36(2):3-10.
[2] NGUYEN V B, KAN M Y. Functional faceted Web query analysis[C]//WWW 2007. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. New York:ACM, 2007:32-39.
[3] BELKIN N J, KELLY D, KIM G. Query length in interactive information Retrieval[C]//Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2003:205-212.
[4] VALLET D, ZARAGOZA H. Inferring the most important types of a query:a semantic approach[C]//Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2008:857-858.
[5] 张晓娟. 信息类、导航类与事务类查询的网络动态性分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2017, 1(4):13-23.
[6] BATES M J. Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching[J]. New review of information behavior research, 2002(3):1-15.
[7] XIE H. Patterns between interactive intentions and information-seeking strategies[J]. Information processing & management, 2002, 38(1):55-77.
[8] 袁红. 社会化媒体环境下用户信息浏览策略的效率评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(4):89-94.
[9] 田梅, 朱学芳. 基于现行信息素养模型的大学生信息偶遇能力培养[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(17):41-46.
[10] YUE Z, HAN S, JIANG J, et al. Search tactics as means of examining search processes in collaborative exploratory Web search[C]//Proceedings of the 5th Ph.D. workshop on information and knowledge ACM. New York:ACM, 2012:59-66.
[11] JOO S, XIE I. How do users' search tactic selections influence search outputs in exploratory search tasks?[C]//Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. New York:ACM, 2013:397-398.
[12] LAZONDER A W, BIEMANS H J A, WOPEREIS I G J H. Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000,51(6):576-581.
[13] 王知津, 韩正彪, 周鹏.电子商务网站顾客信息搜寻行为形成机制研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2011(3):12-16.
[14] 王广新, 谭金波. 学生网络信息搜索策略选择的差异分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2014(5):56-61.
[15] 袁红, 王奥. 采莓与搜索:随性休闲搜索行为特征研究[J]. 现代情报, 2019(4):59-68.
[16] ROSE D E, LEVINSON D. Understanding user goals in Web search[C]//WWW 2004:Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. New York:ACM, 2004:13-19.
[17] 齐富民,谢晓尧,吴静.网络搜索中用户搜寻意图识别的研究[J].计算机工程与设计, 2014, 35(4):1285-1292.
[18] 唐静笑, 吕学强, 柳成洋,等.用户查询意图的层次化识别方法[J].现代图书情报技术, 2014(1):36-42.
[19] KRIKEIAS J. Information-seeking behavior:patterns and concepts[J]. Drexel library quarterly, 1983, 19(2):5-20.
[20] 姜婷婷, 杨佳琪, 李倩. 信息行为领域概念空间构建与研究进展述评[J]. 图书情报知识, 2019(1):99-108.
[21] 张红艳, 都娟. 关联规则中Apriori算法的应用[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2011(8):14-15.
[22] ERDELEZ S. Information encountering:it's more than just bumping into information[J]. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1999, 25(3):26-29.
[23] MCCAY-PEET L, TOMS E G. Investigating serendipity:how it unfolds and what may influence it[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66(7):1463-1476.
[24] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第44次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R/OL].[2019-08-30]. http://cnnic.net/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201908/P020190830356787490958.pdf.
文章导航

/