[目的/意义] 对科学研究成果与专利技术创新之间知识扩散和交叉融合发展态势的剖析，是学科领域布局、研发投入及科技资源配置等工作的重要决策依据。现有研究的测度指标未能详尽反映科技关联关系的特征及演变规律，通过设计新的指标，提出聚焦演变态势分析的领域科技关联关系测度指标及方法。[方法/过程] 通过对现有测度指标进行分析归纳，将单一的科学关联度和/或关联时滞指标扩展为紧密性、时效性、多样性三个方面分层次的测量指标，从而较全面地揭示和发现科技关联的程度及特征规律。[结果/结论] 利用本文构建的测度指标对HCV研究领域进行了计算和讨论，揭示出了该领域科技关联发展态势，并体现了新指标在测度维度系统性上的优势以及其结论对专利技术研发活动的参考价值。
[Purpose/significance] The analysis of the knowledge diffusion and cross-integration development between scientific research results and patent technology innovation is an important decision-making basis for subject and field layout, R&D investment and technology resource allocation. The metrics of the existing research fail to reflect in detail the characteristics and evolution of the relationship between science and technology, this paper try to design some new indicators, and propose a method for measuring and analyzing the scientific and technological relationship in a specific field that focuses on the analysis of the evolutionary situation.[Method/process] By analyzing and summarizing the existing metrics, we expanded the metric of a single indicator such as Science Linkage and/or time lag to the hierarchic almetric that from three aspects:compactness, timeliness and diversity. So that, we can fully reveal and discover the degree and characteristics of science-technology relationship.[Result/conclusion] The empirical analysis of HCV research field revealed its development trend of science-technology relationship and verified the systematicness advantage of the new index and the reference value of its conclusion to the patent technology research and development activities.
[1] 刘则渊,陈悦. 新巴斯德象限:高科技政策的新范式[J].管理学报,2007,4(3):346-353.
[2] 刘小玲,谭宗颖,张超星. 国内外"科学-技术关系"研究方法述评——聚焦文献计量方法[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(13):142-148.
[3] PRICE D J DE SOLLA. Is technology historically independent of science? a study in statistical historiography[J].Technology and culture, 1965,6(4):553-568.
[4] VERBEEK A, DEBACKERE K, LUWEL M. Science cited in patents:ageographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2):241-263.
[5] GARFIELD E. Patent citation indexing and the notions of novelty,similarity and relevance[J]. Essays of an information scientist, 1984, 7(3):536-542.
[6] NARIN F, HAMILTON K S, OLIVASTRO D. The increasing linkage between US technology and science[J]. Research policy, 1997, 26(3):317-330.
[7] MEYER M.Does science push technology? patents citing scientific literature[J]. Research policy,2000,29(3):409-434.
[8] BHATTACHARYA S,MEYER M.Large firms and the science-technology interface patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films[J]. Scientometrics,2003,58(2):265-279.
[9] CHOUNG J Y, MIN H G, PARK M C.Patterns of knowledge production:the case of information and telecommunication sector in Korea[J]. Scientometrics,2003,58(1):115-128.
[10] ZHAO Q J, GUAN J C.Modeling the dynamic relation between science and technology in nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics,2012,90(2):561-579.
[11] VAN LOOY B.Do science & technology interactions pay off when developing technology? an exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains[J]. Scientometrics,2003,58(3):355-367.
[12] BUSH V. Science and the endless frontier[M].USA:National Science Foundation, 1945.
[13] CARPENTER MP, NARIN F. Validation study:patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence[J].World patent information,1983, 5(3):180-185.
[14] NARIN F, NOMA E. Is technology becoming science?[J]. Scientometrics, 1985,7(3/6):369-381.
[15] SCHMOCH U. Indicators and the relations between science and technology[J].Scientometrics, 1997,38(1):103-116.
[16] VERBEEK A, DEBACKERE K, LUWEL M, et, al. Linking science to technology:using bibliographic references in patents to build linkages chemes[J]. Scientometrics,2002,54(3):399-420.
[17] 赵志耘,雷孝平. 我国生物科技领域技术创新与基础研究关联分析:从专利引文分析的角度[J]. 情报学报,2012,31(12):1283-1289.
[18] HENDERSON R, JAFFE A, TRAJTENBERG M. Patent citations and geography of knowledge spillovers:a reassessment:comment[J].American economic review, 2005,95(1):461-464.
[19] BACCHIOCCHI E, MONTOBBIO F. Knowledge diffusion from university and public research:a comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations[J].Journal of technology transfer,2009(34):169-181.
[20] HIROYUKI T, TAKAYUKI T, YASUHIRO Y, et al. A bibiiometric anaiysis of scientific literatures cited by influential patents[J].Journal of information processing and management, 2006(1):2-10.
[21] LO S C S. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development:a case of genetic engineering research[J].Scientometrics, 2010(1):109-120.
[22] 日本文部科学省. Annual report on the promotion of science and technology 2001[R].东京:文部科学省,2002.
[23] 赵志耘,雷孝平. 我国生物科技领域技术创新与基础研究关联分析:从专利引文分析的角度[J]. 情报学报,2012,31(12):1283-1289.
[24] 裴云龙,蔡虹,赵皎卉.纳米科学对纳米技术的影响基于NPR的分析[J].情报杂志2010,29(10):1-4.
[25] 文晓芬.基于专利引文的我国基础研究与技术创新的关联分析[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所, 2011.
[26] 张玲玲,李睿,李婧.在期刊-专利引用网中发现支撑技术创新的基础知识——以D01F技术领域为例[J].情报理论与实践,2014,37(5):64-68.
[27] 李春燕,石荣.专利质量指标评价探索[J].现代情报,2008,28(2):146-149.
[28] 殷媛媛.基于论文专利引证关系的科学技术互动研究——以立体显示为实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012,56(16):65-70.
[29] DANNY J E, DELPHI G M C,TARA L P, et al.丙型肝炎药物的可及性[EB/OL].[2018-07-10].https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/11/15-157784-ab/zh/.
[30] 刘炜炜.中国2007-2014年丙型病毒性肝炎新发感染情况估算[D].北京:中国疾控中心流病办,2016.
[31] 崔妹娟,王晓春.丙型肝炎流行状况及危险因素的研究进展[J].中国艾滋病性病,2014,20(2):141-144.
[32] 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,中国科学院文献情报中心,Clarivate Analytics. 2016研究前沿[R/OL].[2018-07-10]. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com.cn/media/2016researchfront.pdf.
[33] Cambia, Queensland University of Technology. lens[D/OL].[2018-07-20].https://www.lens.org.
