综述述评

近十年国内外图书馆资源发现系统研究与实践进展述评

  • 李慧芳 ,
  • 孟祥保
展开
  • 东南大学图书馆 南京 211189
李慧芳(ORCID:0000-0001-6861-6782),馆员,硕士,E-mail:hfl@seu.edu.cn;孟祥保(ORCID:0000-0002-8635-1973),副研究馆员,硕士。

收稿日期: 2019-06-19

  修回日期: 2019-09-16

  网络出版日期: 2020-03-20

基金资助

本文系江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目"基于资源发现系统的高校图书馆用户行为模式挖掘与服务优化研究"(项目编号:2017SJB0021)和教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基于学术交流的高校图书馆科研服务模式与保障研究"(项目编号:15YJC870017)研究成果之一。

A Review of Research and Practice of Library Resource Discovery System in Domestic and Foreign: 2010-2019

  • Li Huifang ,
  • Meng Xiangbao
Expand
  • Southeast University Library, Nanjing 211189

Received date: 2019-06-19

  Revised date: 2019-09-16

  Online published: 2020-03-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 回顾和梳理图书馆资源发现系统的发展历程及研究进展,促进资源发现系统与图书馆业务发展深度融合与创新。[方法/过程] 通过检索中国知网数据库、Web of Science、Emerald、Elsevier、Taylor&Francis SSH等数据库,运用内容分析和案例研究方法,总结图书馆资源发现系统理论研究、选型研究、部署实施、宣传推广、成效评价以及影响研究。[结果/结论] 研究发现:资源发现系统在图书馆得到了快速应用,资源发现系统研究具有明显的周期性和阶段性,国内外资源发现系统发展演进具有差异性,研究内容以实践工作为主而理论深度不足,研究方法以案例研究、问卷调查方法为主,定量研究方法偏少。提出图书馆资源发现系统研究应与图书馆服务深度融合,拓展研究范围和加强研究深度,加强资源发现系统用户画像研究。

本文引用格式

李慧芳 , 孟祥保 . 近十年国内外图书馆资源发现系统研究与实践进展述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(6) : 120 -129 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.06.014

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Reviewing and combing the development process and research status of library resource discovery system has important theoretical and practical significance for promoting deep integration and innovation of resource discovery system and library development.[Method/process] Based on China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Web of Science, Emerald Insight, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis SSH and other academic databases, the paper summarized the theoretical research, system selection, deployment implementation, service promotion, effectiveness evaluation and impact research of library resource discovery system by content analysis and case study.[Result/conclusion] The research results demonstrate that the resource discovery system is applied rapidly in the library. The research process of resource discovery system has obvious periodicity and stage. There are differences in the evolution of resource discovery systems at home and abroad. The research content is practical and the theoretical depth is insufficient. Research methods are mainly case studies and questionnaires, and quantitative research methods are few. Therefore, library resource discovery system should be deeply integrated with the library service, expand the scope of research and strengthen the research depth, and strengthen the research on the user profile of the resource discovery system.

参考文献

[1] 姜爱蓉.数字资源整合系统的技术发展与应用趋势[J].图书馆杂志,2006,25(12):14-18.
[2] BREEDING M. Plotting a new course for metasearch[EB/OL].[2019-02-12]. https://librarytechnology.org/repository/item.pl?id=11341.
[3] BELLISTON C J, HOWLAND J L, ROBERTS B C. Undergraduate use of federated searching:a survey of preferences and perceptions of value-added functionality[EB/OL].[2019-03-24]. http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/608.
[4] DURANTE K, WANG Z. Creating an actionable assessment framework for discovery services in academic libraries[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2012,19(2/4):215-228.
[5] CASSIDY E D, JONES G, MCMAIN L, et al. Student searching with EBSCO discovery:a usability study[J]. Journal of electronic resources librarianship,2014,26(1):17-35.
[6] 殷红,刘炜.新一代图书馆服务系统:功能评价与愿景展望[J].中国图书馆学报,2013,39(5):26-33.
[7] ROSE-WILES L M, HOFMANN M A. Still desperately seeking citations:undergraduate research in the age of Web-scale discovery[J]. Journal of library administration,2013,53(2/3):147-166.
[8] 聂华,朱玲.网络级发现服务——通向深度整合与便捷获取的路径[J].大学图书馆学报,2011,29(6):5-10.
[9] ROWE R. Web-scale discovery:a review of Summon, EBSCO discovery service, and worldcat local[J]. Charleston advisor,2010,12(1):5-10.
[10] CHICKERING F W, YANG S Q. Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools:an update[J]. Information technology & libraries,2014,33(2):5-30.
[11] BREEDING M. The future of library resource discovery:a white paper commissioned by the NISO discovery to delivery (D2D) topic committee[R/OL].[2019-01-07]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.675.3000&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[12] CALHOUN K, CANTRELL J, GALLAGHER P, et al. Online catalogs what users and librarians want[R/OL].[2019-03-26]. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf.
[13] DOLSKI A A. Information discovery insights gained from multipac, a prototype library discovery system[J]. Information technology and libraries,2009,28(4):172-180.
[14] SPEZI V, CREASER C, O'BRIEN A. Impact of library discovery technologies:a report for UKSG[R/OL].[2019-03-26]. https://www.uksg.org/sites/uksg.org/files/UKSG_final_report_16_12_13_by_LISU.pdf.
[15] 洪坚.网络级资源发现系统与图书馆信息服务——基于超星中文发现系统的思考[J].图书馆工作与研究, 2014,1(6):42-45.
[16] 卢章平,袁润,王正兴.发现服务:大学与研究机构图书馆的趋势[J].中国图书馆学报,2014(3):20-26.
[17] 李文林,曾莉,杨斓.基于文献的知识发现服务及其问题——以南京中医药大学图书馆为例[J].大学图书馆学报,2015,33(2):61-65.
[18] 郑丽君.资源发现服务:图书馆服务与研究的新视角[J].图书与情报,2013(3):132-134.
[19] YANG S Q, WAGNER K. Evaluating and comparing discovery tools:how close are we towards next generation catalog?[J]. Library hi tech,2010,28(4):690-709.
[20] 秦鸿,钱国富,钟远薪.三种发现服务系统的比较研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2012(5):5-11.
[21] HOEPPNER A. The ins and outs of evaluating Web-scale discovery services[J]. Computers in libraries, 2012, 32(3):6-40.
[22] HOSETH A. Criteria to consider when evaluating Web-based discovery tools[EB/OL].[2019-02-11]. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch006.
[23] 刘万国,孙波,黄颖.网络级发现服务平台比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(4):111-113.
[24] DEODATO J. Evaluating Web-scale discovery:a step-by-step guide[J]. Information technology & libraries,2015,34(2):19-75.
[25] MILBERG C I. A tale of two systems:a case study on the implementation of two discovery systems at Davidson College[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2012,19(2/4):264-277.
[26] AYMONIN D, BOREL A, GROLIMUND R, et al. Be realistic, demand the impossible:comparison of 4 discovery tools using real data at the EPFL Library[R/OL].[2019-03-02]. https://zenodo.org/record/7028#.XQdMNfkzaUk.
[27] YEO P P. Impact of a new discovery service at Li Ka Shing Library[J]. Singapore journal of library & information management, 2012,41:36-50.
[28] 李云华,刘颖,刘伟成.学术资源发现系统选型研究[J].新世纪图书馆,2015(12):22-25.
[29] 廖静.山东大学图书馆资源发现系统评估工作的摸索与实践[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(9):52-57.
[30] 孙宇,张磊,刘炜.图书馆资源发现系统选型研究[J].图书馆杂志,2013,32(12):63-70.
[31] 姜莹莹,李睿华.图书馆发现服务平台的评估工作与研究[J].大学图书情报学刊,2015,33(3):86-91.
[32] 殷沈琴,唐武京,邵诚敏,等.三家资源发现系统的调研、测试和评估[J].图书馆杂志,2013,32(12):82-86.
[33] STONE G. Searching life, the universe and everything? the implementation of Summon at the University of Huddersfield[J]. LIBER quarterly,2010,20(1):25-51.
[34] MAHONEY J, LEACH-MURRAY S. Implementation of a discovery layer:the Franklin College experience[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2012,19(2/4):327-343.
[35] WROSCH J, ROGERS-COLLINS K, BARNES M, et al. Search me:Eastern Michigan University's journey through the highs and lows of implementing the Summon discovery tool[J]. College & undergraduate libraries, 2012, 19(2/4):367-386.
[36] 朱玲,崔海媛,聂华.网络级发现服务的实施:实践与思考——以北大图书馆"未名学术搜索"为例[J].大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(4):91-97.
[37] 窦天芳,姜爱蓉,周虹,等.清华大学学术资源发现平台的建设及思考——以"水木搜索"为例[J].图书馆杂志,2013,32(12):71-75.
[38] MORTIMORE J M, DUNN M G, MCNAUGHTON D A, et al. Smoke gets in your eyes:trials and triumphs of implementing the Ex Libris Primo discovery service in a small regional consortium[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2012,19(2/4):344-366.
[39] WALKER S, SIMS I L. Implementing a discovery tool at two HBCUs[J]. College & undergraduate libraries, 2012, 19(2):312-326.
[40] 孙翌,郭晶.上海交大图书馆资源发现与获取平台建设[J].图书馆杂志,2013,32(6):70-75.
[41] PINKAS, MAR? A M, BAGLIVO M D, KLEIN I R, et al. Selecting and implementing a discovery tool:the University of Maryland health sciences and human services library experience[J]. Journal of electronic resources in medical libraries,2014,11(1):1-12.
[42] BACON V, BOYER G. Beyond discovery tools:the evolution of discovery at ECU libraries[EB/OL].[2019-04-06]. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4279.
[43] WILLIAMS H, PETERS A. And that's how I connect to my library:how a 42-second promotional video helped to launch the UTSA libraries' new summon mobile application[J]. The reference librarian, 2012, 53(3):322-325.
[44] 周义刚,聂华,廖三三.北京大学资源发现服务推广探析——以未名学术搜索为例[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(20):67-72.
[45] EVELHOCH Z. Web-scale discovery:impact on library database Web page views and usage[J]. Journal of Web librarianship,2016,10(3):197-209.
[46] 朱玲,聂华.通过日志挖掘研究图书馆资源发现服务用户的搜索行为[J].现代图书情报技术,2011(12):74-78.
[47] COHEN R A, THORPE A. Discovering user behavior:applying usage statistics to shape frontline services[J]. The serials librarian,2015,69(1):29-46.
[48] 杨丽萍,王俊,韦晓莹.资源发现系统的用户信息行为分析——以西交利物浦大学图书馆为例[J].图书馆研究,2019,(2):92-99.
[49] WAY D. The impact of Web-scale discovery on the use of a library collection[J]. Serials review, 2010,36(4):214-220.
[50] 高冉,郭丽然,毛芸.发现系统对期刊数据库使用量的影响分析——基于北京师范大学使用Primo发现系统前后4年的数据库统计[J].高校图书馆工作,2018,38(2):42-44.
[51] O'HARA L. Collection usage pre- and post-Summon implementation at the University of Manitoba[J]. Evidence based library & information practice,2012,7(4):25-34.
[52] COMEAUX D J. Usability testing of a Web-scale discovery system at an academic library[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2012,19(2/4):189-206.
[53] MEIROSE J, LIAN B. User testing:gathering data from first-year medical students as they interact with the EBSCO discovery service (EDS)[J]. Journal of electronic resources in medical libraries, 2019:16(1):1-7.
[54] CLARK A R, ERDMANN A, FERGUSON J, et al. Taking action on usability testing findings:Simmons College Library case study[J]. The serials librarian, 2016, 71(3/4):186-196.
[55] FOSTER A K, MACDONALD J B. A tale of two discoveries:comparing the usability of Summon and EBSCO discovery service[J]. Journal of Web librarianship, 2013, 7(1):1-19.
[56] DJENNO M, INSUA G, GREGORY G M. Discovering usability:comparing two discovery systems at one academic library[J]. Journal of Web librarianship,2014,8(3):263-285.
[57] 杨桦,袁润,王正兴,等.高校图书馆资源发现系统用户功能需求与差异性量化研究[J].现代情报,2018,38(6):111-116.
[58] BULL S, CRAFT E, DODDS A. Evaluation of a resource discovery service:FindIt@Bham[J]. New review of academic librarianship,2014,20(2):137-166.
[59] FOSTER A K. Determining librarian research preferences:a comparison survey of Web-scale discovery systems and subject databases[J]. Journal of academic librarianship,2018,44(3):330-336.
[60] LUNDRIGAN C, MANUEL K, YAN M. "Pretty Rad":explorations in user satisfaction with a discovery layer at Ryerson University[J]. College & research libraries,2015,76(1):43-62.
[61] NICHOLS A, BILLEY A, SPITZFORM P, et al. Kicking the tires:a usability study of the Primo discovery tool[J]. Journal of Web librarianship, 2014, 8(2):172-195.
[62] LEE B, CHUNG E K. An analysis of Web-scale discovery services from the perspective of user's relevance judgment[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2016, 42(5):529-534.
[63] 杨超.高校图书馆资源发现系统选型分析[D].保定:河北大学,2015.
[64] KLIEWER G, MONROE-GULICK A, GAMBLE S, et al. Using Primo for undergraduate research:a usability study[J]. Library hi tech, 2016, 34(4):566-584.
[65] TONYAN J, PIPER C. Discovery tools in the classroom:a usability study and implications for information literacy instruction[J]. Journal of Web librarianship, 2019, 13(1):1-19.
[66] 周欣,陆康.基于图书馆数字资源访问系统的读者行为数据挖掘研究[J].现代情报,2016,36(1):51-56.
[67] SEEBER K P. Teaching "format as a process" in an era of Web-scale discovery[J]. Reference services review, 2015, 43(1):19-30.
[68] CMOR D, LI X. Beyond boolean, towards thinking:discovery systems and information literacy[J]. Library management, 2012, 33(8/9):450-457.
[69] MUSSER L R, COOPEY B M. Impact of a discovery system on interlibrary loan[J]. College & research libraries, 2016, 77(5):643-653.
[70] CALVERT K. Maximizing academic library collections:measuring changes in use patterns owing to EBSCO discovery service[J]. College & research libraries, 2015,76(1):81-99.
[71] NICHOLS A F, CRIST E, SHERRIFF G, et al. What does it take to make discovery a success?:a survey of discovery tool adoption, instruction, and evaluation among academic libraries[J]. Journal of Web librarianship, 2017, 11(2):85-104.
[72] STONE G. The benefits of resource discovery for publishers:a librarian's view[J]. Learned publishing, 2016,28(2):106-113.
[73] ZHU J, KELLEY J. Collaborating to reduce content gaps in discovery:what publishers, discovery service providers, and libraries can do to close the gaps[J]. Science & technology libraries, 2015, 34(4):315-328.
[74] ROGERS E M. Diffusion of innovations[M]. New York:The Free Press,1983.
文章导航

/