[目的/意义] 开放科学环境对科学研究的透明性、严谨性和开放性提出了更高要求。在此背景下，旨在有效满足这种要求的新兴出版物注册式研究报告应运而生，进一步推动了开放科学的发展与演进。本文拟全面介绍注册式研究报告的产生背景与发展历程，试图窥见其在推进开放科学发展进程中的主要功能和核心价值。[方法/过程] 综合运用网络调研法和内容分析法，从注册式研究报告的产生背景、发展现状、内容构成、出版流程、主要功能及核心价值等方面系统梳理该新兴出版物的基本概况。[结果/结论] 注册式研究报告的突出特点主要体现在：①内容构成方面，注册式研究报告既包含最终研究成果又包含详细的研究计划；②出版流程方面，多数注册式研究报告分为两个阶段出版。这种新兴出版物有利于减少发表偏倚的发生，规范并革新传统出版流程，进而提高研究成果的透明性、可靠性及严谨性。
[Purpose/significance] The open scientific environment puts higher demands on the transparency, rigor and openness of scientific research. In this context, the Registered Reports on emerging publications, which aims to meet the demands, are rising and further promoting the development and evolution of open science. This paper intends to comprehensively introduce the background and development process of the Registered Reports and try to research its main function and core value in promoting the development of open science. [Method/process] Comprehensively used the network research method and content analysis method, the background of the Registered Reports, the development status, content composition, publishing process, main functions and core values were applied to systematically sort out the development of this emerging publication. [Result/conclusion] The outstanding characteristics of the Registered Reports are mainly reflected in 2 aspects:①in terms of content composition, Registered Reports not only includes the final research results, but also requires researchers to elaborate the research plan;②in terms of publishing process, most journals adopt the two-stage publishing form of submitting research plans and research results before and after collecting experimental data. Therefore, it is conducive to reduce the occurrence of publication bias,standardize and innovate the publishing process,and further improve the transparency, reliability and rigor of research results.
[1] 刘桂锋,钱锦琳,田丽丽. 开放科学:概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38(11):1-9.
[2] 陈秀娟,张志强. 开放科学的驱动因素、发展优势与障碍[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6):77-84.
[3] Elsevier. Open science[EB/OL].[2019-05-16].https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science.
[4] Center for Open Science. Preregistration[EB/OL].[2019-09-16].https://www.cos.io/prereg/.
[5] Center for Open Science. Registered reports[EB/OL].[2019-05-16]. http://www.cos.io/rr/.
[6] TONKS A. Registering clinical trials[J]. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.),1999,319(7224):1565-1568.
[7] GRAND J A, ROGELBERG S G, BANKS G C, et al. From outcome to process focus:fostering a more robust psychological science through registered reports and results-blind reviewing[J]. Perspectives on psychological science, 2018, 13(4):448-456.
[8] WISEMAN R, WATT C, KORNBROT D. Registered reports:an early example and analysis[J/OL].[2019-09-17].https://www.peerj.com/articles/6232.pdf.
[9] MEHLENBACHER A R. Registered reports:genre evolution and the research article[J]. Written communication, 2019,36(1):38-67.
[10] Elsevier. Splitting the review process into two stages[EB/OL].[2019-05-16]. https://www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/peer-review/spliting-the-review-process-into-two-stages.
[11] ALESSANDRO D. Collaborative Web between open and closed science[EB/OL].[2019-09-14].https://www.jcom.sissa.it/archive/07/02/Jcom0702(2008)C01/Jcom0702(2008)C01.pdf.
[12] The Royal Society Science Policy Centre report. Science as an open enterprise[EB/OL].[2019-09-14].https://www.royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE.pdf.
[13] 杨扬,沈志超,靳纯桥.发表偏倚的原因、后果与预防研究[J].编辑学报,2002(3):170-172.
[14] NOSEK B A, LAKENS D. Registered reports:a method to increase the credibility of published results.[J]. Social psychology, 2016, 45(3):137-141.
[15] CHAMBERS C D. The seven deadly sins of psychology:a manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice[M].State of New Jersey:Princeton University Press. 2017:178.
[16] NEWCOMBE R G. Towards a reduction in publication bias[J]. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 1987,295(6599):656-659.
[17] WALSTER G W, CLEARY T A. A proposal for a new editorial policy in the social sciences[J]. The American statistician, 1970, 24(2):16-19.
[18] CHAMBERS C D. Registered reports:a new publishing initiative at cortex[J]. Cortex, 2013, 49(3):609-610.
[19] Center for Open Science. Participating journals[EB/OL].[2019-05-16]. http://www.cos.io/rr/.
[20] Open Science framework[EB/OL].[2019-05-16].http://www.osf.io/.
[21] Zotero. Registered reports[EB/OL].[2019-05-16]. https://www.zotero.org/groups/479248/osf/items/collectionKey/KEJP68G9.
[22] MUNAFÒ M R. Improving the efficiency of grant and journal peer review:registered reports funding[J/OL]. Nicotine & tobacco research[2019-11-27].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28387844.
[23] PLOS BLOGS. PLOS ONE partners with the Children's Tumor Foundation to trial registered reports[EB/OL].[2019-05-16].https://www.blogs.plos.org/everyone/2017/09/26/registered-reports-with-ctf/.
[24] OSF Home. Template guide to authors and reviewers[EB/OL].[2019-05-16].https://www.osf.io/pukzy/.
[25] Center for Open Science. Registered reports details & workflow[EB/OL].[2019-05-16].https://www.cos.io/rr/.
[26] CHAMBERS C D. Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known[J]. Addiction,2015,110(1):10-11.
[27] OSF Home. Registered reports FAQ[EB/OL].[2019-05-18].https://osf.io/gha9f/.
[28] CHAMBERS C D, Mellor D T. Protocol transparency is vital for registered reports[J].Nature human behaviour,2018,2(11):791-792.
