情报研究

我国科研诚信政策变迁计量分析

  • 冯凌子 ,
  • 刘敬 ,
  • 袁军鹏
展开
  • 1 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190;
    3 中国科学院信息工程研究所 北京 100093;
    4 中国科学院大学网络空间安全学院 北京 100049
冯凌子(ORCID:0000-0003-3410-9023),博士研究生;刘敬,硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2019-05-15

  修回日期: 2019-10-27

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-05

基金资助

本文系2018年"中国科学院文献情报领域引进优秀人才计划"择优支持项目(科发规函字12号)和科技部科技创新战略研究专项"科技伦理体系研究"(项目编号:ZLY201950)研究成果之一。

Quantitative Analysis of the Changes of Research Integrity Policy in China

  • Feng Lingzi ,
  • Liu Jing ,
  • Yuan Junpeng
Expand
  • 1 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2 Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    3 Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093;
    4 School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2019-05-15

  Revised date: 2019-10-27

  Online published: 2020-05-05

摘要

[目的/意义] 对我国中央发布的科研诚信政策和地方响应情况的现状及变迁作了分析,以求把握政策发展态势与阶段重点,为科研诚信建设提供支撑,为我国科研诚信政策发展研究提供帮助。[方法/过程] 搜集整理108份与科研诚信相关的中央政策及80份参照落实中央政策的地方政策,使用政策文本计算与政策文献量化方法,对政策发布时间、发布机构、政策内容及政策响应情况的现状及其变迁进行分析梳理,得到了政策发布的时间特征、重要机构特征、内容侧重点变化以及政策响应的特征。[结果/结论] ①科研诚信相关治理措施早在1980年就有涉及,近年来围绕国家创新建设的需求发文数量骤增,治理的态度更坚决,措施办法也更加具体。②科研诚信的治理由中央政府领导,教育部与科技部是各个阶段的主要管理部门,相关部门逐渐加入进行共同治理,目前已形成合力的格局。③各部门的科研诚信治理着力点、对象与方法略有差异,但总体而言,从方法与目标上来看,逐渐从自我约束、道德教育转变到制度建设与道德建设齐抓共管。④全国范围内绝大多数的地方省市都积极响应了中央政策,采取措施进行科研诚信治理,但相对而言有一定的时滞。

本文引用格式

冯凌子 , 刘敬 , 袁军鹏 . 我国科研诚信政策变迁计量分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(9) : 73 -84 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.09.009

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper analyses the current situation and changes of the research integrity policy issued by the Chinese central government and the local response, in order to grasp the development trend and stage focus of the policy, provide support for the construction of research integrity, and provide help for the development of research integrity policy in China. [Method/process] This paper collected 108 policies related to research integrity issued by the central government and ministries, and 80 local policies for the implementation of the central policy. By using the policy text computing and policy documents quantitative research method, this paper analyzed and combed the current situation and changes of policy release time, publishing institutions, policy content and policy response, and obtained the time characteristics of policy release. Finally, this paper got the characteristics of the time of policy release, the characteristics of important institutions, the change of content focus and the characteristics of policy response. [Result/conclusion] ①Relevant governance measures of research integrity have been involved earlier. In recent years, China has put forward the need to build an innovative country, so the number of policy papers has increased sharply, the attitude to the governance of research integrity is more resolute, and the measures are more specific. ②The management of scientific research integrity is led by the central government. The Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology are the main administrative departments at all stages. Relevant departments have gradually joined in the joint management. At present, a pattern of joint efforts has been formed. ③There are slight differences in the focus, object and method of research integrity governance among different departments, but generally speaking, the trend is to gradually shift from self-restraint, moral education to system construction and moral construction. ④The vast majority of local provinces and municipalities throughout the country have responded positively to the central policy and taken measures to improve scientific research integrity, but there is a relative time lag.

参考文献

[1] 结果难服众学界期待公布韩春雨事件调查细节[EB/OL].[2019-04-30].http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2018/9/417149.shtm.
[2] STIGBRAND T. Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor Biology[EB/OL].[2019-04-30]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.
[3] 南大公布梁莹处理意见:取消研究生导师资格[EB/OL].[2019-04-30].http://js.people.com.cn/n2/2018/1215/c360307-32414128.html.
[4] 北电成立"翟天临事件调查组"[EB/OL].[2019-04-30].http://epaper.ynet.com/html/2019-02/12/content_319264.htm?div=-1.
[5] 刘延东:加强科研诚信学风建设促科学事业健康发展[EB/OL].[2019-04-30].http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2010-03/30/content_1569423.htm.
[6] 习近平:决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[R]. 北京:人民出版社, 2017:1-71.
[7] 2019年政府工作报告全文[EB/OL].[2019-04-30].http://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2019qglh/2019lhzfgzbg/index.htm.
[8] 黄萃. 政策文献量化研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2016.
[9] 裴雷, 孙建军, 周兆韬. 政策文本计算:一种新的政策文本解读方式[J]. 图书与情报, 2016(6):47-55.
[10] HUANG C, SU J, XIE X, et al. A bibliometric study of China's science and technology policies:1949-2010[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 102(2):1521-1539.
[11] 张剑, 黄萃, 叶选挺,等. 中国公共政策扩散的文献量化研究——以科技成果转化政策为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2016(2):145-155.
[12] 李燕萍, 吴绍棠, 郜斐,等. 改革开放以来我国科研经费管理政策的变迁、评介与走向——基于政策文本的内容分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(10):1441-1447,1453.
[13] 杨凯瑞, 何忍星, 钟书华. 中国中央政府支持创新创业发展政策文本量化研究(2003-2017年)——来自国务院及16部委的数据分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(15):107-114.
[14] ZHANG X, YANG F. Rural informatization policy evolution in China:a bibliometric study[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1):129-153.
[15] 黄萃, 苏竣, 施丽萍,等. 政策工具视角的中国风能政策文本量化研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(6):876-882,889.
[16] 袁军鹏, 淮孟姣, 潘云涛,等. 我国科研诚信研究发展概述:科学计量学视角[J]. 国防科技, 2017, 38(6):14-20.
[17] 田瑞强, 姚长青, 刘洢颖,等. 学术不端治理政策及案例计量研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(4):355-361.
[18] 靳彤, 张红伟, 赵勇. 政策文本计量视角下我国科研诚信治理的特征与启示[J]. 情报工程, 2018, 4(5):116-126.
[19] 黄萃, 任弢, 张剑. 政策文献量化研究:公共政策研究的新方向[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(2):129-137,158-159.
[20] 科学技术部科研诚信建设办公室. 科研诚信建设相关法律法规和文件汇编[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2017.
[21] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见》[EB/OL].[2019-04-30].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-05/30/content_5294886.htm.
文章导航

/