[目的/意义] 论文出版过程中，若能够合理有效地呈现出一篇学术论文的核心观点，不仅可以大大减少科研人员在查找和筛选文献上花费的时间，而且有助于阅读与理解。[方法/过程] 通过标注385篇XML格式期刊论文，构建了研究语料库，再利用关键词分析法对亮点的语言学特征进行分析，借助自然语言处理算法探索亮点的分布特征。[结果/结论] 亮点是一组规范的、语义明确的短句的集合，是一篇学术论文与其他论文相比较的新观点、新视角、新方法、新思路、新结果、新结论等内容的体现。亮点具有新颖性、简明性、易读性、"宣传"性等特点。亮点分为研究创新型亮点、研究方法型亮点、研究过程型亮点与研究结论型亮点，本文发现了亮点在正文和各章节的分布情况。
[Purpose/significance] In the process of publishing a paper, if the core viewpoint of an academic paper can be presented reasonably and effectively, it can not only greatly reduce the time spent by researchers in searching and screening literature, but also help to read and understand. [Method/process] By annotating 385 journal papers in XML format, a research corpus was constructed, and then the linguistic characteristics of highlights were analyzed by keyword analysis method, and the distribution characteristics of highlights were explored by natural language processing algorithm. [Result/conclusion] The highlight of this paper is the collection of a set of normative and clear-cut short sentences, which is the embodiment of new viewpoints, new perspectives, new methods, new ideas, new results and new conclusions in an academic paper compared with other papers. The highlights are novel, concise, readable and "propaganda". In addition, this paper divides the highlights into research innovation highlights, research methods highlights, research process highlights and research conclusion highlights, and finds the distribution of highlights in the text and chapters.
[1] Elsevier. Research highlights[EB/OL].[2018-11-18]. https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/highlights.html.
[2] HYLAND K, GUINDA C S. Stance and voice in written academic genres[M]. England:Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012.
[3] YANG W, WENHSIEN. Evaluative language and interactive discourse in journal article highlights[J]. English for specific purposes, 2016, 42:89-103.
[4] RONZANO F, SAGGION H. Knowledge extraction and modeling from scientific publications[J]. International workshop on semantic, analytics, visualization, 2016(9792):11-25.
[5] DAHL T. Contributing to the academic conversation:a study of new knowledge claims in economics and linguistics[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2008, 40(7):0-1201.
[6] FISAS B, SAGGION H, RONZANO F. On the discoursive structure of computer graphics research papers[C]//Proceedings of the 9th linguistic annotation workshop.Denver:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015:42-51.
[7] 温有奎, 吴广印. 碎片化科研创新点动态挖掘研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2014(7):25-32.
[8] 乐小虬. 领域内中文科技文献中新发现语言描述特征分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016(5):47-55.
[9] 温有奎,吴广印.碎片化科研创新点动态挖掘研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2014(7):25-32.
[10] 毛琛瑜,乐小虬.领域内中文科技文献中新发现语言描述特征分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2016, 32(5):47-55.
[11] 李瑛,周立.科技期刊论文创新点合理呈现的价值及理想模式[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2018,29(10):993-999.
[12] SCOTT M, TRIBBLE C. Textual patterns:key words and corpus analysis in language education[M]. Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 2006.
[13] 钟守满,张伟华.英汉言语行为动词分类及其语义认知解释[J].上饶师范学院学报, 2004(5):88-91.
[14] 陈昌来.现代汉语动词的句法语义属性研究[M].上海:学林出版社, 2002.
[15] 李怀祖.管理学科博士论文撰写探讨[J].学位与研究生教育,2000(3):21-27.
