综述述评

国际信息素养范式演变

  • 彭立伟 ,
  • 高洁
展开
  • 1 天津师范大学图书馆 天津 300387;
    2 天津师范大学管理学院 天津 300387
彭立伟(ORCID:0000-0001-7294-9782),副研究馆员,硕士,E-mail:pengliwei@tjnu.edu.cn;高洁(ORCID:0000-0002-3251-9937),教授,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2019-05-28

  修回日期: 2019-11-26

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学青年基金项目"社会化媒体情境下高校信息素养内容框架与教育实践实证研究"(项目编号:15CTQ013)研究成果之一。

Research on the Paradigm Shift of International Information Literacy

  • Peng Liwei ,
  • Gao Jie
Expand
  • 1 Tianjin Normal University Library, Tianjin 300387;
    2 Management School of Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387

Received date: 2019-05-28

  Revised date: 2019-11-26

  Online published: 2020-05-05

摘要

[目的/意义] 从整体上阐释国际信息素养发展脉络,为国内发展提供参考。[方法/过程] 以SCI、SSCI数据库中主题为信息素养的文献作为统计源,采用文献计量学方法进行分析,对分析结果中概念型文献进行重点解读。[结果/结论] 根据信息环境、信息技术、信息素养内涵、内容框架、教育理念与实践,信息素养发展历程从时序演变角度可分为1970s、1980s、1990s-2004年、2004年-今四个阶段,第一代信息素养与第二代信息素养两大范式。其中第二代信息素养将语境从教育领域拓展到工作领域和日常生活领域,以社会建构主义和关联主义为指导,在内涵上从一系列个人技能延伸到包含认知、元认知、情感、态度等多因素的协作社会实践;在教育内容方面,从资源维、技术维、行为维、过程维拓展到更加强调过程维、交流维与信息素养阈概念。

本文引用格式

彭立伟 , 高洁 . 国际信息素养范式演变[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(9) : 133 -141 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.09.015

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to explain the development of international information literacy and provides reference for domestic development. [Method/process] Based on the literature in SCI、SSCI with the subject of information literacy, this paper used bibliometric method for analysis, and focused on the conceptual literatures in the analysis results. [Result/conclusion] The information literacy development process is divided into 4 stages(1970s,1980s,1990s-2004,2004-present),and two paradigms(information literacy1.0 and information literacy2.0) according to information landscape, technology, information literacy connotation, framework, educational philosophy and practice chronologically. Guided by social constructivism and connectivism, information literacy2.0 extends the context from education to work and daily life, and extends from a set of individual skills to collaborative social practice including cognitive, metacognitive, emotional, attitude factors and so on. In higher education, information literacy education expands from source approach, technical approach, behavioral approach, process approach to more emphasis on process approach, communication approach and threshold concepts.

参考文献

[1] 闵红武. 十年来我国高校图书馆信息素养教育研究综述[J]. 图书与情报,2008(4):63-67, 102.
[2] 杜玉霞. 美国信息素养教育与研究的启示[J]. 电化教育研究,2005(10):42-44.
[3] 李婷婷,谷秀洁. 英国高校信息素养教育进展[J]. 图书与情报,2012(1):48-55.
[4] 谷秀洁,靳萍. 澳大利亚的大学信息素养教育进展[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2012,30(2):109-113.
[5] 蔡明月,方碧玲. 信息素养文献之书目计量研究[J].教育数据与图书馆学,2006,44(2):133-152.
[6] PINTO M, ESCALONA-FERNANDEZ M I, PULGARIN A. Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences:a bibliometric study (1974-2011)[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(3):1071-94.
[7] NAGASAWA T. A systematic literature review on building collaboration between teaching faculty and librarians in university education:based on English articles on information literacy instruction in library and lnformation science[J]. Library and information science, 2017(77):51-86.
[8] WALTON G, CLELAND J. Information literacy empowerment or reproduction in practice? A discourse analysis approach[J]. Journal of documentation, 2017, 73(4):582-94.
[9] SPIRANEC S, ZORICA M B. Speculations in documentation information literacy 2.0:hype or discourse refinement?[J]. Journal of documentation, 2010, 66(1):140-53.
[10] KUHN T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago:university of Chicago press, 2012.
[11] SHNEIDER A M. Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist[J]. Trends in biochemical sciences, 2009, 34(5):217-223.
[12] SUNDIN O. Negotiations on information-seeking expertise[J]. Journal of documentation, 2008, 64(1):24-44.
[13] BEHRENS S J. A conceptual analysis and histotical overview of information literacy[J]. College & research libraries, 1994, 55(4):309-22.
[14] SNAVELY L, COOPER N. The information literacy debate[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 1997, 23(1):9-14.
[15] BRUCE C. The seven faces of information literacy[M]. Adelaide:Auslib Press, 1997.
[16] NEVISON J M. Computing in the liberal arts college[J]. Science, 1976, 194(4263):396-402.
[17] HORTON Jr F W. Information literacy vs. computer literacy[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 1983, 9(4):14-16.
[18] GILSTER P. Digital literacy[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
[19] GURAK L J. Cyberliteracy:Navigating the Internet with awareness[M]. London:Yale University Press, 2001.
[20] THOMAS S, JOSEPH C, LACCETTI J, et al. Transliteracy:crossing divides[J/OL].[2020-04-08].https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2060/1908.
[21] ZURKOWSKI P G, KELLY J V, 刘千卉,等. 信息素养的历史与实践之旅[J].图书情报知识, 2016(3):33-38.
[22] 薛调. 美国大学图书馆利用教育的发展历程研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2013(4):21-30.
[23] ZURKOWSKI P G. The information service environment:relationships and priorities[R/OL].[2020-02-16]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf.
[24] TAYLOR R S. Reminiscing about the future:professional education and the information environment[J]. Library journal, 1979, 104(16):1871-75.
[25] KUHLTHAU C C. Information skills for an information society:a review of research. an ERIC information analysis product[M/OL]. NewYork:Syracuse University, 1987.[2020-02-16]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED297740.pdf.
[26] American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy:Final report,1989[R/OL].[2020-02-16]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.
[27] BAWDEN D. Information and digital literacies:a review of concepts[J]. Journal of documentation, 2001, 57(2):218-59.
[28] DOYLE C S. Information literacy in an information society:a concept for the information age[J]. Emergency librarian, 1994, 61(1):4.
[29] TUOMINEN K, SAVOLAINEN R, TALJA S. Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice[J]. Library quarterly, 2005, 75(3):329-45.
[30] ELMBORG J. Critical information literacy:implications for instructional practice[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2006, 32(2):192-9.
[31] FARKAS M. Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy[J]. Library hi tech, 2012, 30(1):82-94.
[32] MACKEY T P, JACOBSON T E. Reframing Information literacy as a metaliteracy[J]. College & research libraries, 2011, 72(1):62-78.
[33] Townsend L, Brunetti K, Hofer A R. Threshold concepts and information literacy[J]. Portal:libraries and the academy, 2011, 11(3):853-869.
[34] LLOYD A, WILLIAMSON K. Towards an understanding of information literacy in context-Implications or research[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2008, 40(1):3-12.
[35] LLOYD A. Information literacy landscapes:an emerging picture[J]. Journal of documentation, 2006, 62(5):570-83.
[36] ACRL. Framework for information literacy for higher education[EB/OL].[2020-02-16].http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
[37] GODWIN P. Information literacy and Web 2.0:is it just hype?[J]. Program-electronic library and information systems, 2009, 43(3):264-74.
[38] KUGLITSCH R Z. Teaching for Transfer:Reconciling the Framework with Disciplinary Information Literacy[J]. Portal-libraries and the academy, 2015, 15(3):457-70.
[39] GUTH L F, ARNOLD J M, BIELAT V E, et al. Faculty Voices on the Framework:Implications for Instruction and Dialogue[J]. Portal-libraries and the academy, 2018, 18(4):693-718.
[40] HARMEYER D. The reference interview today:negotiating and answering questions face to face, on the phone, and virtually[M]. Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.
[41] BURKHARDT J M. Teaching information literacy reframed:50+ framework-based exercises for creating information-literate learners[M]. Chicago:American Library Association, 2017.
[42] BRUCE C. Information literacy:a phenomenography[D]. Armidale:University of New England, 1996.
[43] CHEUK W B. Exploring information literacy in the workplace:a qualitative study of engineers using the sense-making approach[J].International forum on information and documentation, 1998, 23(2):30-38.
[44] 张艳秋.理解媒介与素养起源、范式与路径[M].北京:人民出版社,2012:14.
文章导航

/