[目的/意义] 需求一直是提高服务质量和服务水平的关键所在，从客户需求视角探究有效的知识服务方式对于保障智库的知识服务质量，提高智库的服务水平和影响力具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 通过文献回顾总结客户对智库知识服务的需求类型和智库的知识服务方式，采用问卷调查法面向政府工作人员和社会公众两类客户群体搜集数据，分析客户对智库知识服务的认知程度、需求强度以及服务方式的选择意愿，并通过偏最小二乘回归模型分析智库的客户需求与知识服务方式的作用关系。[结果/结论] 政府工作人员对智库知识服务的认知程度显著高于社会公众，而且，政府工作人员更了解党政智库，社会公众更了解高校智库；客户对智库的知识服务需求强度从高到低分别为人才支持、政策研究、决策咨询和舆论宣传；客户对智库不同知识服务方式的选择意愿从高到低依次是公开媒体、公开出版、线下交流和内部合作，而且客户的各种知识服务需求正向显著影响智库的不同知识服务方式。
[Purpose/significance] Requirement has always been the key to improve service quality and level. Exploring effective knowledge service mode from the perspective of client requirement is of great significance to guarantee the knowledge service quality and improve the service level and influence of think tanks. [Method/process] Through literature review, this paper summarized the types of client requirements for think-tank knowledge service and the knowledge service modes of think tanks. Then a questionnaire survey was used to collect data from two client groups, including government employees and the public. This paper analyzed the clients’ cognition degree, intensity of requirements and service mode selection intention for think tank knowledge services, and analyzed the relationships between client requirements and knowledge service modes of think tanks through partial least squares regression model. [Result/conclusion] The cognition degree of government employees to think tank knowledge service is significantly higher than that of the public. And government employees have a better understanding of party and government think tanks, while the public has a better understanding of university think tanks. The intensity of clients’ requirements for the knowledge services of think tanks from high to low are talent support, policy research, decision-making consultation and public opinion propaganda. Clients’ willingness to choose different knowledge service modes of think tanks is, from high to low, open media, open publication, offline communication and internal cooperation. Moreover, clients’ requirements for various knowledge service modes have a significant positive impact on the different knowledge service modes of think tanks.
[1] 耿瑞利, 申静. 基于开放式创新的智库知识管理模型构建及应用[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017,61(2):121-128.
[2] MCGANN J G. 2018 Global go to think tank index report[R/OL].[2019-06-28]. https://www.gotothinktank.com/global-goto-think-tank-index.
[3] 上海社会科学院智库研究中心. 2018年中国智库报告[R/OL].[2019-06-28]. http://www.pjzgzk.org.cn/upload/file/20190320/20190320110443_241.pdf.
[4] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅. 关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见[EB/OL].[2019-07-12]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-01/20/content_2807126.htm.
[5] 文少保. 高校智库服务政府决策的逻辑起点、难点与策略——国家治理能力现代化的视角[J]. 中国高教研究, 2015(1):34-38.
[6] 李永先, 吕诚诚. 基于利益相关者理论的智库舆论影响力研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2018(1):39-44.
[7] SHELBURNE W A. E-book usage in an academic library:user attitudes and behaviors[J]. Library collections, acquisitions, and technical services, 2009, 33(2/3):59-72.
[8] 曹树金,陈忆金,杨涛.基于用户需求的图书馆用户满意实证研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2013,39(5):60-75.
[9] VERDEGEM P, VERLEYE G. User-centered e-government in practice:a comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction[J]. Government information quarterly, 2009, 26(3):487-497.
[10] 曹勇,佘硕,长平彰夫.基于客户视角的知识密集服务业对日本制造企业创新的作用研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(2):85-89.
[11] 柏必成. 咨询需求、思想产品与传播能力:智库影响力的一个分析框架[J]. 学习论坛, 2015, 31(9):51-55.
[12] ZHU X. Government advisors or public advocates? roles of think tanks in china from the perspective of regional variations[J]. China quarterly, 2011, 207(207):668-686.
[13] MCKINLAY P. Bridging a strategic gap:a think tank for local government in New Zealand[J]. Asia pacific journal of public administration, 2016, 38(2):131-137.
[14] 龚会莲. 研究成果、传递通道与高校智库治理研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(7):42-48.
[15] CRAFT J, HOWLETT M. The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems:the impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice[J]. Policy & society, 2013, 32(3):187-197.
[16] VESELY A. Externalization of policy advice:theory, methodology and evidence[J]. Policy & society, 2013, 32(3):199-209.
[17] 任恒. 政府购买社会智库服务:实现机制、运行困境及其推进策略[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2017(8):40-46,123.
[18] MCNUTT K, MARCHILDON G. Think Tanks and the Web:measuring visibility and influence[J]. Canadian public policy, 2009, 35(2):219-236.
[19] LALUEZA F, GIRONA R. The impact of think tanks on mass media discourse regarding the economic crisis in Spain[J]. Public relations review, 2016, 42(2):271-278.
[20] ARSHED N. The origins of policy ideas:the importance of think tanks in the enterprise policy process in the UK[J]. Journal of business research, 2017(71):74-83.
[21] 万喆.中国智库建设亟须对接时代发展和国家战略[J].金融论坛,2015,20(9):9-17.
[22] 王眉. 智库国际传播与对外话语体系构建[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 36(6):94-100,2.
[23] MEDVETZ T. "Public policy is like having a vaudeville act":languages of duty and difference among think tank-affiliated policy experts[J]. Qualitative sociology, 2010, 33(4):549-562.
[24] 曹如中,梁亚丽,宋雅雯,等.智库建设模式的国际比较及其启示[J].情报理论与实践, 2017,41(5):97-103.
[25] 柯银斌,吕晓莉. 智库是怎样炼成的?——国外智库国际化案例研究[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2016.
[26] 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇, 邱均平. 美国兰德公司发展及对中国智库建设的启示[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 22(2):125-131.
[27] 陈英霞, 刘昊. 美国一流高校智库人员配置与管理模式研究——以斯坦福大学胡佛研究所为例[J]. 比较教育研究, 2014, 36(2):66-71.
[28] 申静, 张璐, 刘莹. 社会智库人才机制初探[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2019, 51(1):92-102.
[29] MCCRIGHT A M, DUNLAP R E. Defeating kyoto:the conservative movement's impact on US climate change policy[J]. Social problems, 2003, 50(3):348-373.
[30] KRYMSKAYA A S. Information and analysis centers in the system of state-level decision making[J]. Herald of the Russian academy of sciences, 2016, 86(6):527-533.
[31] Zhu X. The influence of think tanks in the Chinese policy process:Different ways and mechanisms[J]. Asian survey, 2009, 49(2):333-357.
[32] KELSTRUP J D. Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK[J]. Policy sciences, 2017, 50(1):125-137.
[33] BENNETT S, CORLUKA A, DOHERTY J, et al. Influencing policy change:the experience of health think tanks in low- and middle-income countries[J].Health policy and planning, 2012,27(3):194-203.
[34] 庞莉. 智库型图书馆知识服务的需求分析及优化策略[J]. 图书与情报, 2018, 182(4):111-116.
[35] 白阳, 张心怡. 汇聚想法:数据驱动下的智库协同创新服务模式研究[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(7):25-31.
[36] 邹逸安.国外思想库及其成功的经验[J].中国软科学,1999(6):88-90,108.
[37] GOLAFSHANI N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research[J]. The qualitative report, 2003, 8(4):597-606.
[38] RINGLE C M, SARSTEDT M, STRAUB D. A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly[J]. MIS quarterly (MISQ), 2012, 36(1):3-14.
[39] 申静,张璐,王若佳.中国智库微博内容特征分析——基于新浪微博的实证研究[J].情报科学,2019,37(12):3-10.
[40] 清华大学公共管理学院智库研究中心. 清华大学智库大数据报告2018[R/OL].[2019-07-05]. http://www.199it.com/archives/890149.html.
[41] 杨思洛, 冯雅. 中国智库网络影响力分系统对比评价研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2017,23(2):68-78.
[42] 栾瑞英, 初景利. 4种智库影响力评价指标体系评介与比较[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(22):27-35.
[43] 国务院发展研究中心.2018年度国务院发展研究中心部门决算[R/OL].[2019-12-05]. http://www.drc.gov.cn/n/20190719/1-477-2898981.htm.
[44] 朱旭峰. 中国社会政策变迁中的专家参与模式研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2011, 25(2):1-27,243.
