图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 12: 87 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.12.010

情报研究

学者学术影响力识别研究——基于引文全数据的视角

  • 李铮 ,
  • 邓三鸿 ,
  • 孔嘉 ,
  • 张艺炜
展开
  • 1. 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023;
    2. 江苏省数据工程与知识服务重点实验室 南京 210023
李铮(ORCID:0000-0003-4569-298X),硕士研究生;孔嘉(ORCID:0000-0002-4285-9636),硕士研究生;张艺炜(ORCID:0000-0001-6006-0396),博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2019-09-30

  修回日期: 2020-02-09

  网络出版日期: 2020-06-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目"大数据环境下学术成果真实价值与影响的实时预测及长期评价研究"（项目编号：19BTQ062）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on Scholar's Academic Influence——From the Perspective of Full Citation Data

  • Li Zheng ,
  • Deng Sanhong ,
  • Kong Jia ,
  • Zhang Yiwei
Expand
  • 1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
    2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, Nanjing 210023

Received date: 2019-09-30

  Revised date: 2020-02-09

  Online published: 2020-06-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 当前普遍应用的引文评价指标忽视了引文内容的差异性，本研究试图加入引用强度、引用位置、引用情感3个因素，并结合作者贡献度，提出一个基于引文的学术影响力评价指标。[方法/过程] 给出一个作者贡献度的计算公式，利用层次分析法确定引用强度、引用位置的权重，结合引用强度计算作者学术影响力AAI指标。[结果/结论] 通过实例效果显示，AAI指标综合考虑引用内容和作者贡献度，给简单的被引次数增加区分度，为学者学术评价提供新的思路。

关键词： 引用内容分析; 学术评价; 层次分析法; 作者贡献度

本文引用格式

李铮 , 邓三鸿 , 孔嘉 , 张艺炜 . 学者学术影响力识别研究——基于引文全数据的视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(12) : 87 -94 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.12.010

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]The commonly used citation evaluation index ignores the difference of citation content. This study attempts to add 3 factors, namely, citation intensity, citation location and citation sentiment, and combine the author contribution to propose the evaluation index of academic influence based on citation.[Method/process] This paper gave a formula for calculating the author contribution, used Analytic Hierarchy Process to define the weight of citation intensity and citation location, and comprehensively calculated the index of author's academic influence with citation intensity.[Result/conclusion] The example shows that AAI index comprehensively considers citation content and author contribution, increases the discrimination of simple citation frequency, and provides new ideas for the scholar's academic evaluation.

Key words： citation analysis; academic evaluation; analytic hierarchy process; author contribution

参考文献

[1] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》[EB/OL].[2019-09-29]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
[2] 叶继元. 引文法既是定量又是定性的评价法[J]. 图书馆, 2005(1):43-45.
[3] 赵蓉英, 曾宪琴, 陈必坤. 全文本引文分析——引文分析的新发展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(9):129-135.
[4] 胡志刚. 全文引文分析方法与应用[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2014.
[5] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(3):741-754.
[6] 蒋国华, 方勇. 科学计量学与同行评议[J]. 中国科技论坛, 1998(6):25-28.
[7] 高志, 张志强. 个人学术影响力定量评价方法研究综述[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(1):133-138.
[8] GARFIELD E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060):471-479.
[9] GUPTA H M, CAMPANHA J R, PESCE R A G. Power-law distributions for the citation index of scientific publications and scientists[J]. Brazilian journal of physics, 2005, 35(4a):981-986.
[10] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA CPNAS, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[11] RADICCHI F, FORTUNATO S, MARKINES B, et al. Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists[J]. Physical reviewe, 2009, 80(5):056103.
[12] WAN J K, HUA P H, ROUSSEAU R. The pure h-index:calculating an author's h-index by taking co-authors into account[J]. Collnet journal of scientometrics & information management, 2007, 1(2):1-5.
[13] TSCHARNTKE T, HOCHBERG M E, RAND T A, et al. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications[J]. PLoS biology, 2007, 5(1):e18.
[14] SCHREIBER M. To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts[J]. New journal of physics, 2008, 10(4):040201.
[15] LARIVI? RE V, SUGIMOTO C R, BERGERON P. In their own image? a comparison of doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2013, 64(5):1045-1054.
[16] BERTOLI-BARSOTTI L, LANDO T. On a formula for the h-index[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(4):762-776.
[17] 何祎雯, 王博雅, 钟云志. 基于作者主要贡献的科研人员(h'w)指数研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(7):167-175.
[18] PRIEM J, HEMMINGER B H. Scientometrics 2.0:new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web[J]. First monday, 2010, 15(7):5.
[19] 刘春丽. Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学:选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14):52-56.
[20] 刘晓娟, 周建华, 尤斌. 基于Mendeley与WoS的选择性计量指标与传统科学计量指标相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(3):114-120.
[21] 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇, 谭洁. 基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016(1):96-108.
[22] 杨瑞仙, 李贤, 李志. 学术评价方法研究进展[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(8):110-116.
[23] 王剑, 高峰, 满芮, 等. 基于引用频次和内容分析的引文分布与动机关系研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(9):100-103.
[24] VOOS H, DAGAEV K S. Are all citations equal? or, did we Op. Cit. your idem?[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 1976, 1(6):19-21.
[25] MARI?I? S, SPAVENTI J, PAVI?I? L, et al. Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(6):530-540.
[26] CANO V. Citation behavior:classification, utility, and location[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989, 40(4):284-290.
[27] SOMBATSOMPOP N, KOSITCHAIYONG A, MARKPIN T, et al. Scientific evaluations of citation quality of international research articles in the SCI database:Thailand case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(3):521-535.
[28] DING Y, LIU X, GUO C, et al. The distribution of references across texts:some implications for citation analysis[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(3):583-592.
[29] 刘盛博, 丁堃. 基于引用内容的引文评价分析[C]//第九届中国科技政策与管理学术年会论文集. 济南:中国科学学与科技政策研究会, 2013.
[30] ZHU X, TURNEY P, LEMIRE D, et al. Measuring academic influence:not all citations are equal[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(2):408-427.
[31] 魏杨烨, 孙玉琦, 汪琦凡. 基于引用频次和引用内容的引文评价分析[J]. 情报探索, 2016(8):116-120.
[32] 耿树青, 杨建林. 基于引用情感的论文学术影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(12):93-98.
[33] HOUTEN B A V, PHELPS J, BARNES M, et al. Evaluating scientific impact[J]. Environmental health perspectives, 2000, 108(9):A392-A393.
[34] MARI?I? S, SPAVENTI J, PAVI?I? L, et al. Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(6):530-540.
[35] 章成志, 李卓, 赵梦圆, 等. 基于引文内容的中文图书被引行为研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(3):96-109.
[36] SPIEGEL-ROSING I. Science studies:bibliometric and content analysis[J]. Social studies of science, 1977, 7(1):97-113.
[37] TEUFEL S. Automatic classification of citation function[C]//Proc. 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Sydney:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.
[38] 刘盛博, 王博, 唐德龙, 等. 基于引用内容的论文影响力研究——以诺贝尔奖获得者论文为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(24):109-114.
[39] HAGEN N T, ROBERT D S. Harmonic allocation of authorship credit:source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis[J]. PLoS ONE, 2008, 3(12):e4021.
[40] 朱庆华. 信息分析:基础、方法及应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2004:206-218.
[41] 杨瑞英. 体裁分析的应用:应用语言学学术文章结构分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2006(10):29-34
[42] SIMKIN M V, ROYCHOWDHURY V P. Read before you cite![J]. Complex systems, 2002, 14:269-274.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉