[目的/意义] 探索有效的经典阅读推广路径，对大学生的经典阅读行为形成激励与肯定，强化经典阅读推广在大学生人才培养过程中的作用和地位。[方法/过程] 对西南交通大学图书馆认证式经典阅读推广案例进行实证分析，从"通识课程认证、第二课堂认证、'青马工程'培养项目认证、读书工作坊认证"4种认证形式及"测试法、谈话法、陈述法、观察法、举证法"5种评估方法出发，深入分析认证式经典阅读推广路径及其相关问题。[结果/结论] 认证式经典阅读推广可对大学生经典阅读行为起到激励与肯定作用，强化经典阅读推广在高校育人过程中的地位，为高校图书馆经典阅读推广服务于本科教学及人才培养进行有益探索。
[Purpose/significance] To explore an effective way to promote classic reading, to form a certain incentive and affirmation for college students' classic reading, and to strengthen the role and position of classic reading promotion in the process of talent cultivation.[Method/process] This paper made an empirical analysis on the promotion cases of the certified classical reading in the library of Southwest Jiaotong University, and demonstrated the certified classical reading promotion paths and related problems in depth from 4 certification forms of Certificate-based the general course, Certificate-based the second class certification, Certificate-based Young Marxist Training Project, Certificate-based reading workshop and 5 evaluation methods of test method, conversation method, statement method, observation method and proof method.[Result/conclusion] To a certain extent, the promotion of certified classical reading has encouraged and affirmed the classical reading of college students, and also reflected the responsibility and contribution of the promotion of classical reading in college education and ideological and political education, which has made a beneficial exploration for the promotion of classical reading in college library and the library's service to teaching and personnel training.
[1] 国家新闻出版广电总局.关于印发《全民阅读"十三五"时期发展规划》的通知[EB/OL].[2020-04-21]. http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2016-12/27/c_129421928.htm.
[2] 喻梦倩,李泰峰,侯壮.高校图书馆渐进式读者培训模式研究——以电子科技大学图书馆为例[J].大学图书馆学报,2019,37(2):75-82.
[3] 于友先.全民阅读的实质是"经典阅读"[J].中国出版,2017(8):3-6.
[4] 王波.王波谈高校图书馆阅读推广的发展方向[J].晋图学刊,2019(4):1-12.
[5] 马早明,陈晓菲.东南亚国家科技大学通识课程模式探析——以南洋理工大学为例[J].比较教育研究,2014,36(11):74-78.
[6] COLARDYN D, BJORNAVOLD J. Validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning:policy and practices in EU Member States[J]. European journal of education, 2004, 39(1):69-89.
[7] 高晓晶,喻梦倩,杨家燕.高校图书馆阅读推广课程的探索与实践——以电子科技大学公选课"大学生阅读素养"为例[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(S1):49-52.
[8] 叶勤.基于"第二课堂"制度的高校阅读推广创新[J].管理观察,2018(29):136-138,141.
[9] 谷秀洁,张赞魁.推荐书目与图书馆阅读推广[J].山东图书馆学刊,2011(3):62-65.
[10] 赵晨洁,叶志锋.大学生经典阅读书目体系构建及推广策略研究[J].图书馆学研究,2019(8):79-86.
[11] 王文中,张锐.大学生阅读推广的联动与创新发展研究——以青岛职业技术学院图书馆"阅读工程"为例[J].青岛职业技术学院学报,2016,29(2):79-82.
[12] 国务院.国务院关于印发国家教育事业发展"十三五"规划的通知[EB/OL].[2020-04-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-01/19/content_5161341.htm.
[13] 陈玲,陶好飞,谢明昊.论第二课堂在人才培养过程中的作用——以高校一二课堂学习联动为中心[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):13-23.
[14] 邓晶.高校第二课堂对大学生学习方式的影响研究——以"985高校"学术科技创新活动为例[J].高教探索,2018(1):11-15,87.
[15] 佟宇.高校学生党建工作与"青马工程"内在联动机制研究[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(3):125-130.
[16] 李明,仲伟合. 翻译工作坊教学探微[J]. 中国翻译,2010(4):32-36.
[17] 王婧. MTI(笔译)翻译工作坊教学模式研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2017.
[18] 胡磊.高校读书工作坊对大学生读书兴趣提升的途径探索[J].科技视界,2016(27):155,203.
[19] 杨志明,杨婷.阅读能力测试及其测量学分析[J].教育测量与评价,2018(3):5-13.
