图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 14: 74 - 84

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.14.008

情报研究

科学文献被引轨迹的跨学科特征影响研究

  • 石燕青 ,
  • 赵一方
展开
  • 1 南京农业大学信息科技学院 南京 210095;
    2 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023
石燕青(ORCID:0000-0002-1091-7926),讲师,博士,E-mail:yqs4869@njau.edu.cn;赵一方(ORCID:0000-0001-8675-9322),硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2019-11-25

  修回日期: 2020-03-27

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-20

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金项目"引文扩散理论及实证研究"（项目编号：71874077）研究成果之一。

收起

The Influence of Interdisciplinarity on Citation Trajectory in Scientific Literature

  • Shi Yanqing ,
  • Zhao Yifang
Expand
  • 1 College of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing 210095;
    2 Information Management School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

Received date: 2019-11-25

  Revised date: 2020-03-27

  Online published: 2020-07-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 文献引用不仅是静态的统计分布，也是一个复杂的动态发展过程。对于引文曲线的变化及其影响因素进行进一步探索，有助于了解某一学科的文献生命周期和动态发展过程，同时对科学预测和科研评估也具有潜在价值。[方法/过程] 对不同类型的引文轨迹进行识别和分类，研究各类型引文轨迹的特征、时间分布以及其他可能包含在引文曲线中的信息。对论文的跨学科程度进行测度，考察跨学科程度与引文轨迹之间的关系。[结果/结论] 在不同的文献累积引用水平下，都存在"持续性"和"暂时性"两种引用模式。对于高被引文献，跨学科程度与其累积被引趋势并无明显关系，但是对于区分"持续性"和"暂时性"引用具有一定程度的影响作用。

关键词： 引文分析; 引文曲线; 引用模式; 跨学科特征

本文引用格式

石燕青 , 赵一方 . 科学文献被引轨迹的跨学科特征影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(14) : 74 -84 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.14.008

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper attempt to investigate differences among citation trajectories in subpopulations of articles in the field of library and information science, and analyze the underlying factors. [Method/process] Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was applied to the citation curves of articles to distinguish among the development trajectories. The interdisciplinarity were measured to investigate the relationship between the interdisciplinary degree and the citation trajectory. [Result/conclusion] There are two citation modes, "persistent" and "temporary", at different cumulative cite levels. As a predictor variable, interdisciplinarity do not affect the levels of aggregated citations but only the persistence of citations.

Key words： citation anaysis; citation trajectory; citation mode; interdisciplinary research

参考文献

[1] BORNMANN L, MUTZ R, NEUHAUS C, et al. Use of citation counts for research evaluation:standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results[J]. Ethics in dcience and environmental politics, 2008, 8(1):93-102.
[2] LINE M B, SANDISON A. "Obsolescence" and changes in the use of literature with time[J]. Journal of documentation, 1974, 30(3):283-350.
[3] AMIN M, MABE M A. Impact factors:use and abuse[J]. Medicina (Buenos Aires), 2003, 63(4):347-354.
[4] AVRAMESCU A. Actuality and obsolescence of scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979, 30(5):296-303.
[5] 李江, 姜明利, 李玥婷. 引文曲线的分析框架研究——以诺贝尔奖得主的引文曲线为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2):41-49.
[6] VAN RAAN A F J. Sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3):467-472.
[7] LANGE L L. Sleeping beauties in psychology:comparisons of "hits" and "missed signals" in psychological journals[J]. History of psychology, 2005, 8(2):194-217.
[8] MINGERS J. Shooting stars and sleeping beauties:the secret life of citations[C]//The 22nd European conference on operational research(Euro XXⅡ). Prague:Kent Academic Repository, 2007:8-11.
[9] VAN DALEN H P, HENKENS K. Signals in science-on the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 64(2):209-233.
[10] 周晓英, 董伟, 朱小梅, 等. 图书馆学情报学高影响力论文特征及所反映的学科差异分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(4):99-109.
[11] VANCLAY J K. Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(2):265-271.
[12] 王剑, 高峰, 王健, 等. 被引频次与引用认知相关性的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(13):95-99.
[13] 牛昱昕, 宗乾进, 袁勤俭. 开放存取论文下载与引用情况计量研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(4):119-127.
[14] 成颖. 面向学术新人的相关性判据研究——基于本科课程论文的内容分析[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(9):922-934.
[15] BORNMANN L, LEYDESDORFF L, WANG J. How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2014, 8(1):175-180.
[16] 闵超, DING Y, 李江, 等. 单篇论著的引文扩散[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(4):341-350.
[17] FU L D, ALIFERIS C F. Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature[J].Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1):257-270.
[18] ROLDAN-VALADEZ E, RIOS C. Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation:multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals[J].European journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2015, 27(2):115-122.
[19] BORDONS M, MORILLO F, GOMEZ I. Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools[M]//Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, 2005:437-456.
[20] LEVITT J M, THELWALL M. The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles:interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(1):45-67.
[21] KWON S, SOLOMON G E A, YOUTIE J, et al. A measure of knowledge flow between specific fields:implications of interdisciplinarity for impact and funding[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(10):e0185583.
[22] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, COSTA F D. Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(1):317-336.
[23] BHAT H S, HUANG L H, RODRIGUEZ S, et al. Citation Prediction Using Diverse Features[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop. Atlantic:IEEE, 2015:589-596.
[24] PONOMAREV I V, LAWTON B K, WILLIAMS D E, et al. Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0:can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(3):755-765.
[25] RINIA E J, VAN LEEUWEN T N, VAN RAAN A F J. Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 53(2):241-248.
[26] LEVITT J M, THELWALL M. Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? a macrolevel study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(12):1973-1984.
[27] WANG J, THIJS B, GLÄNZEL W. Interdisciplinarity and impact:distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(5):e0127298.
[28] 苏新宁.提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(4):47-53.
[29] MINGERS J. Exploring the dynamics of journal citations:modelling with S-curves[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2008, 59(8):1013-1025.
[30] MINGERS J, BURRELL Q L. Modeling citation behavior in management science journals[J]. Information processing & management, 2006, 42(6):1451-1464.
[31] PILKINGTON A. Modeling citation diffusion:innovation management literature[J]. International journal of innovation and technology management, 2013, 10(1):1350004.
[32] BOUABID H. Revisiting citation aging:a model for citation distribution and life-cycle prediction[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1):199-211.
[33] NADARAJAH S, KOTZ S. Models for citation behavior[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(2):291-305.
[34] NAGIN D S. Group-based modeling of development[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2005.
[35] NAGIN D S, ODGERS C L. Group-based trajectory modeling (nearly) two decades later[J]. Journal of quantitative criminology, 2010, 26(4), 445-453.
[36] BOUABID H. Revisiting citation aging:a model for citation distribution and life-cycle prediction[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1):199-211.
[37] PORTER A L, ROESSNER J D, COHEN A S. Interdisciplinary research:meaning, metrics and nurture[J]. Research evaluation, 2006, 15(3):187-195.
[38] CARLEY S, PORTER A L. A forward diversity index[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 90(2):407-427.
[39] STIRLING A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15):707-719.
[40] AVERSA E S.Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging:a study of the working literature[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3):383-389.
[41] BAUMGARTNER S E, LEYDESDORFFe L. Group-based trajectory modeling of citations in scholarly literature:dynamic qualities of "Transient" and "Sticky" knowledge claims[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 65(4):797-811.
[42] MCFASSEN D, REID F. Aggregate travel demand forecasting from disaggregated behavioral models[J]. Transportation research record:travel behavior and values, 1975, 534(534):24-37.
[43] MCFASSEN D. Regression-based specification tests for the multinomial logit model[J]. Journal of econometrics, 1987, 34(1):63-82.
[44] HU X, ROUSSEAU R. Scientific influence is not always visible:The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2016, 10(4):1079-1091.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉