图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 16: 67 - 80

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.16.008

情报研究

微信用户后悔情绪影响因素与应对策略选择——基于SEM与fsQCA的研究

  • 许芳 ,
  • 杨杰 ,
  • 田萌 ,
  • 徐国虎
展开
  • 1 中南民族大学管理学院 武汉 430074;
    2 中南财经政法大学工商管理学院 武汉 430073
许芳(ORCID:0000-0001-9515-5678),副教授,硕士生导师,E-mail:xffx2001@126.com;杨杰(ORCID:0000-0002-4787-1028),硕士研究生;田萌(ORCID:0000-0002-9359-7656),博士研究生;徐国虎(ORCID:0000-0002-9035-7841),教授,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2019-12-15

  修回日期: 2020-02-18

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-20

收起

Antecedents and Coping Strategies of WeChat Users' Regret Based on SEM and FsQCA

  • Xu Fang ,
  • Yang Jie ,
  • Tian Meng ,
  • Xu Guohu
Expand
  • 1 School of Management, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074;
    2 School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073

Received date: 2019-12-15

  Revised date: 2020-02-18

  Online published: 2020-08-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 随着社交媒体应用的迅速普及和持续渗透，众多社交媒体用户面临过度使用问题，其正常的学习、工作和生活受到干扰，引发了用户焦虑、倦怠与后悔等负面情绪。探究引发用户后悔情绪的影响因素与应对策略的选择问题对社交媒体服务商缓解用户负面情绪、提高用户忠诚度，并促进用户健康使用社交媒体具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 以微信用户为研究对象，从社交过载、信息过载和系统功能过载视角出发，考虑用户转换成本与自我情绪管理的影响，构建微信用户过度使用的后悔情绪影响因素及其应对策略模型，采用结构方程模型（SEM）与模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）相结合的方法进行分析。[结果/结论] ①微信用户涉入程度正向影响用户对社交过载、信息过载和系统功能过载的感知及其转换成本，进而加剧用户的后悔情绪；②用户的后悔情绪越强烈、面临的转换成本越高，则越倾向于采取情绪导向应对策略，其次是问题导向应对策略；③微信用户自我情绪管理水平越高，用户越可能采取合适的应对策略以缓解自身后悔情绪；④定性比较分析发现两类触发微信用户后悔情绪的前因构型、四类触发问题导向应对策略选择的前因构型和一类触发情绪导向应对的前因构型。

关键词： 社交媒体; 感知过载; 后悔; 应对策略

本文引用格式

许芳 , 杨杰 , 田萌 , 徐国虎 . 微信用户后悔情绪影响因素与应对策略选择——基于SEM与fsQCA的研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(16) : 67 -80 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.16.008

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] With the rapid popularization and continuous penetration of social media applications, an increasing number of users are confronting the problem of overuse, which disrupts their study, work and life, causing their anxiety, regret and other negative emotions. Exploring the factors that cause users to regret and employ different coping strategies is conducive to helping social media service providers alleviate users' negative emotions and foster their loyalties, as well as shedding light on users for utilizing social media rationally.[Method/process] Taking WeChat as an example, this paper proposed an extended stressor-strain-outcome model considering the effects of users' perceived overloads and switching cost on their regret and coping strategies, and then explored the causes of their regret and coping strategies selection through employing structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) methods.[Result/conclusion] The results from SEM reveal that users' involvement in WeChat strengthens their perceptions of social overload, information overload, system function overload and switching cost, which in turn reinforces their regret. Furthermore, WeChat users who have stronger regret and higher switching costs are more willing to choose emotion-focused coping strategies rather than problem-focused coping ones. In addition, the findings show that self-emotion regulation fully moderates the effects of regret on coping strategies. The fsQCA results demonstrate two sufficient configurations that lead to user's regret, four ones that trigger problem-focused coping, and one that causes emotion-focused coping.

Key words： social media; perceived overloads; regret; coping strategies

参考文献

[1] 2015年中国社交媒体影响报告[EB/OL].[2019-12-29].http://www.199it.com/archives/327301.html.
[2] LIN H, FAN W, CHAU P Y K. Determinants of users' continuance of social networking sites:a self-regulation perspective[J]. Information & management, 2014, 51(5):595-603.
[3] DHIR M, MIDHA V. Overload, privacy settings, and discontinuation:a preliminary study of FaceBook users[EB/OL].[2019-12-29].https://aisel.aisnet.org/sighci2014/12.
[4] SHOKOUHYAR S, SIADAT S H, RAZAVI M K. How social influence and personality affect users' social network fatigue and discontinuance behavior[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2018, 70(4):344-366.
[5] MAIER C, LAUMER S, ECKHARDT A, et al. When social networking turns to social overload:explaining the stress, emotional exhaustion, and quitting behavior from social network sites' users[C]//Proceedings of the 20th European conference on information system. Barcelona:ECIS, 2012:71.
[6] NAWAZ M A, SHAH Z, NAWAZ A, et al. Overload and exhaustion:classifying SNS discontinuance intentions[J]. Cogent psychology, 2018, 5(1):1515584.
[7] ZHANG S, ZHAO L, LU Y, et al. Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services[J]. Information & management, 2016, 53(7):904-914.
[8] SHIN J, SHIN M. To be connected or not to be connected? Mobile messenger overload, fatigue, and mobile shunning[J]. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 2016, 19(10):579-586.
[9] ZHU X, BAO Z. Why people use social networking sites passively:an empirical study integrating impression management concern, privacy concern, and SNS fatigue[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2018, 70(2):158-175.
[10] MAIER C, LAUMER S, ECKHARDT A, et al. Giving too much social support:social overload on social networking sites[J]. European journal of information systems, 2015a, 24(5):447-464.
[11] MAIER C, LAUMER S, WEINERT C, et al. The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services:a study of Facebook use[J]. Information systems journal, 2015b, 25(3):275-308.
[12] CAO X, SUN J. Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users:an SOR perspective[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 81:10-18.
[13] LUQMAN A, CAO X, ALI A, et al. Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2017, 70:544-555.
[14] YU L, CAO X, LIU Z, et al. Excessive social media use at work:exploring the effects of social media overload on job performance[J]. Information technology & people, 2018, 31(6):1091-1112.
[15] 李家俊,李晏墅,秦伟平,等.团队结构约束对员工创造力的影响:基于情绪理论视角[J].江苏社会科学,2017(1):46-52.
[16] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):155-167.
[17] LEE A R, SON S M, KIM K K. Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue:a stress perspective[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2016, 55:51-61.
[18] 毛冷蕊.社会化媒体用户介入度研究——以"ADS广告咖"微信公众号为例[J].湖北社会科学,2018(8):184-192.
[19] BAUM A, CALESNICK L E, DAVIS G E, et al. Individual differences in coping with crowding:stimulus screening and social overload[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1982, 43(4):821-830.
[20] EVANS G W, LEPORE S J. Household crowding and social support:a quasiexperimental analysis[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1993, 65(2):308-316.
[21] LAUMER S, MAIER C, WEINERT C. The negative side of ICT-enabled communication:the case of social interaction overload in online social networks[C]. Proceedings of the 21st European conference on information system, 2013, 41(2):210-228.
[22] 微信2018影响力报告[EB/OL].[2019-12-18]. http://www.199it.com/archives/725398.html.
[23] ZEELENBERG M. Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making[J]. Journal of behavioral decision making, 1999, 12(2):93-106.
[24] ROESE N J. Counterfactual thinking[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1997, 121(1):133-148.
[25] EPSTUDE K, ROESE N J. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking[J]. Personality and social psychology review, 2008, 12(2):168-192.
[26] 赵依恬.幸福感如何影响反事实思维和后悔情绪:心理资本的中介作用[D].杭州:浙江大学,2019.
[27] DUNBAR R. How many friends does one person need[J]. Evolutionary psychology, 2010, (4):500-504.
[28] KANG Y S, HONG S, LEE H. Exploring continued online service usage behavior:the roles of self-image congruity and regret[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2009, 25(1):111-122.
[29] EPPLER M J, MENGIS J. The concept of information overload:a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines[J]. The information society, 2004, 20(5):325-344.
[30] MESSNER C, WAENKE M. Unconscious information processing reduces information overload and increase product satisfaction[J]. Journal of consumer psychology, 2011, 21(1):9-13.
[31] YANG H C, KIM J L. The influence of perceived characteristics of SNS, external influence and information overload on SNS satisfaction and using reluctant intention:mediating effects of self-esteem and thought suppression[J]. International journal of information processing and management, 2013, 4(6):19-30.
[32] SAGIOGLOU C, GREITEMEYER T. Facebook's emotional consequences:why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 35:359-363.
[33] YAO X, PHANG C W, LING H. Understanding the influences of trend and fatigue in individuals' SNS switching intention[C]//2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii:IEEE, 2015:324-334.
[34] 周涛,鲁耀斌,张金隆.使能因素与抑制因素双重视角下的移动商务用户采纳后行为研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2010,10(1):120-124.
[35] JONES M A, REYNOLDS K E, MOTHERSBAUGH D L, et al. The positive and negative effects of switching costs on relational outcomes[J]. Journal of service research, 2007, 9(4):335-355.
[36] LAZARUS R S, FOLKMAN S. Stress, appraisal, and coping[M]. New York:Springer publishing company,1984:150-153.
[37] SRIWILAI K, CHAROENSUKMONGKOL P. Face it, don't Facebook it:impacts of social media addiction on mindfulness, coping strategies and the consequence on emotional exhaustion[J]. Stress and health, 2016, 32(4):427-434.
[38] CROCKER P R E, GRAHAM T R. Coping by competitive athletes with performance stress:gender differences and relationships with affect[J]. The sport psychologist, 1995, 9(3):325-338.
[39] YI S, BAUMGARTNER H. Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations[J]. Journal of consumer psychology, 2004, 14(3):303-317.
[40] 李旭,刘鲁川,张冰倩.认知负荷视角下社交媒体用户倦怠及消极使用行为研究——以微信为例[J].图书馆论坛,2018,38(11):94-106.
[41] BAKER J R, MOOER S M. Distress, coping, and blogging:comparing new Myspace users by their intention to blog[J]. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 2008, 11(1):81-85.
[42] TAKAHASHI M, FUJIMOTO M, YAMASAKI N. The active lurker:influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment[C]//Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. New York:ACM, 2003:1-10.
[43] 刘鲁川,李旭,张冰倩.基于扎根理论的社交媒体用户倦怠与消极使用研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(12):100-106,51.
[44] DIAMOND L M, ASPINWALL L G. Emotion regulation across the life span:an integrative perspective emphasizing self-regulation, positive affect, and dyadic processes[J]. Motivation and emotion, 2003, 27(2):125-156.
[45] FARH C I C, SEO M G, TESLUK P E. Emotional intelligence, teamwork effectiveness, and job performance:the moderating role of job context[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2012, 97(4):890-900.
[46] COLE P M, MICHEL M K, TETI L O D. The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation:a clinical perspective[J]. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 1994, 59(2/3):73-102.
[47] WONG C S, LAW K S. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude:an exploratory study[J]. The leadership quarterly, 2002, 13(3):243-274.
[48] BIELBY W T, HAUSER R M. Structural equation models[J]. Annual review of sociology, 1977, 3(1):137-161.
[49] 徐广平,张金山,杜运周.环境与组织因素组态效应对公司创业的影响——一项模糊集的定性比较分析[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(01):3-16.
[50] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2008.
[51] FISS P C. Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉