图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 19: 109 - 118

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.19.012

情报研究

搜索输入方式与性别差异对儿童信息搜索体验的影响研究

  • 杭璐 ,
  • 陈嬿 ,
  • 王嘉琪
展开
  • 江南大学设计学院, 无锡, 214122
杭璐(ORCID:0000-0002-9905-103X),硕士研究生;王嘉琪(ORCID:0000-0002-3916-7794),硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2020-03-23

  修回日期: 2020-04-23

  网络出版日期: 2020-10-05

基金资助

本文系江苏省社会科学基金项目"情绪诱发法在产品交互体验设计中的应用研究"（项目编号：17YSB020）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Influence of Search Input Mode and Gender Difference on Children's Information Search Experience

  • Hang Lu ,
  • Chen Yan ,
  • Wang Jiaqi
Expand
  • School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122

Received date: 2020-03-23

  Revised date: 2020-04-23

  Online published: 2020-10-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 提升可用性和情感体验是引导儿童使用信息搜索工具的重要途径。通过实验研究的方法，了解输入方式和性别差异对儿童搜索体验的影响，为儿童信息搜索平台建设提供参考依据。[方法/过程] 邀请儿童完成特定的封闭式搜索任务，评估键盘打字、手写输入和语音搜索3种输入方式对儿童信息搜索可用性和情感体验的影响。[结果/结论] 搜索输入方式对儿童信息搜索可用性有显著影响，其中语音搜索的操作可用性最好、儿童的情感体验最积极；性别对儿童信息搜索可用性和情感体验有显著影响，男孩在信息搜索中的行为表现和情感体验较好；输入方式与性别差异对搜索可用性存在交互效应；语音用户界面搜索方式能够满足儿童的可用性和情感需求。

关键词： 儿童信息搜索; 输入方式; 情绪体验; 情绪测量; 可用性

本文引用格式

杭璐 , 陈嬿 , 王嘉琪 . 搜索输入方式与性别差异对儿童信息搜索体验的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(19) : 109 -118 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.19.012

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Improving usability and emotional experience is an important way to guide children to use information search tools.By means of experimental research, we can understand the influence of input mode and gender difference on children's search experience, so as to provide reference for the construction of children's information search platform. [Method/process] Children were invited to complete a specific closed search task to assess the impact of three input methods:keyboard typing, handwriting typing and voice search on children's information search usability and emotional experience. [Result/conclusion] Search input mode has a significant impact on children's information search usability, among which voice search has the highest usability and the most positive emotional experience. Gender has a significant effect on the usability and emotional experience of children's information search. Boys have better behavioral performance and emotional experience in information search. And the difference of input mode and gender has interactive effect on search usability. Voice user interfaces search can meet the usability and emotional needs of children.

Key words： children's information search; input mode; emotional experience; emotional measurement; usability

参考文献

[1] 康梦兰,张敏.青少年信息检索策略的国外研究进展述评[J].数字图书馆论坛,2019(5):65-72.
[2] 沙勇忠,任立肖.网络用户信息查寻行为研究述评[J].图书情报工作,2005,49(1):134-138,117.
[3] 中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC).2019年全国未成年人互联网使用情况研究报告[R/OL].[2020-05-13].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/qsnbg/202005/t20200513_71011.htm.
[4] 文涛, 李雪, 李晟, 等. 手机输入法可用性评估研究[J]. 人类工效学, 2012, 18(2):27-31.
[5] 侯冠华,刘颖,范光瑞.时间压力与导航结构对老年读者信息搜寻情感体验的影响研究[J].图书馆建设,2018(6):81-87.
[6] 周佳骏.面向检索和阅读任务的少儿信息检索行为特征研究[J].图书馆论坛,2013,33(3):102-107.
[7] 付永民.儿童用数字化产品界面分析[J].设计,2013(11):13-16.
[8] 罗赛峰.儿童信息检索行为若干问题的讨论[J].图书馆杂志,2015,34(8):70-74,77.
[9] KUHLTHAU C C. The role of experience in the information search process of an early career information worker:perceptions of uncertainty, complexity, construction, and sources[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(5):399-412.
[10] 刘鲁川,孙凯.社会化媒体用户的情感体验与满意度关系——以微博为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(1):76-91.
[11] 王伟军, 鲍丽倩. 青少年网络搜索行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(24):117-122.
[12] WU K C. Affective surfing in the visualized interface of a digital library for children[J]. Information processing & management, 2015, 51(4):373-390.
[13] 陈成鑫.青少年信息查询行为研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2011(1):32-35.
[14] COOPER L Z. Developmentally appropriate digital environments for young children[J]. Library trends, 2005, 54(2):286-302.
[15] 李响.基于实验研究的儿童搜索引擎设计[J].现代情报,2018,38(11):84-89.
[16] READ J C. A study of the usability of handwriting recognition for text entry by children[J]. Interacting with computers, 2007, 19(1):57-69.
[17] SCHOMAKER L. From handwriting analysis to pen-computer applications[J]. Electronics & communication engineering journal, 1998, 10(3):93-102.
[18] ZHAI S, KRISTENSSON P O, SMITH B A. In search of effective text input interfaces for off the desktop computing[J]. Interacting with computers, 2005, 17(3):229-250.
[19] 斯莱文. 教育心理学:理论与实践[M].北京:人民邮电出版社, 2016.
[20] 张萍,梁宗保,陈会昌,等.2~11岁儿童自我控制发展的稳定性与变化及其性别差异[J].心理发展与教育,2012,28(5):463-470.
[21] VAN DUIJVENVOORDE A C K, JANSEN B R J, GRIFFIOEN E S, et al. Decomposing developmental differences in probabilistic feedback learning:a combined performance and heart-rate analysis[J]. Biological psychology, 2013, 93(1):175-183.
[22] WANG D, LIU T, SHI J. Development of monetary and social reward processes[J]. Scientific reports, 2017, 7(1):1-10.
[23] 中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC).2019年中国网民搜索引擎使用情况调查报告[R/OL].[2020-04-13].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/ssbg/201910/t20191025_70843.htm.
[24] 王丽. 两种典型汉字输入装置的输入绩效及认知负荷研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2010.
[25] 陈京军, 许磊, 程晓荣, 等. 儿童汉字练习:纸笔手写与键盘拼音输入的效果比较[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10):1258-1269.
[26] CRESTANI F, DU H. Written versus spoken queries:a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(7):881-890.
[27] 王建民.图形用户界面设计的原则与发展趋势探讨[J].艺术探索,2007(2):114,119.
[28] COHEN M H, GIANGOLA J P, BALOGH J. Voice user interface design[M].Boston:Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004.
[29] NAKAGAWA T, UWANO H. Usability differential in positions of software keyboard on smartphone[C]//The 1st IEEE global conference on consumer electronics 2012. Tokyo:IEEE, 2012:304-308.
[30] 陈喆. 手指属性和中文特性对智能手持设备手写界面设计的影响[D].北京:清华大学,2014.
[31] SIM K C. Speak-as-you-swipe (SAYS) a multimodal interface combining speech and gesture keyboard synchronously for continuous mobile text entry[C]//Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction.New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2012:555-560.
[32] 林余. 儿童青少年情绪图片评价系统的建立及其特征[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2014.
[33] 李靖,钱秀莹.7~11岁儿童持续注意能力的性别差异研究[J].应用心理学,2000(2):25-28.
[34] 潘泰陶.7~12岁儿童动作协调能力性别差异的研究[J].中国体育科技,2002(11):16-18.
[35] BEVAN N, CARTER J, EARTHY J, et al. New ISO standards for usability, usability reports and usability measures[C]//International conference on human-computer interaction. Cham:Springer, 2016:268-278.
[36] 郭晴. 高校移动图书馆用户持续使用意愿影响因素的实证研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2014(10):32-37.
[37] 郭伏, 操雅琴, 丁一, 等. 基于多模式测量的电子商务网站情感体验研究[J]. 信息系统学报, 2013(2):24-36.
[38] SLUIS F V D, DIJK B V. A closer look at children's information retrieval usage[C]//33st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR'10). New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2010:314-317.
[39] DESMET P M A, VASTENBURG M H, ROMERO N. Mood measurement with Pick-A-Mood:review of current methods and design of a pictorial self-report scale[J]. Journal of design research, 2016, 14(3):241-279.
[40] 白露,马慧,黄宇霞,等.中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005(11):4-7.
[41] SHNEIDERMAN B. The limits of speech recognition[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2000, 43(9):63-65.
[42] JIANG J, JENG W, HE D. How do users respond to voice input errors?:lexical and phonetic query reformulation in voice search[C]//Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2013:143-152.
[43] RUAN S, WOBBROCK J O, LIOU K, et al. Comparing speech and keyboard text entry for short messages in two languages on touchscreen phones[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2018, 1(4):1-23.
[44] 邹雨晨,丁颖,张旭然,等.不同类型反馈对儿童学习效果的影响及性别差异[J].心理发展与教育,2018,34(5):567-575.
[45] 李飞, 卢盛华. 情绪体验的性别差异及其成因[J]. 社会心理科学, 2014(2):40-43.
[46] 刘夏阳, 陈国良, 陈福兴, 等. 长远航舰员持续注意警觉能力的性别差异[J]. 第二军医大学学报, 2017, 38(1):102-105.
[47] 李蹊.中外少儿搜索引擎比较研究[J].晋图学刊,2017(5):25-28.
[48] KORTUM P. HCI beyond the GUI:design for haptic, speech, olfactory, and other nontraditional interfaces[M]. Burlington:Elsevier, 2008.
[49] LOTTERBACH S, PEISSNER M. Voice user interfaces in industrial environments[EB/OL].[2020-04-13]. http://cs.emis.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings68/GI-Proceedings.68-121.pdf.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉