[目的/意义] 对开放政府数据价值测量的既有实践进行梳理与比较，对未来开展的开放政府数据测量项目提供建议，并为国内学界提供参考。[方法/过程] 对国内外具有代表性的16个涉及开放政府数据价值测量的评估项目和研究报告进行梳理，比较其评估时间、主体、对象、梯度、范围和价值类型，归纳其价值测量方法，并对各类价值测量方法的特点和适用性进行说明。[结果/结论] 厘清了公共部门信息资源、开放数据和开放政府数据这三类评估对象之间的区别与联系，区分了开放政府数据价值测量的三个梯度，即产出、效果与影响，比较了不同价值测量方法的特点与适用性，并对现有开放政府数据价值测量实践存在的问题和难点进行了总结。从特征上看，评估实践总体经历了从评估公共部门信息资源利用和再利用到评估政府数据开放，从侧重单一经济价值到注重综合价值的发展历程。从方法上看，目前实践中采用的价值测量方法可从宏观上分为定量和定性两大类，定量的价值测量方法还可分为基于社会经济指标测算和基于多维度评估框架与指标体系构建两种类型。
[Purpose/significance] With the growing trend of open government data around the world, the assessments on the value of open government data have emerged and become increasingly important. This paper aims to reveal a comparative study on the features and methods presented in the value assessment projects, and to provide meaningful references for future research and practice. [Method/process] By examining 16 representative projects, this paper analyzed the features among those value assessment practices and summarized the existing methods for measuring the value of open government data. [Result/conclusion] The economic value assessment of using and reusing public sector information provide the basis of the value assessment of open government data. In recent years, the multi-dimensional value of open government data has received more research interest than the single economic value. For measuring the value of open government data, related methods can be generally divided into quantitative ones and qualitative ones. Quantitative methods include two broad strategies. One is based on the estimation of socio-economic indicators and the other is based on the ratings of evaluation metrics and indices. Different methods have their different properties and applicability. This paper also provides some suggestions based on the analysis.
[1] 郑磊, 关文雯. 开放政府数据评估框架、指标与方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(18):43-55.
[2] 夏义堃. 国际组织开放政府数据评估方法的比较与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(19):75-83.
[3] CHARALABIDIS Y, LOUKIS E, ALEXOPOULOS C. Evaluating second generation open government data infrastructures using value models[C]//47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii:IEEE, 2014:2114-2126.
[4] ORIGLIA C, CERSOSIMO D, BIANCHI T, et al. Assessing an open government data initiative. the case of OpenCoesione[C]//In 2016 conference for e-democracy and open government (CeDEM). Krems:IEEE, 2016:164-171.
[5] DAWES S S, HELBIG N. Information strategies for open government:challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency[C]//International conference on electronic government. Berlin:Springer, 2010:50-60.
[6] HARRISON T M, GUERRERO S, BURKE G B, et al. Open government and e-government:democratic challenges from a public value perspective[J]. Information polity, 2012, 17(2):83-97.
[7] STUERMER M, DAPP M M. Measuring the promise of open data:development of the impact monitoring framework[C]//2016 conference for e-democracy and open government (CeDEM). Krems:IEEE, 2016:197-203.
[8] 韦忻伶,安小米,李雪梅,等. 开放政府数据评估体系述评:特点分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(18):119-127.
[9] 黄如花, 何乃东, 李白杨. 我国开放政府数据的价值体系构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(20):6-11.
[10] PIRA. Commercial exploitation of Europe's public sector information[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/commercial-exploitation-europes-public-sector-information-pira-study-full-report.
[11] MEPSIR. Measuring European public sector information resources[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?doc_id=1198.
[12] McKinsey. Open data:unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information[EB/OL].[2020-04-06].https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Open%20data%20Unlocking%20innovation%20and%20performance%20with%20liquid%20information/MGI_Open_data_FullReport_Oct2013.ashx.
[13] CARRARA W, CHAN W S, FISCHER S, et al. Creating value through open data:study on the impact of re-use of public data resources[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/edp_creating_value_through_open_data_0.pdf.
[14] Sunlight Foundation. The social impact of open data[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/policy/SocialImpactofOpenData.pdf.
[15] UHLIR P F. The socioeconomic effects of public sector information on digital networks:towards a better understanding of different access and re-use policies. workshop summary[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12687/the-socioeconomic-effects-of-public-sector-information-on-digital-networks.
[16] NODA T. A consideration about the method of economic effect estimation by using open data[J]. Journal of economics, 2015(41):51-70.
[17] 陈传夫,黄璇.政府信息资源增值利用研究[J].情报科学,2008(7):961-966.
[18] 陈美. 开放政府数据价值:内涵、评价与实践[J]. 图书馆, 2018(9):27-32.
[19] 陈美. 开放政府数据价值评估:进展与启示[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(11):92-98.
[20] PARYCEK P, HÖCHTL J, GINNER M. Open government data implementation evaluation[J]. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 2014, 9(2):80-99.
[21] PEREIRA G V, MACADAR M A, LUCIANO E M, et al. Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a smart city context[J]. Information systems frontiers, 2017, 19(2):213-229.
[22] ZUIDERWIJK A, SHINDE R, JANSSEN M. Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives:is there a mismatch between objectives and results?[J]. International review of administrative sciences, 2018. doi:10.1177/0020852317739115.
[23] 郑磊, 吕文增. 公共数据开放的产出与效果研究——以上海开放数据创新应用大赛为例[J]. 电子政务, 2017(9):2-10.
[24] 赵继娣,张罕仑.地方政府数据开放成效评价研究——以上海市为例[J].电子政务,2017(9):11-21.
[25] XU G. The benefits of open data-evidence from economic research[EB/OL].[2020-04-06] http://openeconomics.net/2012/10/03/the-benefits-of-open-data-evidence-from-economic-research/.
[26] VICKERY G. Review of recent studies on psi re-use and related market developments[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/review-recent-studies-psi-reuse-and-related-market-developments.
[27] Deloitte. Market assessment of public sector information[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-sector-information-market-assessment.
[28] Ordnance Survey. Assessing the value of OS OpenData to the economy of Great Britain:synopsis[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ordnance-survey-open-data-economic-value-study.
[29] ODDC. Open data in developing countries[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. http://opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/Phase%201%20-%20Synthesis%20-%20Full%20Report-print.pdf.
[30] Govlab. Open data impact when demand and supply meet[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. http://odimpact.org/files/open-data-impact-key-findings.pdf.
[31] World Wide Web Foundation. Towards common methods for assessing open data:workshop report & draft framework[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. http://opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Common%20Assessment%20Workshop%20Report.pdf.
[32] KOSKI H, TUTKIMUSLAITOS E. The impact of open data-a preliminary study[EB/OL].[2020-04-06].https://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/wiki/images/6/67/Impact_of_Open_Data_in_the_Public_Sector_Koski_2015.pdf.
[33] DataSF. Evaluation and performance plan for open data[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://datasf.org/resources/open-data-metrics/.
[34] Open data barometer. Open data barometer-global report 4th edition[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://opendatabarometer.org/.
[35] 中国开放数林指数. 中国地方政府数据开放报告(2019上半年)[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. http://ifopendata.fudan.edu.cn/static/papers/中国地方政府数据开放报告2019上半年.pdf.
[36] 范佳佳. 全球重要城市开放数据指数[EB/OL].[2020-04-12]. http://www.cbdio.com/BigData/2019-08/12/content_6150341.htm.
[37] OECD. Digital broadband content-public sector information and content[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504042.pdf.
[38] The world bank. Open data essentials[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/essentials.html.
[39] 付熙雯, 郑磊. 政府数据开放国内研究综述[J]. 电子政务, 2013(6):8-15.
[40] 郑磊. 开放的数林政府数据开放的中国故事[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2018.
[41] Office of fair trading. The commercial use of public information (CUPI)[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/2014-12/media2562.pdf.
[42] EASTON D. A systems analysis of political life[M], New York:Wiley, 1965.
[43] UNDERDAL A, YOUNG O R. Regime consequences:methodological challenges and research strategies[M]. New York:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
[44] ACIL Tasman. The value of spatial information:the impact of modern spatial information technologies on the Australian economy[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://www.crcsi.com.au/assets/Resources/7d60411d-0ab9-45be-8d48-ef8dab5abd4a.pdf.
[45] ACIL Tasman. Spatial information in the New Zealand economy-realising productivity gains[EB/OL].[2020-04-06]. https://dmpublisher.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/old-dm/directionsmag.com/ee/images/articles/spatial-information-in-the-new-zealand-economy-2009.pdf.
[46] 陈向明.社会科学中的定性研究方法[J].中国社会科学,1996(6):93-102.
