图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2020 , Vol. 64 >Issue 20: 129 - 139

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.20.014

情报研究

网络百科群体冲突发展特征及其影响因素研究

  • 于金平 ,
  • 黄令贺 ,
  • 云慧
展开
  • 河北大学管理学院 保定 071002
于金平(ORCID:0000-0002-3576-7469),硕士研究生;云慧(ORCID:0000-0002-2575-3995),硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2020-04-15

  修回日期: 2020-06-17

  网络出版日期: 2020-10-20

基金资助

本文系河北省社会科学基金项目"开放式协作生产活动中用户信息行为冲突研究"（项目编号：HB18TQ002）研究成果之一。

收起

The Characteristics of Evolution and Factors of Group Conflicts in the Internet Encyclopedia

  • Yu Jinping ,
  • Huang Linghe ,
  • Yun Hui
Expand
  • School of Management, Hebei University, Baoding 071002

Received date: 2020-04-15

  Revised date: 2020-06-17

  Online published: 2020-10-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 对大规模用户讨论过程进行分析，能够深入挖掘网络百科群体冲突发展特征及其影响因素，并有助于理解内容生产过程中的群体冲突现象，为管理这种冲突提供理论指导。[方法/过程] 在团队冲突理论基础上，构建包括词条主题、冲突成因、任务复杂度、冲突持续时间、冲突强度、冲突转化、冲突结果7个变量的编码框架，采用内容分析法从冲突开端、中间过程、冲突结果三个方面对选自于百度百科吧中与词条编辑冲突相关的137个"用户讨论过程"展开分析。[结果/结论] 研究发现，认知差异、利益矛盾和权力分歧均为网络百科群体冲突发生的原因，且无主次之分；任务复杂度与冲突强度呈正相关关系，且在一定范围内与冲突发生的可能性呈负相关关系，但对冲突结果无直接影响；冲突转化会显著提高冲突强度，冲突强度与冲突持续时间呈正相关关系。冲突强度过大和冲突转化均不利于冲突的解决。网络百科群体冲突结果包括分离、支配、妥协、整合一致、结构性改善5种类型，但超过一半的冲突并未得到解决。

关键词： 网络百科; 群体冲突; 讨论过程; 内容分析法

本文引用格式

于金平 , 黄令贺 , 云慧 . 网络百科群体冲突发展特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020 , 64(20) : 129 -139 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.20.014

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The analysis of the large-scale user discussion processes can deeply dig into the characteristics of evolution and factors of group conflicts in the Internet Encyclopedia, and it is beneficial to understand the group conflicts in the content production process, and can provide theoretical guidance for the management of such conflicts.[Method/process] Based on the theory of team conflict, this paper constructed a coding framework of seven variables, including the topic of the entry, the cause of the conflict, the complexity of the task, the duration of the conflict, the intensity of the conflict, and the result of the conflict. Applying the content analysis method to analyze 137 "User Discussion Processes" related to the conflicts of entry editing selected from Baidu Encyclopedia based on three aspects:the beginning of the conflict, intermediate process and the result of the conflict.[Result/conclusion] The study found that cognitive differences, interest contradictions and power disagreements were all the causes of group conflicts in the Internet Encyclopedia, and there was no primary or secondary cause; the task complexity had positively correlated with the conflict intensity, and a negative correlation with conflict probability within a certain range, but had no direct impact on the result of the conflict; conflict transformation would significantly increase the intensity of the conflict, which was positively correlated with the duration of the conflict. Excessive conflict intensity and conflict transformation were not conducive to conflict resolution. The results of online encyclopedia group conflicts included five types:separation, domination, compromise, integration and structural improvement, but more than half of the conflicts had not been resolved.

Key words： Internet encyclopedia; group conflicts; discussion process; content analysis method

参考文献

[1] Alexa. Top sites[EB/OL].[2020-05-28]. https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.org.
[2] 沙勇忠, 阎劲松. 维基百科:一种网络环境下的新型知识生产方式及其价值意蕴[J]. 情报资料工作, 2006(4):21-25.
[3] RANSBOTHAM S, KANE G C. Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities:explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia[J]. Mis quarterly, 2011,35(3):613-627.
[4] 刘丰军, 裘江南, 林正奎, 等. 网络百科社区协调机制研究——以Wikipedia为例[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(6):123-135.
[5] 黄顺铭, 李红涛. 在线集体记忆的协作性书写——中文维基百科"南京大屠杀"条目(2004-2014)的个案研究[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2015,22(1):6-24, 127.
[6] KITTUR A, SUH B, PENDLETON B A, et al. He says, she says:conflict and coordination in Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems,California:ACM, 2007:453-462.
[7] 百度百科. 百科分类管理员[EB/OL].[2020-05-10]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%99%BE%E7%A7%91%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E5%91%98#4.
[8] BURIOL L, CASTILLO C, DONATO D, et al. Temporal evolution of the Wikigraph:Proceedings of web intelligence[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on Web intelligence. Washington, DC:ACM, 2006:45-51.
[9] 张亚琼. 群体抗争与群众意愿:社会冲突类事件在维基百科与百度百科中的话语博弈[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2017.
[10] 黄令贺, 张迎军, 程靖淇, 等. 网络百科内容生产过程中的用户冲突研究——以"PX词条保卫战"为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,60(3):114-120.
[11] 谢建社, 朱明. 社会冲突管理的理论与实践[M]. 南昌:江西人民出版社, 2005:288.
[12] VIÉGAS F B, WATTENBERG M, DAVE K. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Vienna:ACM, 2004:575-582.
[13] FRÉARD D, DENIS A, DÉTIENNE F, et al. The role of argumentation in online epistemic communities:the anatomy of a conflict in Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the 28th annual European conference on cognitive ergonomics. Rostock, Germany:ACM, 2010:91-98.
[14] KITTUR A, CHI E H, SUH B. What's in Wikipedia? Mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Boston:ACM, 2009:1509-1512.
[15] YASSERI T, KERTÉSZ J. Value production in a collaborative environment[J]. Journal of statistical physics, 2013,151:414-439.
[16] SUMI R, YASSERI T. Edit wars in Wikipedia[C]//2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing, Boston:IEEE, 2011:724-727.
[17] YASSERI T, SUMI R, RUNG A, et al. Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia[J]. Plos one, 2012,7(6):e38869.
[18] DEDEO S. Conflict and computation on Wikipedia:a finite-state machine analysis of editor interactions[J]. Future Internet, 2016,8(3):1-23.
[19] 吴克文. 互联网群体协作中冲突管理与改进设计[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2013.
[20] KANE G C, FICHMAN R G. The shoemaker's children:using wikis for IS teaching, research, and publication[J]. Mis quarterly, 2009,33(1):1-22.
[21] SCHNEIDER J, PASSANT A, BRESLIN J. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of how Wikipedia talk pages are used[C]//The web science conference 2010, North Carolina:ACM, 2010:1-7.
[22] OSMAN K. The role of conflict in determining consensus on quality in Wikipedia articles[C]//Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on open collaboration. Hong Kong:ACM, 2013:1-6.
[23] 董阳, 陈晓旭. 从"极化"走向"理性":网络空间中公共舆论的演变路径——百度百科"PX词条保卫战"的启示[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015,12(2):55-67.
[24] 尚闻一, 车尚锟. 群体极化还是协商调和?——维基百科"Islamophobia"词条实证研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019,39(9):71-81.
[25] KITTUR A, KRAUT R E. Beyond Wikipedia:Coordination and conflict in online production groups[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. Savannah:ACM, 2010:215-224.
[26] GANDICA Y, SAMPAIO DOS AIDOS F, CARVALHO J. The dynamic nature of conflict in Wikipedia[J]. Europhysics letters, 2014,108(1):1-12.
[27] 罗双玲, 麻佩, 王瑞新, 等. 一个维基百科编辑冲突动力学模型[J]. 科研管理, 2017,38(11):18-26.
[28] ZHAO H, KALLANDER W, JOHNSON H, et al. Smartwiki:a reliable and conflict-refrained wiki model based on reader differentiation and social context analysis[J]. Knowledge-based systems, 2013,47(7):53-64.
[29] ZHANG J. How Baidu Baike has faced off against Wikipedia to build the world's largest online Chinese encyclopedia[EB/OL].[2020-05-26]. https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3038402/how-baidu-baike-has-faced-against-wikipedia-build-worlds-largest.
[30] 陈振娇. 探索团队冲突与团队产出之间中介机制的实证研究[D]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2009.
[31] COHEN G S. What makes teams work:group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of management, 1997,23(3):239-290.
[32] 贺文娟. 团队冲突与团队创造力关系研究[D]. 厦门:厦门大学, 2008.
[33] 黄令贺, 朱庆华. 百科词条特征及用户贡献行为研究——以百度百科为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2013,39(1):79-88.
[34] WELSER H T, COSLEY D, KOSSINETS G, et al. Finding social roles in Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. Seattle:ACM,2011:122-129.
[35] 朱玥, 谢江佩, 金杨华, 等. 团队权力分布差异对团队冲突的影响:程序公平和合法性的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019,51(7):829-840.
[36] ARAZY O, NOV O, PATTERSON R, et al. Information quality in Wikipedia:the effects of group composition and task conflict[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2011,27(4):71-98.
[37] 百度百科. 百度百科统计[EB/OL].[2019-11-26]. http://baike.baidu.com.
[38] HUANG L H, ZHU Q H, DU J T, et al. Exploring the dynamic contribution behavior of editors in wikis based on time series analysis[J]. Program electronic library & information systems, 2016,50(1):41-57.
[39] 百度百科吧. 百度百科吧统计[EB/OL].[2020-05-16]. http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kw=%E7%99%BE%E5%BA%A6%E7%99%BE%E7%A7%91&ie=utf-8.
[40] 周翔著. 传播学内容分析研究与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2014:8.
[41] MESGARI M, OKOLI C, MEHDI M, et al. "The sum of all human knowledge":a systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2015, 26(7):219-245.
[42] RAHIM M A, GARRETT J E, BUNTZMAN G F. Ethics of managing interpersonal conflict in organizations[J]. Journal of business ethics, 1992, 11:423-432.
[43] AMASON A C, SAPIENZA H J. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict[J]. Journal of management, 1997,23(4):495-516.
[44] 米勒. 亲密关系[M]. 王伟平,译.北京:人民邮电出版社, 2015.
[45] 周翔著. 传播学内容分析研究与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2014:211.
[46] 王春玲. Wikipedia中认知冲突对协同知识创新的影响规律研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2012.
[47] LEPPINK J, PAAS F, van GOG T, et al. Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load[J]. Learning and instruction, 2014, 30(1):32-42.
[48] 陈晓红, 赵可. 团队冲突、冲突管理与绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010,13(5):31-35.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉