[目的/意义] 现代信息技术环境下的书目控制研究已经迈入新的阶段，了解国外书目控制研究动向并从中获得经验，可以促进书目数据交流，实现世界范围的文献资源共享。[方法/过程] 利用包括Web of Science等平台在内的多种检索途径，采用内容分析法对近十年国外书目控制研究成果进行调查与分析。[结果/结论] 在梳理书目控制理论内涵的基础上，将国外书目控制研究归纳为区域性书目控制发展状况研究、各类文献书目控制研究、书目控制标准化研究和书目控制综合性研究四大主题。探究数字环境下书目控制研究新的增长点，指出书目控制是大数据时代目录学理论的拓展，是数字信息资源结构化的手段，也是图书馆精准服务与个性化服务的基础。最后，基于我国书目控制现状，提出推动书目控制工作良好运行、实现信息资源有序利用的发展建议。
[Purpose/significance] The research on bibliographic control under the modern information technology environment has entered a new stage. Comprehending the foreign research trends in bibliographic control and gaining experience from it can promote the exchange of bibliographic data and achieve global literature resources sharing.[Method/process] Through multiple search methods including Web of Science and other platforms, this paper utilized content analysis methods to investigate and analyze foreign bibliographic control research in the past ten years.[Result/conclusion] On the basis of combing the connotation of bibliographic control theory, this paper summarizes the research on foreign bibliographic control into 4 themes:research on regional bibliographic control development, research on bibliographic control of various types of documents, research on standardization of bibliographic control, and comprehensive research on bibliographic control. This paper explores the new growth areas of bibliographic control research under the digital environment, points out that bibliographic control is an extension of the bibliographic theory in the era of big data, a method of structuring digital information resources, and the basis of precise and personalized library service. Based on the status in China, development suggestions for the good operation of bibliographic control and the orderly utilization of information resources are given in the end.
[1] 武利红. 网络信息资源书目控制研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2009.
[2] LEVINE-CLARK M, CARTER T M. ALA glossary of library and information science[M]. 4th ed. Chicago:American Library Association, 2013:28.
[3] REITZ J M. ODLIS:online dictionary for library and information science[EB/OL].[2020-02-24]. https://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_b.aspx.
[4] LOR P J. Bibliographic standards in context:current challenges in bibliographic control[M]//COETZEE H S. Seminar on bibliographic standards for promotion of co-operation. Pretoria:University of Pretoria, 1996:1-23.
[5] SNYMAN R M M M. Bibliographic control-is the current training still relevant?[J]. International cataloguing and bibliographic control, 2001, 30(1):13-15.
[6] HOWARTH L C. Metadata and bibliographic control:soul-mates or two solitudes?[J]. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2005, 40(3/4):37-56.
[7] Library of Congress. On the record:report of the library of congress working group on the future of bibliographic control[R/OL].[2020-02-24]. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf.
[8] RAMJAUN I. National bibliographic control in Mauritius:issues and challenges[J]. Information development, 2009, 25(4):296-303.
[9] EJEDAFIRU E F, AKPORHONOR B A. Enabling and disabling bibliographic control in Nigeria[J]. International journal of library and information science, 2013, 5(4):85-89.
[10] TOWOLAWI K O. Management and acquisition of grey literature in academic libraries:a case study of Bells University of Technology, Nigeria[J]. Chinese librarianship, 2018(2):44-54.
[11] AKIDI J O, OKEZIE C A. Application of ICT to cataloguing and classification for effective bibliographic control in the National Library of Nigeria:issues and challenges[J/OL]. Library philosophy and practice, 2018, article ID 2173, 21 pages[2020-02-24]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2173/.
[12] SHORES L. Basic reference sources[M]. Chicago:American Library Association, 1954:11-12.
[13] RATH P N. Evolution of systematic bibliographies in India, 1849-1993[J]. Library & information history, 2018, 34(3):160-175.
[14] BELLINGERI L, GIUNTI M C. BNI aperta e in cooperazione:come e perché[J]. Italian journal of library, archives and information science, 2017, 8(1):67-76.
[15] NEPORI F, SABBA F. Bibliography, national bibliography, and national union catalog in Italy[J]. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2019, 57(2):73-87.
[16] NDUNGU M W. Bibliographic control of theses and dissertations in Kenya[J]. Library review, 2017, 66(6/7):523-534.
[17] HOLLEY R P. Self-publishing:a new challenge for universal bibliographic control[EB/OL].[2020-02-24]. http://library.ifla.org/818/.
[18] BARRY R K. Bibliographic control of Mongolian language material at the Library of Congress[J]. Mongolian studies, 2013, 35:7-28.
[19] DANIEL D. Elusive stories:collecting and preserving the foreign-language ethnic press in the United States[J]. Serials review, 2019, 45(1/2):7-25.
[20] HAN M J. New discovery services and library bibliographic control[J]. Library trends, 2012, 61(1):162-172.
[21] MCILWAINE I C. Universal bibliographic control and the quest for a universally acceptable subject arrangement[J]. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2010, 48(1):36-47.
[22] RIVA P, OLIVER C. Evaluation of RDA as an implementation of FRBR and FRAD[J]. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2012, 50(5/7):564-586.
[23] HOFFMAN G L. Could the functional future of bibliographic control change cataloging work? an exploration using Abbott[J]. Journal of library metadata, 2012, 12(2/3):111-126.
[24] WILLER M, PLASSARD M F. An interview with Mirna Willer[J]. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2019, 57(7/8):453-462.
[25] DUNSIRE G, HILLMANN D, PHIPPS J. Reconsidering universal bibliographic control in light of the semantic web[J]. Journal of library metadata, 2012, 12(2/3):164-176.
[26] LEONG J H. The convergence of metadata and bibliographic control? trends and patterns in addressing the current issues and challenges of providing subject access[J]. Knowledge organization, 2010, 37(1):29-42.
[27] 柯平, 刘旭青, 彭亮. 新中国书目事业70年[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(10):16-23.
[28] STALBERG E, CRONIN C. Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control[J]. Library resources & technical services, 2011, 55(3):124-137.
[29] SHEMBERKO L V, SHERSHOVA A V. Normative and technological problems of bibliographic control over information resources on social sciences and humanities[J]. Scientific and technical information processing, 2018, 45(1):55-62.
[30] KICZEK S A. Thomas Mann's contributions to current library debates on cataloging and bibliographic control[J]. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2010, 48(5):450-471.
[31] RUSCHOFF C M. Confronting the digital environment:assessing the challenges to bibliographic control of electronic resources[J/OL], Cataloging & classification quarterly, 2020[2020-02-24]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01639374.2020.1712510.DOI:10.1080/01639374.2020.1712510.
[32] 刘炜, 林海青, 夏翠娟. 数字人文研究的图书馆学方法:书目控制与文献循证[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2018, 36(5):116-123.
[33] 柯平, 刘旭青. 中国目录学七十年:发展回溯与评析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(5):101-111.
[34] 黄俊贵. 书目控制论的思辨:从世界到中国[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 1995(5):56-63.
[35] 夏南强, 胥伟岚. 中国目录学的回归与重构[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(14):34-39.
[36] 彭斐章, 付先华. 20世纪中国目录学研究的回眸与思考[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2004(6):5-10, 57.
[37] 王岩. 书目控制的含义及实用性研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 1992(4):68-71, 92.
[38] SMIRAGLIA R P. The elements of knowledge organization[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2014:33.
[39] 全国图书馆联合编目中心. 资料下载[EB/OL].[2020-02-24]. http://olcc.nlc.cn/page/document.html.
[40] 钟彬. RDA本地编目的易难辩析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(S1):11-12, 25.
[41] 毛雅君. 中国国家书目工作回顾及思考[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2017(14):45-49.
[42] BOROVIK M A, SHEMBERKO L V. The challenges of information retrieval in social sciences and humanities and ways to overcome information barriers[J]. Scientific and technical information processing, 2016, 43(2):99-105.
[43] 柯平, 刘旭青. 改革开放40年我国目录学研究的成就、问题与思考[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(5):17-22.
