[目的/意义] 随着Altmetrics研究日益深入，有效识别Altmetrics评价的利益相关方需求对评价指标设计及数据基础设施建设具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 以高校科研人员为对象，利用半结构访谈法识别我国高校科研人员的Altmetrics评价需求，采用问卷调查法获取数据并检验识别出高校科研人员Altmetrics评价需求的差异性。[结果/结论] 研究发现，我国高校科研人员主要有7类Altmetrics评价需求，分别是：研究评价，成果展示，需求发现，学术认可，交流传播，成果操作，学科发展；不同年龄组别高校科研人员在"研究评价"方面有差异，"51-60岁"年龄组较其他年龄组在"研究评价"方面的需求明显偏低；除"交流传播"外，人文学科的6个Altmetrics评价功能需求强度均低于社会学科和自然学科，自然科学与社会科学间的评价需求完全一致；除"研究评价"功能需求在教师与学生存在差异外，6个Altmetrics评价需求对所有不同身份类别高校科学人员没有差异；7类Altmetrics评价需求对高校科研人员具有较高的普遍适用性。
[Purpose/significance] With the deepening of research on Altmetrics, it is of great significance to effectively identify the needs of stakeholders in Altmetrics evaluation,which is useful to design the evaluation indicators and construct the data infrastructure. [Method/process] Taking researchers of universities in China mainland as the sampling, this paper used the semi-structured interview to identify the Altmetrics evaluation needs for University researchers in China mainland, and used questionnaire to explore the differences of the identified Altmetrics evaluation needs for University researchers. [Result/conclusion] It is found that there are seven Altmetrics evaluation needs for University researchers in China mainland, which are research evaluation, achievement display, needs discovery, academic recognition, communication and dissemination, achievement operation and discipline development. There are need differences in "research evaluation" for University researchers among different age groups, in which the "research evaluation" needs in 51-60 age groups are clearly lower than the other age groups. Except for "communication", the other six Altmetrics evaluation needs in humanities are lower than the social and natural subjects, and the evaluation needs in social and natural subjects are equal. Except for the needs differences between teachers and students in "research evaluation", the other six Altmetrics evaluation needs are not different in all other different status categories of University researchers. The results show that 7 Altmetrics evaluation needs have high universal applicability.
[1] 王贤文.Altmetrics:大数据时代的科学计量学[J].图书情报知识,2019(2):4.
[2] 韩毅.非正式交流回归语境下科技评价的融合路径取向[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(4):64-74.
[3] 清理"唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项"专项行动开展[EB/OL].[2020-06-27]. http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2018/10-24/8657958.shtml.
[4] 韩毅.中文学术成果评价的Altmetrics发展及实践路径[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018,37(1):81-86.
[5] MALONE T, BURKE S. Academic librarians? knowledge of bibliometrics and Altmetrics[J]. Evidence based library and information practice, 2016, 11(3):34.
[6] REED K, MCFARLAND D, CROFT R. Laying the groundwork for a new library service:scholar-practitioner & graduate student attitudes toward altmetrics and the curation of online profiles[j]. Evidence based library & information practice,2016,11(2):87.
[7] HOLMBERG K, VAINIO J. Why do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? reasons for online success according to the authors[J]. Scientometrics,2018, 116(3):435-447.
[8] CHEN K H, TANG M C, WANG C M, et al. Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1):97-112.
[9] BHARDWAJ R K. Academic social networking sites:comparative analysis of ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley and Zotero[J]. Information and learning sciences, 2017,118(5/6):298-316.
[10] KWOK R.Research impact:Altmetrics make their mark[J].Nature,2013,500(7463):491-493.
[11] BIK H. Researchers who have used Altmetrics for tenure & grants[EB/OL].[2020-05-23]. http://blog.impactstory.org/right-metrics-generation-open-post.
[12] MOJISOLA E,HTET A H, SARA A A,et al. Analysing researchers' outreach efforts and the association with publication metrics:a case study of kudo[EB/OL].[2020-05-17]. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0183217.
[13] NICHOLAS D,HERMAN E,XU J,et al.Early career researchers' quest for reputation in the digital age[J].Journal of scholarly publishing,2018,49(4):375-396.
[14] YURI G A,BEKAIDAR N,MARLEN Y,et al.Researcher and author profiles:opportunities, advantages, and limitations[J].Journal of Korean medical science,2017,32(11):1749-1756.
[15] 徐曼.出版行业对大数据的应用思路探析[J].出版广角,2017(17):45-47.
[16] 杜秀杰,葛赵青,卓选鹏,等.数字出版时代学术论文的互动评价探索[J].编辑学报,2014, 26(1):10-12.
[17] NISO RP-25-2016 Outputs of the NISO Alternative assessment metrics project[R/OL].[2020-05-17]. https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-25-2016-altmetrics.
[18] 沈兰妮,刘艳笑,丁文姚,等.非正式交流回归视角下Altmetrics评价的利益相关者识别研究[J].图书与情报,2018(5):22-28.
[19] 陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-63.
